Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later[^][v]#87,584
So... It's just like OpenID?
What's the issue here?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#87,586
AMERIKKUR LAND OF DUH FREE
!Neku082OLc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#87,588
@87,584 (B)
It'll be required.
Everyone will know who you are, and exactly where you live, and all of your family.
You wouldn't be Anonymous B.
You'd be whatever your real name is.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#87,592
Source? This article only shows an Official NIST video which shows it a validation system, and not every site would need it anyway.
grey !C.MxxuCiTo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#87,595
I regret voting for this fucker. I thought he was supposed to be a lefty. But with all the internet shit he is passing I wish we could incite the KKK to assassinate him.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#87,599
It's just the government getting involved in OpenID-like systems (I'm not sure what the actual protocol is). They won't even be the server, you can chose from many servers.
You prove your identity to one organization, upon visiting another site, if you need to verify that you are you, they check with the id server and get a "yes".
It appears the only requirement is that you have one, and sites can chose to accept it as validation or not.
If anything, this would be better than having to give sites all my private info. At least now one source will have it alone. No more email validation, no more password memorization, etc.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#87,602