Topic: Are we allowed to dox people here?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #4,925
Question is in the headline.
No. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later[^] [v] #87,322
Answer is in the name.
sexual aersolâ„¢ !!mtq555+/1 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,357
dox with sox
Syntax joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 36 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,361
If one is looking to open up can full of worms?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,365
try tc
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,374
I wanted to issue DEF with an ultimatum: Post the name of the school DM was fired from or cease slandering him.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,375
r04r double-posted this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,376
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,378
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,380
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,381
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,382
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,383
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,384
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,385
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,387
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,388
@87,385 (F)
I would ask DM himself these questions but I have been banned from his love-fora. If he persists in claiming that No-one Is Bannedâ„¢, he is lying.
I would ask DM himself these questions but I have been banned from his love-fora. If he persists in claiming that No-one Is Bannedâ„¢, he is lying.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,389
@87,387 (E)
That's debatable. DM makes separate topics for his girlanus/ghoul/begging shticks, whereas DEF post his aspie/dyslexic shtick in every topic.
Meaning DM can be ignored but DEF can not.
That's debatable. DM makes separate topics for his girlanus/ghoul/begging shticks, whereas DEF post his aspie/dyslexic shtick in every topic.
Meaning DM can be ignored but DEF can not.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,390
@previous (A)
It's rather simple to ignore. If you really feel incapable to simply skim over certain posts, find that ignore-by-name userscript and load that up seeing as he always uses a name.
It's rather simple to ignore. If you really feel incapable to simply skim over certain posts, find that ignore-by-name userscript and load that up seeing as he always uses a name.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,392
@87,389 (A)
no, DM did the same thing. ghoul was in every topic. def's posts are extremely easy to spot, even easier than DM's due to the long-winded ness
no, DM did the same thing. ghoul was in every topic. def's posts are extremely easy to spot, even easier than DM's due to the long-winded ness
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,397
@87,390 (r04r)
It is much harder to ignore than a separate topic. If I redacted DEF's post the topic would be broken because there would be so many replies to him etc that nothing would make sense.
It is much harder to ignore than a separate topic. If I redacted DEF's post the topic would be broken because there would be so many replies to him etc that nothing would make sense.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,399
@87,392 (E)
No, DM did his french shtick in every thread, but his his girlanus/ghoul/begging shticks were kept to separate threads.
> def's posts are extremely easy to spot, even easier than DM's due to the long-winded ness
that is not a positive.
No, DM did his french shtick in every thread, but his his girlanus/ghoul/begging shticks were kept to separate threads.
> def's posts are extremely easy to spot, even easier than DM's due to the long-winded ness
that is not a positive.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,411
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,416
@87,390 (r04r)
The ignore function origin is/was the invention of Java book writer David Thau. The idea anyway for a chat tool. For years I would remind people that if they found me so difficult to comprehend or if I upset them....just click the tiny box for ignore. Bianca.com's tools for ignore were of a high level variety. One could find that box on each reply/post and ignore more then just a topic/person/spam/ yet DM would find ways by handle changing for instance to flood the chat making it impossible to use.
Now what I FIND most interesting about all the whines about my crappy English is ---Y do so many people dig down way down and quote some aspic of my text? They tell me in one reply they cannot fathom one word I type yet later in the threads they are quoting me ver bait em.
@87,392 (E)
Of course - So when I for instance see someone who is posting replies or topics and I find them on a regular basis to put up ---how is this for example
I am just not a fan of Ponies and there b many on Chans - do you see me
Less is more - I however r from the school of more the better. You should learn as I and just pass me by from now on ~K~
@previous (F)
LOL now you have done it....You do know that kind of reply will not help you win friends or influence people
Anonymous A (OP)
Its good to be thinking again it takes a Village to Make this Planet
The ignore function origin is/was the invention of Java book writer David Thau. The idea anyway for a chat tool. For years I would remind people that if they found me so difficult to comprehend or if I upset them....just click the tiny box for ignore. Bianca.com's tools for ignore were of a high level variety. One could find that box on each reply/post and ignore more then just a topic/person/spam/ yet DM would find ways by handle changing for instance to flood the chat making it impossible to use.
Now what I FIND most interesting about all the whines about my crappy English is ---Y do so many people dig down way down and quote some aspic of my text? They tell me in one reply they cannot fathom one word I type yet later in the threads they are quoting me ver bait em.
@87,392 (E)
Of course - So when I for instance see someone who is posting replies or topics and I find them on a regular basis to put up ---how is this for example
I am just not a fan of Ponies and there b many on Chans - do you see me
ever
whine? I pass the topic or replies in threads rite on by. It takes a village to make this World and it seems to me Ponies have their place. I am a fan of Huffington a quality rag on net. Do I read all who publish there? Shooot I have a R/L and work for a living and have no tyme to read all I want so I skim- or pass authors on by that offer less for me.Less is more - I however r from the school of more the better. You should learn as I and just pass me by from now on ~K~
@previous (F)
LOL now you have done it....You do know that kind of reply will not help you win friends or influence people
Anonymous A (OP)
Its good to be thinking again it takes a Village to Make this Planet
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,417
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,442
@87,388 (A)
I R not banned from that forum and I did put up what you wanted to be put up. Free speech my ass. He removed the suggestion to ask ME to name the joint.
So again for the 25th time....Is it really a good Idea to post the place? It is buried over at TC. If I do it in the open here what happens?
School with limited staff gets a mass of phone calls because so many have free calling plans. If I were on their end, what would I think? Its probably going to happen anyway. Deal is I AM not a mean SOB. Of course I have my targets, but what I try and not do is get others hit by the flak. If Eels or another decides to get next to the target then he is fair game as well. He did send me multiple messages telling me why he wants stuff to stay on the cool side, nor can I really disagree with him - Except of course if the purpose of a Chan is for open and honest or dishonest dialog. I offer up mostly the honest variety and what I DO NOT want to be doing is only ragging on DM here.
Geeeeesuss H Krist - If it really is too much for the community at hand the community has a way of saying as much. For instance some time ago the community was fed up with SCAT content- Thank the Gods....that content keeps me from daily lurking at Gullibles. I lurk but far less often as result.
IF community told me they have had nuff of me ragging on DM? I pay close attention I really do. So when for instance you are fed up enough just rag on Mods or Sysops - they then can say Cool it.....Anyone with any history on me knows that if I do not care for a limit or rule I just move on - honest I do. There is a forum currently begging me to come back - posts and email ...but nooooooooo wayyyyy - They posted a rule, I followed it 100% to the letter of the law. Not even close to any edge and THEY pulled my post which was historical content with much work (saved on my hard drive)
OH AND the owner of the forum made a topic level request for me to post the information!!!!!!!
Pulling that told me they do not need me anymore - So I elsewhere waved by by and good luck - Forum ground to a halt lol
Now you have enough here to know how to get me to cool it. Simple enough cause I like communities that police themselves and all I ask for is fair play with rules posted - Shit any Chan using the great English rule could can me in nano seconds by a bot lol
I R not banned from that forum and I did put up what you wanted to be put up. Free speech my ass. He removed the suggestion to ask ME to name the joint.
So again for the 25th time....Is it really a good Idea to post the place? It is buried over at TC. If I do it in the open here what happens?
School with limited staff gets a mass of phone calls because so many have free calling plans. If I were on their end, what would I think? Its probably going to happen anyway. Deal is I AM not a mean SOB. Of course I have my targets, but what I try and not do is get others hit by the flak. If Eels or another decides to get next to the target then he is fair game as well. He did send me multiple messages telling me why he wants stuff to stay on the cool side, nor can I really disagree with him - Except of course if the purpose of a Chan is for open and honest or dishonest dialog. I offer up mostly the honest variety and what I DO NOT want to be doing is only ragging on DM here.
Geeeeesuss H Krist - If it really is too much for the community at hand the community has a way of saying as much. For instance some time ago the community was fed up with SCAT content- Thank the Gods....that content keeps me from daily lurking at Gullibles. I lurk but far less often as result.
IF community told me they have had nuff of me ragging on DM? I pay close attention I really do. So when for instance you are fed up enough just rag on Mods or Sysops - they then can say Cool it.....Anyone with any history on me knows that if I do not care for a limit or rule I just move on - honest I do. There is a forum currently begging me to come back - posts and email ...but nooooooooo wayyyyy - They posted a rule, I followed it 100% to the letter of the law. Not even close to any edge and THEY pulled my post which was historical content with much work (saved on my hard drive)
OH AND the owner of the forum made a topic level request for me to post the information!!!!!!!
Pulling that told me they do not need me anymore - So I elsewhere waved by by and good luck - Forum ground to a halt lol
Now you have enough here to know how to get me to cool it. Simple enough cause I like communities that police themselves and all I ask for is fair play with rules posted - Shit any Chan using the great English rule could can me in nano seconds by a bot lol
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,447
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,449
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,451
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,455
@previous (A)
Nor did I imply you were
After all how could you be re the ban at Gullibles. One would think they would ban thee. I do use a Canuck IP when I post there and Eels is most aware.
Nor did I imply you were
After all how could you be re the ban at Gullibles. One would think they would ban thee. I do use a Canuck IP when I post there and Eels is most aware.
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,456
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,458
@previous (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
I R Not so Dyslectic in my reading content so you will not see me often using that as an excuse. I am multitasking with lots of work and I failed to hover over he @prev to see it was directed to OP-----My Mistrake
I do see the Ghosts of Eels here lol
I R Not so Dyslectic in my reading content so you will not see me often using that as an excuse. I am multitasking with lots of work and I failed to hover over he @prev to see it was directed to OP-----My Mistrake
I do see the Ghosts of Eels here lol
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,508
@87,388 (A)
> I have been banned from his love-fora
You're either mountainman or that guy who went around insulting everyone and rabble-rousing. Either way, you're a bit of a bellend.
> I have been banned from his love-fora
You're either mountainman or that guy who went around insulting everyone and rabble-rousing. Either way, you're a bit of a bellend.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,524
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Last I looked only two people were banned over there and MM was one - forget who the other one is/was
Whats hard to understand is why OP who is banned is so insistent and pushing me to produce stuff OP could explain.
It would be one thing for someone from THERE to troll me here looking for.....but it cannot be an agent for Matt because it seems that info is the last thing DM wants spread. Frankly I fail to understand exactly why. One gets a job one loses it. Someone could remind DM that he actually posted about applying for the gig and even said where....A surprise followed after that even while he was still waiting to here from the school re hire or not.
So OP please explain why are you so insistent?
Last I looked only two people were banned over there and MM was one - forget who the other one is/was
Whats hard to understand is why OP who is banned is so insistent and pushing me to produce stuff OP could explain.
It would be one thing for someone from THERE to troll me here looking for.....but it cannot be an agent for Matt because it seems that info is the last thing DM wants spread. Frankly I fail to understand exactly why. One gets a job one loses it. Someone could remind DM that he actually posted about applying for the gig and even said where....A surprise followed after that even while he was still waiting to here from the school re hire or not.
So OP please explain why are you so insistent?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,577
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,704
Anonymous K double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,706
@87,524 (Syntax)
Asking DM is pointless. He doesn't want the info out and will deny everything. Either tell us what you know or SHUT UP
Asking DM is pointless. He doesn't want the info out and will deny everything. Either tell us what you know or SHUT UP
Anonymous K triple-posted this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,707
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,710
I've dropped some of sim's dox before, so I guess it's fine.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,757
@87,706 (K)
What info? He said he never worked there. So
Denial is not a River in Egypt.
What info? He said he never worked there. So
other
then the issue of too many people calling, it would not be an issue.Denial is not a River in Egypt.
drea mworks joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #87,778
Yes
Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #88,112
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #88,610
@87,757 (Syntax)
that's my point you tard... he says he never worked there. You say he did. PROVE IT OR END YOUR SLANDER
that's my point you tard... he says he never worked there. You say he did. PROVE IT OR END YOUR SLANDER
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #88,618
ITT: DM obsession and stalking.