Topic: Should Matt be banned for every other week?
Gerbils !5bwKgiJVXk started this discussion 10 years ago #49,796
A week of Matt, a week off Matt.| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, Ban him every other week. | 6 | 67% | |
| No, I enjoy his posts. | 3 | 33% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #647,287
You said you would be a quality poster. Yet you are just the latest in a conga line of shitsonas.
Gerbils !5bwKgiJVXk (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #647,288
@previous (B)I need development time but I do think banning Matt every other week is a quality idea.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,375
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,515
just permaban the faggot again
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,524
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,530
Are you autistic?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,542
I think we should set up a random number generator that spits out a number every midnight and bans Matt completely randomly based on some set of criteria.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,634
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 39 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,638
@previous (I)
Please refer to the rules which clearly states:
Please refer to the rules which clearly states:
9. If a reply does not cite any other reply, it is to be assumed that it is a reply to the OP or to the discussion (so far) in general. It is possible to do "@OP", but this is only to be used, optionally, in the relatively rare cases when you cite other posts and then want to include a comment to the original post/poster in the same reply.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #647,640
I think it is.