Topic: Sophie, when are you going to realize...
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #49,290
That women rule the world and nature. The only purpose for having a man is for protection and procreation. You embrace evolution and darwinism. You should well be aware that women are nature's default sex. They give birth to new life. Men are merely there to provide their protection, their seed, and to provide basic needs for the woman.
Nature is one gigantic matriarchy that can disguise itself as a patriarchy. It can even trick a majority of women (feminists) into thinking that it's naturally a patriarchy when in reality it's a matriarchy. They, of course, are also aware of this fact. It's called doublethink.
I do not see why you wish to combat nature, Sophie gal.
Nature is one gigantic matriarchy that can disguise itself as a patriarchy. It can even trick a majority of women (feminists) into thinking that it's naturally a patriarchy when in reality it's a matriarchy. They, of course, are also aware of this fact. It's called doublethink.
I do not see why you wish to combat nature, Sophie gal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later[^] [v] #641,309
well equating social politics to natural phenomenon is flawed from the ground up but you are half right males come cheap in nature
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #641,310
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 weeks later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,900
I'm back from hospital, took 4.795 grams of diphenhydramine in overdose, was caught in time to get my stomach pumped, developed intense hallucinations and delusions for a few days in intensive care (which I will subsequently comment upon on my blog), have now been left with some superficial brain-damage (most noted in my superficiality of thought as of late and slightly diminished processing speed), and left with a new diagnosis of what they call "EUPD" in the ICD-10, which is known as Borderline Personality Disorder elsewhere.
As a result of things I don't remember committing prior to the overdose, I've now remerged into even greater legal trouble that I shan't elaborate upon.
Put simply though, I'm quite a mess, so don't expect me to engage in anything intellectual or further than introspectively autobiographical and reflective for a while on my blog. Nevertheless, thanks for what I presume to be a parodic post.
As a result of things I don't remember committing prior to the overdose, I've now remerged into even greater legal trouble that I shan't elaborate upon.
Put simply though, I'm quite a mess, so don't expect me to engage in anything intellectual or further than introspectively autobiographical and reflective for a while on my blog. Nevertheless, thanks for what I presume to be a parodic post.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,904
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,907
@644,900 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> 4.795 grams
Still have yet to learn the value of research.
> have now been left with some superficial brain-damage
In other words Nothing of value was lost
> I've now remerged into even greater legal trouble that I shan't elaborate upon.
Oh come on now. That should be good for a laugh.
> left with a new diagnosis of what they call "EUPD" in the ICD-10, which is known as Borderline Personality Disorder
Wait one minute. You had that before this current attempt.
> Put simply though, I'm quite a mess
Now damn it. You were exactly that prior to this new attempt.
> so don't expect me to engage in anything intellectual or further than introspectively autobiographical and reflective for a while on my blog. Nevertheless, thanks for what I presume to be a parodic post.
Odd that you wrote all that without any of the past word salad.
Looks like this last attempt has actually made you more better.
> 4.795 grams
Still have yet to learn the value of research.
> have now been left with some superficial brain-damage
In other words Nothing of value was lost
> I've now remerged into even greater legal trouble that I shan't elaborate upon.
Oh come on now. That should be good for a laugh.
> left with a new diagnosis of what they call "EUPD" in the ICD-10, which is known as Borderline Personality Disorder
Wait one minute. You had that before this current attempt.
> Put simply though, I'm quite a mess
Now damn it. You were exactly that prior to this new attempt.
> so don't expect me to engage in anything intellectual or further than introspectively autobiographical and reflective for a while on my blog. Nevertheless, thanks for what I presume to be a parodic post.
Odd that you wrote all that without any of the past word salad.
Looks like this last attempt has actually made you more better.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,915
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,918
@previous (F)
His IQ was never high enough for him to determine the necessary amount. Depends on body weight.
His IQ was never high enough for him to determine the necessary amount. Depends on body weight.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,926
@previous (E)
Intelligence levels have little to do with it. High time-orientation/preference, which can span an entire cognitive spectrum, often causes intellectual laziness, a cursory approach to analyzing material, and quick ad hoc rationalizations. Dr. Sam Vankin, who has an IQ of 181, has work riddled with them. My psychiatrist reckons that I'm intellectually able, just, for lack of better words, low endurance and prone to intense emotional and judgemental detours in my thinking.
Intelligence levels have little to do with it. High time-orientation/preference, which can span an entire cognitive spectrum, often causes intellectual laziness, a cursory approach to analyzing material, and quick ad hoc rationalizations. Dr. Sam Vankin, who has an IQ of 181, has work riddled with them. My psychiatrist reckons that I'm intellectually able, just, for lack of better words, low endurance and prone to intense emotional and judgemental detours in my thinking.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,934
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,938
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,940
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,942
@644,938 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Writing has improved. Tell us a little about legal issues.
Perhaps becky can offer you advise.
Writing has improved. Tell us a little about legal issues.
Perhaps becky can offer you advise.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,944
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,951
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,953
@644,900 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> took 4.795 grams of diphenhydramine
Did you do that because your Skype friend told you to?
> took 4.795 grams of diphenhydramine
Did you do that because your Skype friend told you to?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,958
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,965
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 44 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #644,976
@644,953 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I know you are just my NHS psychiatrist in disguise. Fuck off.
I know you are just my NHS psychiatrist in disguise. Fuck off.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,016
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,033
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
What a convenient way to dismissively evade the truth.
Don't worry, I have work planned for when I can recouperate from the insane abuses of the NHS and other facets of the quasi-socialist system not only here, but in the rest of the Anglosphere in addition, sufficiently enough.
Despite urging my acquaintances that I'd intended to sleep, these matters have been plaguing my mind horrendously. I feel like David Chac's Iniquity or Hitler's Zwitesbuch have been combined with some Brave New World Order matrices ("matriarchy", lol) in some Hufschmidtean alternative simultated reality prism, and that, not only has it been deliberately ignored by psychiatric services but ultimately pushed in its contriving as well.
Flattering my language skills when they believe the very contrary (by implication of the nurse's carrying of previous psychiatrist's speculations of my cognitive ability), treating me in a generally infantilistic manner so as to disabuse me of the notion of my transgenderism in the hope that in appealing to me as a "lad" or "gentleman" or place overemphasis on my sensitivity, all whilst immasculating me nonetheless, and then, to pave the cake's icing, get a negroid psychiatrist to pathologically lie (nothing they can be blamed for, it comes naturally to them and he seemed cheerful enough in his strangely alluring cuck-esque manner brimming with charisma; it's like the peaceful, codeine-esque drift with which they can slam they death knell, and a true dualistically themed confrontation of masculine-feminine/negroidal and feminine-masculine/caucasoid spiritualities) about what was said in an intensive care review about my emotional state, no, these Tavistock techniques (something of a double entendre; it is both a childhood gender dysphoria clinic and a propaganda agency, and I suspect, operated by similar parties to the individuals who'd swarmed around me from April to June 2014) by a certain Common Purpose member, a 6'5'' transsexual colleague of Dr. Marr (and these transsexuals and crypto-transsexuals have been all over the ward, trust me; hell, my present psychiatrist is probably one), who already know in advance, by tapping into my internet connection as obtained via. secretive court order, courtesy of British jurisprudence, every word I'm writing now, so really Haselgrove (or however your name is spelt, I'm not the best at novel kike denonymical surnames), why do you even try to out-manouevre me in such a fashion as your contempt would parlay, that in despite being true of my deficiencies in latency, it nonetheless comprises the space by which I'm ironically one step ahead?
What a convenient way to dismissively evade the truth.
Don't worry, I have work planned for when I can recouperate from the insane abuses of the NHS and other facets of the quasi-socialist system not only here, but in the rest of the Anglosphere in addition, sufficiently enough.
Despite urging my acquaintances that I'd intended to sleep, these matters have been plaguing my mind horrendously. I feel like David Chac's Iniquity or Hitler's Zwitesbuch have been combined with some Brave New World Order matrices ("matriarchy", lol) in some Hufschmidtean alternative simultated reality prism, and that, not only has it been deliberately ignored by psychiatric services but ultimately pushed in its contriving as well.
Flattering my language skills when they believe the very contrary (by implication of the nurse's carrying of previous psychiatrist's speculations of my cognitive ability), treating me in a generally infantilistic manner so as to disabuse me of the notion of my transgenderism in the hope that in appealing to me as a "lad" or "gentleman" or place overemphasis on my sensitivity, all whilst immasculating me nonetheless, and then, to pave the cake's icing, get a negroid psychiatrist to pathologically lie (nothing they can be blamed for, it comes naturally to them and he seemed cheerful enough in his strangely alluring cuck-esque manner brimming with charisma; it's like the peaceful, codeine-esque drift with which they can slam they death knell, and a true dualistically themed confrontation of masculine-feminine/negroidal and feminine-masculine/caucasoid spiritualities) about what was said in an intensive care review about my emotional state, no, these Tavistock techniques (something of a double entendre; it is both a childhood gender dysphoria clinic and a propaganda agency, and I suspect, operated by similar parties to the individuals who'd swarmed around me from April to June 2014) by a certain Common Purpose member, a 6'5'' transsexual colleague of Dr. Marr (and these transsexuals and crypto-transsexuals have been all over the ward, trust me; hell, my present psychiatrist is probably one), who already know in advance, by tapping into my internet connection as obtained via. secretive court order, courtesy of British jurisprudence, every word I'm writing now, so really Haselgrove (or however your name is spelt, I'm not the best at novel kike denonymical surnames), why do you even try to out-manouevre me in such a fashion as your contempt would parlay, that in despite being true of my deficiencies in latency, it nonetheless comprises the space by which I'm ironically one step ahead?
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,035
Sophie, why did you do this?
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,038
@645,033 (!MLHqI35Srs)
nobody cares about you enough to obtain a court order to stalk you online dimwit
nobody cares about you enough to obtain a court order to stalk you online dimwit
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,039
@645,035 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Because you are the Luciferian Angel behind "Angela's" seemingly "angelic" piousness in demonic Godhood, deary.
Because you are the Luciferian Angel behind "Angela's" seemingly "angelic" piousness in demonic Godhood, deary.
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,042
@645,038 (F)
More misinformation. You're just compulsively spasming memetic slogans now. "Nobody cares" is the cry of somebody strangely desperate to prove how unimportant the work to expose these agenda are, which is really what this misdirection of the question in an ad hominem manner is really about masking!
More misinformation. You're just compulsively spasming memetic slogans now. "Nobody cares" is the cry of somebody strangely desperate to prove how unimportant the work to expose these agenda are, which is really what this misdirection of the question in an ad hominem manner is really about masking!
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,043
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
no literally nobody cares enough to do that you are paranoid and I think it's unhealthy to put yourself at the middle of a conspiracy theory like that
no literally nobody cares enough to do that you are paranoid and I think it's unhealthy to put yourself at the middle of a conspiracy theory like that
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,044
@previous (F)
So what, do I ignore what they're doing and let them trample all over me? Your gambit's still unconvincing to me, G4S wench.
So what, do I ignore what they're doing and let them trample all over me? Your gambit's still unconvincing to me, G4S wench.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,045
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,048
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,049
@645,044 (!MLHqI35Srs)
> and let them trample all over me?
With attempts at suicide, you do that to yourself.
> and let them trample all over me?
With attempts at suicide, you do that to yourself.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,052
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,053
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,054
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,057
@previous (G)
You talk about being uninformed and I can't help but chortle a little...
You talk about being uninformed and I can't help but chortle a little...
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,060
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,064
Anon Z7 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,065
Autphag.
What are you going to do for an encore?
What are you going to do for an encore?
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,071
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,075
@previous (G)
No. I can deceive men into loving me. And by that, I don't neccessarily mean by lying to them about myself. I can insidiously broach the question and usually it elicits some sort of defensively sympathetic virtuous signalling, and I'll just proceed and proceed in my internet acquaintances with pursuing this matter until such a point as this is successfully attained.
I can wait though. I'm not exactly desperate for the taste of cock or anything and can sacrifice at least some of my impulsiveness in the hope of this resulting in quality partnership.
No. I can deceive men into loving me. And by that, I don't neccessarily mean by lying to them about myself. I can insidiously broach the question and usually it elicits some sort of defensively sympathetic virtuous signalling, and I'll just proceed and proceed in my internet acquaintances with pursuing this matter until such a point as this is successfully attained.
I can wait though. I'm not exactly desperate for the taste of cock or anything and can sacrifice at least some of my impulsiveness in the hope of this resulting in quality partnership.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anon Z7 replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,076
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,086
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,088
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,095
So has r04r been up to her old stalking and harassment tricks with sophie again, or what?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 55 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #645,112
sup faggot, you still slobbing mcwalters fat jellyknob?