Minichan

Topic: I denounce everything, sans Aspergianism and anti-matriarchalism

!MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #48,966

And since Autphag was shtick, this leaves the slate clean to just acknowledge me as I am: the incorpereal body of profound ideas marking the essence of an Aspergian spirit brimming with racial consciousness and ancestral ennuoa.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #638,164

k, cool

thanks for keeping us in the loop

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,177

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,197

@OP
Nice shitpost.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,199

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Whom?

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,201

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
"Autphag", AKA "Sophie", word salad spouting psychopathic pants shitter extraordinaire. Thanks.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,204

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Those names are unconnected and bare no material relation to each other.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,209

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Keep dreaming.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 56 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,210

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
see @638,204 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Obviously you are a bit hard of comprehension.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,226

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Projection is a tactic commonly used by psychopaths.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,230

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I'm at no confusion of where we stand from which projection of such could be possible, Miller.

But there is no such entity as a dick, I assure you.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,231

why don't you drop the matriarchy thing too because it's nonsense

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,237

@previous (E)
No. Not a more lucidly coherent and internally cogent elucidation of such a phenomenon could've ever taken place than from the proverbial tip of my quill.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,238

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
quail? don't you mean quill?

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,240

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I'm pretty certain that this is the word I saw in my head; obviously it wasn't the one I had written.

My apologies. It has been accordingly rectified.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,245

@638,230 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Whom's "Miller"? Is he, in fact, an associate of that "Matt" person whom you keep sperging about? Thanks.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,246

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I like how you use fictions as interjections, especially after the word "associate" and before "of". Simply and adorably hilarious, Matt.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 40 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,265

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
You are becoming paranoid. I am not, in actual fact, "Matt". Please stop this retarded crusade, before you make yourself look even sillier than you already do. Thanks.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,269

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
> Matt's defensiveness intensifies

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,270

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Whom is "Matt"? You seem very reluctant, indeed, to answer this simple question.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,271

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I would like you to substantiate the delusion that there exists, even in the fictio legis, an entity by the name you keep incessantly dropping.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,272

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Cram it, faggot.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,274

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
That's what I thought.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,398

A speech I'm in the process of writing, which I'll read some time in the course of today's latter parts:

Let me first dedicate this address to the Aspergian to the seminal mentor who'd given conceptive fruition to my ideological consciousness in the initial, whom I've been most negligent, effacing, and outright impertinent in my disrespect of, and have accordingly issued the highest of apologies pending their acceptance as of the morning of this New Year's day, when issuing a correspondence in the stead of its spirit.

It is now the day proceeding thereforth, and although ultimately and certainly less than stalwart in punctuality, it bares the importance that not much more than a singular voice in defending the bulwark of Aspergian ideology beyond the domineering canvas of neurodiversitarian doctrinarianism which stands as a pervasively imperialistic adversary to our independence-centered goals, stands to speak on behalf of those disenfranchised by a falsely dichotomized entity as the psychiatric-neurodiversity struggle, that in actual fact is an insidiously covert and cryptic alliance that needn't have struggled, such as it was to speak least for their secretly buoyed advantageous levy over us at the hands of political forces heightened in presidence, for its domination at all.

In thanking those who have propelled away from the meagrest, earnest and modest beginnings this anti-neurodiversitarian enclave of Aspergianism, may I extend my warmest gratitudes to those associates who've been newly united with me this year, and even more warmly to those amongst you who have returned, against the fray of their misgivings, to the fold. Indeed, manifold struggles have frustrated the advancement of all aspects of our cause, right down to the continued disemphasis on a style of education, as has become too insipidly noxious in insiduity in the West, conducive to the acculturation to heightened sensibilities and sentimental sensitivities a sense for the artistically-driven flair that has not merely been reduced to a quasi-scientific, post-modernistic orthodoxy of effeminately divine supremacist gynocratic sympathy-baiting penny-terrible and historically distorted hagiographies of a non-existent persecution against an always perspicaciously and brilliantly evasive and victim-playing matriarchal hegemony.

This year shall be a year in the emphasis of that all-gritty and catchily pithy quip of the imageboard's memetic slogan, "spread the word!" But ours will have a different spin on the perspective thereof, in that we refuse to beckon to the mandate of memetic conventionality, so we must make meaningful the demographic targeting, selectively and with perceptiveness in our appeal, not befallen to the folly of mass preaching, of our plebiscitical adherents, ensuring a force less commensurate in the meaningless scale of these numbers and more in their significance as self-independently standing constituents.

In other words: the movement's graft cannot any longer lean on popular power as its sole dependency, compelling itself a shift towards cognizant brawn in ideological consciousness, reinforced by the qualities of those so adhering. The terminal limit between quality and quantity has seen itself too rapidly fallen short, with each deceleration of our movement's momentum. We must with more vigorous fervence rejuvenate and galvanize the propelment of our front-line ranks.

An ideological component to the movement driven by a patriotically heart-felt conviction and devotion to the fruition and cultivation of our own thoughts in the style conducive to its elucidation and clarification in a way most congruentially fitting with the grasp of our understanding and enhancement of new meta-political understandings therewith can never be under-emphasized, for it is a major tennet of Aspergian ideological practice. However, it is probably now to be just as keenly apprehended that, as refreshing and gritty as a propositionally-rooted basis in "our thoughts unto themselves" might seem, we must specialize now in more than the cognitive if it is, as David rightfully proclaims, to be a political tendency capable of gaining traction.

Cognition is but one central aspect integral to our key ideological processess. Existing within one's headpsace an incorpereally, cognitively driven entity does not mark singly slur nor dint of defect against, and, contrarily, may serve enhancingly strengthening the morality. For, in an Aspergian conception of socio-dynamic wiles, unfettered by Hobbensian chains of felicitarian obsessive-compulsions with 'heirarchical placement' ala neurofeminine pathology, one's principally integral values internalize themselves freely thereof thus. Practice of these principles, however, may stand to see themselves an impoverishment of domain, which could do everything to undermine their seeming integrity, speaking internally with respect to cognitively internalized morality, and afford us less than a position from which we may engage in advocacy our righteous convictions.

Mobilization, consolidation, orchestration, and organization of forces, motivated by a devotedly convicted zeal to carry out in application with the heighest vain and respect for preservation in every aspect of practice our principles, without respect to a misleading allure of slavish obedience that might cause us to slip into perfunctorily dreaded tedium, though nevertheless with a steadfastly striving stride towards the fullest demonstration of unbeknownst brilliance to our detractors that we could muster yet, and by whatever means -- military, economic, infrastructural, and even on the smallest scales, for any possession would be seen as huge boons to the disillusionment of neurotypical contempt against us -- we may procure these provisions and commissions for ourselves, then by all of them shall we endeavour to achieve, whether by dint of graft, or skin of teeth.

Thousands upon thousands, if not millions overall, across the Anglospheric morass of matriarchally bought-and-paid-for docility via. the Masonically controlled welfare-dependency apparatus, live lamentably a life of existentially meaningless dreck, whether rendered so materially, by the attraction of material accoutrements, or psychopharmaceutically, by the attrition of the mental state, weakening its resolve to subdued uselessness. A pitiful lot, for a scarily universal scale of an unprecedented phenomenon in the life of the Aspergian in its post-DSM, pathogenesis-ensnared era. Our only promises to the recovery of your independently creative capacity lies in our request to you, which you'll find in the process of doing and then having done so a neccessity in hindsight: abandon your drugs, abandon the empirically brainwashing retardation dispensers of "video game console"-simulated reality, abandon that you've deceived to belong with among your kin, those "compatriots" amongst your family are more likely than not neuro-homogenistically mercenary sell-outs thwarting your evolutionary independence, beholden to a psychiatric manumit that has unleashed their total control against you, rendering you ceaselessly dehumanized and disassociated from the self, a "slave" in the purported illusory "freedom" of community release, upon which your psychotropic drugging may, in many cases, be predicated.

Isn't it just ironic that in devotion to such a cause as ours, and the discipline required therein, that you may find yourself an infinitely more awakened and emancipated being than in that which you've endlessly rationalized as a niche for existence, used against and unto yourself in pacification? You may've never considered such an existence's reality beyond the most superficial of trappings until enviasging such a wonderous beauty as that which has until now lain merely in the mind's eye of the highly impassioned Aspergian cadres amongst your counterparts.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,401

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
m8

kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,404

Stop taking stimulants

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,405

@638,398 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Reminder that "Aspergia" is basically, in fact, just this man's version of CWCville.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,408

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
David and I have managed to procure land for a compound, and I now have 4 benefactors for my migration to America. Watch this space!

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 26 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,409

@638,405 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
You should be Big Damlol Derek, because you hand them out regularly to Autphag.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,410

@638,408 (!MLHqI35Srs)

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,411

@638,408 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Reminder that "David" is either a figment of this man's diseased imagination, or someone attempting to troll him into cutting off his own balls.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 24 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,412

@638,409 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
You're a bit of a retard if you think that this man is anything other than a sad, overcompensating heckler, who can't stand to see his own stake in the matriarchy dissipate to the sands of obscurity.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,415

@638,404 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I can be as over-stimulated as I please. I intend on taking even more drugs, on top of drugs, on top of drugs, for these aren't the drugs of the matriarchal hospital-industrial complex's import, oh no no no, Mansonian "spirituality-facilitating, mind expanding apparatuses" are completely permitted as a practitioner's wherewithal within Aspergian ethical lore.

Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,416

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Imma mad shaman brah.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,417

@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
My Shamanic prowess outstrips yours by far.

Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,418

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Orly?

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,422

@638,417 (!MLHqI35Srs)
Shamanism isn't real.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,424

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I once successfully hexed a femalewhore. You, as ever, must demonstrate your bluntness of wit not only intellectually, but that of your prescience spiritually.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,427

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Spirituality isn't real either. Why, praytell, are you using Wizardchan maemaes?

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,429

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
We'd covered your usage of the technically-illegal entity that I can't even litigate against in your clear contravention of Minichan's use, due to its non-extant nature, lest, you'd've been banned by now.

Further to your question though, Wizardchan is not memetic and neither is the culture, specifically speaking, exclusively channocentric dreck like the rest, so its arcaneity redeems itself.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,434

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
"Femalewhore", as a maemae originated, in fact, upon Wizardchan. Thanks.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,436

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
1. It wasn't the first source of my exposure thereto.
2. It's just a fucking portmanteau, not exclusive intellectual property.

It'd've been different could I claim something so neologistically unique in phraseology, but that particular word doesn't fulfil such a criteria.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,438

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
It originated, in fact, opon Wizardchan. Why do you keep trying to dispute facts?

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,439

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
You know, I think of your possible motivations behind dropping antiquainted dox, and it occurs to me that it's the same reason behind your visual and literary rape of Emma Watson, as well as your general immorality, criminality and sinuousness.

Facts are negroidal, sir.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,440

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
I have never, in fact, mentioned Emma Watson. You're letting your imagination run away with you. Thanks.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,441

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
You didn't, except, of course, in your scatophilic and child pornographic literary fiction.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,442

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
> Everyone is Matt

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 41 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,443

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
> Everyone who once bore fictio-legis salad still bares that same salad

Takes talisman negro logic to know the same.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,444

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
You keep making these statements, which, presumably, you feel to be "facts". This amuses me, since, as I am sure you may recall, you earlier stated that "facts are negroidal". You are being, indeed, by your own logic, in fact, negroidal. Thanks.

(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,446

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
There are facts and then there are "facts". Remember that the definitions between conventional and properly formalized uses of this term differ considerably: the former lends itself to axiom, which is incorrect; the latter, which I'd explicated some few weeks ago, are merely the end-product of previously reasonably considered means.
No need for me to have given you a crash course in the critical philosophical thinking you most sorely lack.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,451

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
There are only, in actual fact, facts. Thanks.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,453

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Nice negroidal "fact"oid.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,454

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Cram it, faggot.

!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,457

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Someone's lost their frustration tolerance.

But I persevered and it paid off handsomely, here's the rest of my now-completed speech which shall be read later today when I've sufficiently recharged:

Though, young Aspergian, may you yet unsafely tread these damningly precarious times as they impendingly unfold. Let it be told, in relaying paylays of that already experienced by us but may not hold appeal to you in the anecdotal, so it is a game we shall play by appealing to other senses, though, not without reference to those recollections of the happenstances that had with certainty most veritably already broken.

Before I break into the self-indulgently reminiscent though, let me posit to you something of a proposal. Despite heavily enfoisted Aspergian intransigence and lassitude from the earliest days, it is insistently misstated a dangerous possession of autonomous individuality within the midst of our person's confines, and on the basis of these proclamations, violently are attempts made to stifle and isolate us socially, breaking into a disenfranchisement of mistrust to the point of emotionally broken stir-madness ourselves, to which extent it is then wondered, rather nervefully brass-necked on the part of the purportedly "caretaking" tard-wrangler, why an acting out among our sort proceeds thereforth. To add insult to injury, in abusing an ubiquitous memetic construct, we are literally freedom-cucked, that is forced to observe that vicariously what we've been denied, by everyone, to the inclusion of our own kin, somehow considered infinitely more human by virtue of this lacking "protected status"; further to this insulting effrontery, those of other "protected statuses" such as the aberrosexual, and again we may witness this amongst our own supposed filial quarters, are given a putrescently pestilential tutelage over their own most revoltingly insipid sexually expressive "openness", really a form of stomach-rendingly wretched exhibitionism by any other name, lorded over filthfully the Aspergian, who thus far, in wake of all these iniquities, find themselves, by manner of deliberation of collusion within the afore-described forces, simply further emotionally deprived. You may go and even seek resolution for your own sexual incongruities, to find yourself at lacking avail owing to a deeply embedded matriarchal agenda that, upon such a rejection, you find yourself awaken to in realization: progressivism is a franchise, for which you are to be regarded only worthy of being kept back at impasse, whilst they, salaciously, derisively, and barely able to contain their own mockingly contemptuous disdain, forge once again a justificational pretext on the basis of a misdirection rooted in purposeful over-magnification and disproportionately-blown emphasization of a so-called "condition", such as yours, which had been entirely crafted for all the socially proscriptive and conspiratorially-induced isolating purposes to break you further to this point of regression such that they are now saying needs an even further punishing treatment: psychotropic intoxication. For being an intersectionality, as that between aberrosexual and autist, you are deemed merely deserving poison, in a way other, anointedly "pure" aberrosexuals, are "ascended" to a status of genuine political insulation, safeguarded from similar hardships.

It is the Jewish moral principle come to life. "What's good for us, is bad for them". A protected status as ascribed in belonging to the Asperger, does not have the same implication as those protected statuses harboured by the rest of the diversitarian franchise given affordances thereto, and therein lies the hypocritical perfidy of liberalism. You have, as an Asperger, been baited-and-switched the rigged coin-flip; yours "rights" are to the negative and predated against you, whilst theirs, and only as ever, "rights" to the universally positive politically buoyed and enfranchised. These legal codifications are merely extensions of their medical predicates, itself a fiction of a different sort, and especially when we concern ourselves with the inherently politicized apparatus of psychiatry. Medically predicated upon the constriction of all Aspergian determination on a legally sanctioned basis is the general descriptive paramaterial predicates with which it has seen its pathologization metamorphize into socially prejudicial pathogenesis -- Aspergian determination is now seen only by the neurotypical regimes which preside over us as a societal plague rather than one of the many benefits of liberal egalitarianism, even if this tacit logical extrapolation is hidden under miles of insipid rhetoric, much of it enabled on both sides by the neurodiversitarian saboteurs.

It should be in our work, thus, to remove the primary dependency upon which our continued persecution perpetuates itself: integrationalism. In having been integrated within the societal monolith, so society has used its trappings, already described and elucidated in detail, to further ensnare us. If you dare try to circumvent the more egregious thereof, you are labelled an anti-social renegade and guilt-tripped into moral conformity, the speciousness therein, given the entirely "received" nature of these moralities, speaking for itself. Those who espouse to integration may well indeed preponderate the enlightened among ourselves in number, but it is worth keeping this in mind about those Aspergians who have taken it upon themselves thus: these treacherously parasitic curs have thus reneged on their status as Aspergians, resigning themselves to the rank of mere spergs, analogous to the difference between a Black and a "nigger" or "coon". To them, they are excommunicatively disposed of so that they may not fetter the movement with their burdensomely lecherous and usurious weight, trying to play both sides of the diversitarian pantheon's coin.

To death with the sperg, and forever shall we persevere in our upholding indigenous Aspergian values stylistically carried in manner true to the form of our pre-psychiatrized ancestral forebares, many an Aryan, Mongol hordesman, and Eurasian bearer of the racially-originating brood of evolutionarily hypermale nation -- to disassociate from the endocrinally intoxicated dreck we are most often conflated with -- among them.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 40 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #638,464

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
If "Aspergia" is, indeed, your CWCville (which, in actual fact, it is), then whom, praytell, is your Sonichu?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.