Topic: What's your IQ?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #49,830
Seeing that minichan has many intellectuals with high self-reported IQ's. We should see if their IQ is self-reported or verifiable. What's your IQ through the raven test? Here is a site that administers them: https://www.raventest.net/ . You can just enter any email/name. The results will appear after you type in the email, even if the email is a throwaway/fake. Who do you think has the highest raven IQ test and who has the lowest?
Do you think the Sophie places higher than the minichan average or lower?
My results are screencaped in the OP .
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #647,680
@OPDo you feel intellectually superior to all the people that you talk to? Are you always the smartest one in the room? Did your mom tell you that you're a real catch?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #647,683
> intellectuals on minichan
Lol
Lol
DasSheeple joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,687
On the flip side, I did an official MENSA test, and rejected to be part of the circlejerk...Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,691
@previous (DasSheeple)
Do you feel intellectually superior to all the people that you talk to? Are you always the smartest one in the room? Did your mom tell you that you're a real catch?
Do you feel intellectually superior to all the people that you talk to? Are you always the smartest one in the room? Did your mom tell you that you're a real catch?
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,694
My Raven score, in each implimentation of the test, is consistently 118, for reference.
DasSheeple replied with this 10 years ago, 3 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,695
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,702
I was IQ tested at school and they said 140
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,750
Pretty good, apparently. I'm satisfied with it.I should perhaps point out, though, that this test seems to just measure one element of one element of intelleigence (fluid intelligence), as noted by Wikipedia. An article further outlining fluid intelligence can be found here. But, in a nutshell, fluid intelligence is reasoning and processing independant of facts and knowledge. It is distinct from crystallized intelligence, which deals with things like skills and experience. However, the website in the OP seems to refer to it as a measure of general intelligence, which concerns me slightly.
Don't get me wrong, it seems to be a very refined and well-established test, and scoring well is probably something to be happy about. But you shouldn't take it as some ultimate, all-encompassing measure of your entire intelligence.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,752
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,755
Not taking it sorry.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,766
181
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,769
@previous (Metæ)
It thought it didn't go that high?
Are you being sincere, or art thou haveth a giggle?
It thought it didn't go that high?
Are you being sincere, or art thou haveth a giggle?
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,770
I got 117, but I am slightly drunk and playing GTA at the same time. Maybe if I went in sober it would've been higher but eh.(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,771
Want to take this test. What do I do now?!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,782
@647,750 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
If you're getting that high of a score then it's probably based on old scoring criterion not corrected for recent Flynn-Lynn effect changes (i.e. they ripped it off from an older specification of the test) because that should be a lot lower, based on what I've seen of your mostly-unreasoned and frankly, unreasonable arguments.
If you're getting that high of a score then it's probably based on old scoring criterion not corrected for recent Flynn-Lynn effect changes (i.e. they ripped it off from an older specification of the test) because that should be a lot lower, based on what I've seen of your mostly-unreasoned and frankly, unreasonable arguments.
(Edited 52 seconds later.)
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,785
@647,755 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Jews get poor fluid intelligence scoring profiles anyway. I'm not surprised that you're too embarassed to take it.
Jews get poor fluid intelligence scoring profiles anyway. I'm not surprised that you're too embarassed to take it.
!MLHqI35Srs triple-posted this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,786
@647,769 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
That's another indicator that this implimentation of the Raven is mostly fictional or based on a previous version's specification. THE CURRENT ONE MAXES OUT AT 147 BY SPECIFICATION. Getting a 161 on this test, as one user has screenshotted already, should be unfeasable and is thus bullshit.
That's another indicator that this implimentation of the Raven is mostly fictional or based on a previous version's specification. THE CURRENT ONE MAXES OUT AT 147 BY SPECIFICATION. Getting a 161 on this test, as one user has screenshotted already, should be unfeasable and is thus bullshit.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,787
@647,782 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Actually, I think Killer Lettuce is just being modest. His real IQ is probably a lot higher.
Actually, I think Killer Lettuce is just being modest. His real IQ is probably a lot higher.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,788
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
I've no doubt that Killer Lettuce has highly developed verbal skills, but exceptional Raven's scores are, frankly, solid correlates of "worsening" neuromasculinity (in that it's a codified disease by Cohenitic dogma), and given his chosen field, that doesn't seem all too likely.
Intelligence permeates every aspect of personality. He has that more of a Catherine than someone genuinely thoughtful.
I've no doubt that Killer Lettuce has highly developed verbal skills, but exceptional Raven's scores are, frankly, solid correlates of "worsening" neuromasculinity (in that it's a codified disease by Cohenitic dogma), and given his chosen field, that doesn't seem all too likely.
Intelligence permeates every aspect of personality. He has that more of a Catherine than someone genuinely thoughtful.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,790
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,791
@647,782 (!MLHqI35Srs)
The more likely explanation (since we aren't all 130+ IQ) is that the online test sucks and is rigged to give people a much higher result than they actually deserve.
The more likely explanation (since we aren't all 130+ IQ) is that the online test sucks and is rigged to give people a much higher result than they actually deserve.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,793
@647,769 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Serious answer: I can't be arsed to spend 45 minutes on it and there's so many different IQ tests and scoring schemes.
Serious answer: I can't be arsed to spend 45 minutes on it and there's so many different IQ tests and scoring schemes.