Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,715
@previous (hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc)
Do you think it's had a positive affect overall? I hope you're feeling better!
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,716
@previous (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
i don't think it helped that much. i'm slightly happier, probably. i do forget a lot of shit though, which is a side effect. i also have deja vu a lot, like once a day, which is really odd. thank you :')
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,717
@OP
If you are not, at this very moment, vaping the very finest 80/20 eLiquid™, at 6mg nicotine level, in a Uwell™ Crown™ eTank™, attached to a Reuleaux™ RX200™ eDevice™, and are, indeed, not chucking the sickest tits imaginable, then, in fact, I genuinely pity you. Thanks.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,718
I know someone who got over depression induced failure to thrive with electroshock
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,719
@637,716 (hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc)
That is odd. Prior to the ECT had you sought other forms of treatment? Not trying to pry into your personal business, just curious.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,723
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,725
@637,719 (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
yeah i've been on anti-depressants for a while, like 6 years (i'm 21 now), and they don't work as well as i would like so i tried ect for 3 (!) times a week, i think 4-5 weeks
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,728
@637,718 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
"Failure to thrive" is a condition of poor progression in the developmental cycle caused by an infant's malnourishment, either as an advertent consequence of complications in feeding, or an unintended one of negligent starvation.
I'm unsure if you meant this.
I'm also unsure if you shouldn't be endorsing my addition of 13 new pages to the already 5,000 word long Your Iniquities, my latest letter to the psychiatrist, sub-titled accordingly, "a correspondence on the role of the Fabian, Trotskyist, and socialistically matriarchal intrusions of strongarmed grappleholding against the neck of the last cognizantly autonomous endorser of Aspergian spiritualism in any of its forms, per their constituent ideals’ advocacy by the author’s mentorship, their refusal of identifying mention herein acknowledged, and how the addressee, and predecessors thereto, complicitly colluded therein".
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,729
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Look up geriatric failure to thrive.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,731
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,732
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
What does it mean?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,733
@637,729 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
But is not geriatricness a condition of recension downwards from having previously thrived?
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,734
@637,732 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
It means, gentlesir/madam, that I am, in actual fact, exhaling, into the atmosphere, clouds of prodigious volume, and, indeed, density. Thanks.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,735
@637,733 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
kind of. I mean all aging is a downwards progression
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^][v]#637,745
things could be worse. i'm spending new years in hell. but there's a party at the pool cabana and there is a ton of pussy in hell. like, seriously, the ratio of women to men is like 6 to 1, what the fuck is up with that? anyway i'm not complaining it's just something i noticed.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#637,746
@previous (squeegee)
SO THERE IS DIVINE RETRIBUTION TO BE EXACTED AGAINST THE MATRIARCHY!
Thank Gd.
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#637,747
I hope you enjoy the vending machines full of Pepsi that were created from aborted fetuses. I'll be having Coke.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#637,751
@637,746 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
"God" doesn't exist, and neither, in fact, does this "matriarchy" thing that you keep trying to hang your inadequacies upon. Stop waving your victim card around like a pants shitting mongoloid. Thanks.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#637,752