Topic: FAO: r04r
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #49,135
Feature request: being able to review personal messages you have sent.
Far too often I have sent a drunken reply to Becky or Meta and have not been able to go back and look at the embarrassing crap I wrote while I was off my tit drunk. This would be a nice feature so that I know how embarrassed I should be the next time I show up here and message one of them. If you find time to do this, that would be a great addition to the board.
Far too often I have sent a drunken reply to Becky or Meta and have not been able to go back and look at the embarrassing crap I wrote while I was off my tit drunk. This would be a nice feature so that I know how embarrassed I should be the next time I show up here and message one of them. If you find time to do this, that would be a great addition to the board.
TTEH !FFSTTEHV7. joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #639,883
Guess the PM number. If, for example, becky sent you a PM with number 37525, and you replied immediately, try http://minichan.org/private_message/37526 and if you're right, you can read your reply. Sometimes you have to slowly increment to get the right one, but it is possible to see PMs you have sent this way.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,884
r04r joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,885
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,888
@previous (r04r)
Well, I have to wait for one of them to reply and quote me to figure out what kind of drunk ass shit I wrote to them initially.
Anyway, I would just like to put it on the wish list for something in the future.
EDIT: Oh I see what you mean... You're assuming I don't wake up in some haze being barely functional. I guess I could wait until I'm mostly functional to review my old posts, but a button to review them would really be cool.
Well, I have to wait for one of them to reply and quote me to figure out what kind of drunk ass shit I wrote to them initially.
Anyway, I would just like to put it on the wish list for something in the future.
EDIT: Oh I see what you mean... You're assuming I don't wake up in some haze being barely functional. I guess I could wait until I'm mostly functional to review my old posts, but a button to review them would really be cool.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,890
@previous (A)
Like tteh said, the idea is that you take the number of the PM they sent you, then start incrementing it one by one to find the PM you sent in response, since you do have access to read PMs you've sent. There just is no listing for them, I'll add that to the todo list.
Like tteh said, the idea is that you take the number of the PM they sent you, then start incrementing it one by one to find the PM you sent in response, since you do have access to read PMs you've sent. There just is no listing for them, I'll add that to the todo list.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!ZwtbVjser joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,894
@639,883 (TTEH !FFSTTEHV7.)
Okay, I just tried this...
Apparently, I told Becky she was a "valuable human" and that there is "no shake" in getting a "psychological tune-up".
At least I am nice when I'm drunk. In a hamfisted sort of way. :')
Okay, I just tried this...
Apparently, I told Becky she was a "valuable human" and that there is "no shake" in getting a "psychological tune-up".
At least I am nice when I'm drunk. In a hamfisted sort of way. :')
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,895
@639,890 (r04r)
Okay, I've had some coffee now. I'm mostly sane. I'll work with that method. It seems pretty straight forward.
Okay, I've had some coffee now. I'm mostly sane. I'll work with that method. It seems pretty straight forward.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,896
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,897
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,898
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,900
What do I not understand not so much?
https://minichan.org/private_messages
They only go away when I on occasion drop cookies.
https://minichan.org/private_messages
They only go away when I on occasion drop cookies.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,901
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,902
@previous (r04r)
OP
I look at this for a past record of PM's
https://minichan.org/private_messages
They will remain until you drop your ID. (clear cookies etc etc etc)
OP
I look at this for a past record of PM's
https://minichan.org/private_messages
They will remain until you drop your ID. (clear cookies etc etc etc)
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,903
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,904
@639,901 (r04r)
> Now try being coherent.
Nice example of your coherency by failing to point that out to OP
Just Saying
> Now try being coherent.
Nice example of your coherency by failing to point that out to OP
Just Saying
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,906
TTEH !FFSTTEHV7. replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #639,909
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,910
@639,902 (E)
Yes, you can see what you received, but you can't see what you wrote. In modern email terms, it's like there's an inbox but no sent folder. I'm not confused about seeing PMs. I'm looking to find a way to see sent PMs. TTEH seems to have mostly solved that for now.
Yes, you can see what you received, but you can't see what you wrote. In modern email terms, it's like there's an inbox but no sent folder. I'm not confused about seeing PMs. I'm looking to find a way to see sent PMs. TTEH seems to have mostly solved that for now.
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,911
@639,909 (TTEH !FFSTTEHV7.)
Its not like I am perfect. OK Missed that.
Funny how TC has this - a full record of received and sent.
Scatchan had that as well.
So OP is totally correct and the rest of us are not.
Its not like I am perfect. OK Missed that.
Funny how TC has this - a full record of received and sent.
Scatchan had that as well.
So OP is totally correct and the rest of us are not.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,912
@previous (E)
No, clearly you're blind as a bat and likely retarded as well. No one has claimed this feature (specifically: a list of sent PMs) exists. Because it doesn't. Instead a workaround was proposed, which works. And over here @639,890 (r04r) I said I'll add implementing this to the todo list. Now, fuck off.
No, clearly you're blind as a bat and likely retarded as well. No one has claimed this feature (specifically: a list of sent PMs) exists. Because it doesn't. Instead a workaround was proposed, which works. And over here @639,890 (r04r) I said I'll add implementing this to the todo list. Now, fuck off.
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,913
@previous (r04r)
> No one has claimed this feature (specifically: a list of sent PMs) exists. Because it doesn't.
> I'll add implementing this to the todo list.
> No one has claimed this feature (specifically: a list of sent PMs) exists. Because it doesn't.
> I'll add implementing this to the todo list.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,916
@previous (E)
You just cited two parts of my message. Both are, indeed, correct. I assume that at this point you are no longer trying to make a point, but are just aimlessly flailing at your keyboard and mouse?
You just cited two parts of my message. Both are, indeed, correct. I assume that at this point you are no longer trying to make a point, but are just aimlessly flailing at your keyboard and mouse?
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,918
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,919
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,920
@previous (A)
I've always been confused about trolls who act like they're retarded. Ok, you've trolled me into believing you are an utter retard and to disregard anything you say. Yay?
I've always been confused about trolls who act like they're retarded. Ok, you've trolled me into believing you are an utter retard and to disregard anything you say. Yay?
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,921
@639,919 (A)
Naw just failed at multi-tasking. 50% of brain is busy with work I am supposed to be doing.
40% is busy trying to latch on2 opportunity China has presented to US stock market
10% to fast chan stuff and as you can see that is on this chan a total fail - On another I put out some bait so cannot say if I catch what I am after.
Naw just failed at multi-tasking. 50% of brain is busy with work I am supposed to be doing.
40% is busy trying to latch on2 opportunity China has presented to US stock market
10% to fast chan stuff and as you can see that is on this chan a total fail - On another I put out some bait so cannot say if I catch what I am after.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!ZwtbVjser replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,923
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #639,924
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #639,943
@639,920 (r04r)
Wait, where's this coming from? I'm just replying to Anon E not knowing what is going on.
Wait, where's this coming from? I'm just replying to Anon E not knowing what is going on.
r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #639,945
@previous (A)
Either OP can't read, they are retarded, or they are trolling by appearing stupid. Read all of anon E's posts in this thread and tell me that comes from a sane person.
Either OP can't read, they are retarded, or they are trolling by appearing stupid. Read all of anon E's posts in this thread and tell me that comes from a sane person.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #639,947
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #639,979
Is r04r or is becky more of a cold hard bitch? not sure