Minichan

Topic: Alexander Gillaspie recently wrote to his friend Ginger, who'd been the one that'd introduced us

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #48,908

He is my publisher for The Wisdom:
You know of my educational background in the arts and languages. Given Sophie's relatively inchoate training, nay, remarkable for what's otherwise an entirely almost absent formal grounding, s/he has the philo-logical depth of an upcoming Hume, or Neitzche, or even the dreaded Engels. My investment into this Aspergia movement has a personal connection for me. I'd never known that it was the condition which was creating those problems, of organized ostracization, and intentionally colluded marginalization; the matriarchy's establishments had always displaced that back onto me. Gaslighting is what that is, dear. It all makes sense to me at last, and should strike a kindling sentimental s bonfire of hope in the belief at last that its struggle was not delusional, and not only real, but heard. Sophie's work has the potential to dismantle a destructive co-opting by social justice of our sort. This is why I love her, and why she's the only transsexual woman whose pronouns I'll respect

-- Gillaspie, to Ginger, on Skype, Boxing Day.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #637,389

> Gillaspie
> Gillon aspie
Nice lie

Try to be more creative next time lol

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,392

> s/he
lol

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,393

@637,389 (B)
Incorrect. Here is a Skype screenshot proving he exists, at least.
Also look up the surname 'Gillaspie'. Although I can understand your concern, I did think he was a troll, perhaps a sockpuppet of Ginger, myself, upon initially being introduced to him.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,394

@637,392 (C)
As a bona fide Aspergian he of course refuses to believe logically in the viability of such a thing as gender incongruity, making an exception for me as a matter of the impression he sustained by the profoundness of my works.

(Edited 35 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,396

you do not need your ego to be fed like that
Sad

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,397

@previous (D)
I need all the support I can get so that you can break away, in embracing the Aspergian ideals of politico-cultural thought and philosophical intrigue, from that noxiously entrapping matrix of your ideologically influenced crippling to politically conscient receptive awareness.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,399

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
sorry u feel that way

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,401

@637,393 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Over 9000 hours in Paint.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 56 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,402

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Less than 3 seconds, to conceal his avatar so that you know not which one he is upon trying to procure his contact request's acceptance for trolling purposes.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,404

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Thanks.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,405

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I've warned him pre-emptively. Thanks.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,440

Ur dropping these names like they mean anything

My mate Bob in the pub said my arise tattoo was grate, so I'll go publish that should I

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,441

@previous (G)
He has connections which could propel my work. You have nothing, which only serves to perpetuate your meaninglessness. Cheers.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,442

i could be wrong, but there's pretty epic potential here. (gets popcorn ready)

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,457

@637,441 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I have, in fact, just spoken with him on Skype. He says that you are, and I quote, a "deranged psychopathic retard", and a "pants shitting, word salad vomiting failtranny", whom he intends to "troll into cutting his own balls off lmao". How does this make you feel?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,458

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Proof?

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,459

Externally hosted image@637,457 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
pm me his contact info, we just got wifi in the cabanna

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,460

@637,458 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I thought you said proof was a psychpathic neuronegroidal concept or something.

@previous (squeegee)
Done. Thanks.

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,461

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
imperialistic corroborative reliances(sic) i do believe. but it doesn't matter, even if you presented proof he'd still deny it

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,462

@previous (squeegee)
Erm, "[sic]"? I think not, Google says:
archaic
a person or thing on which someone depends.
plural noun: reliances

Although, as emphasized, it is antiquainted, there was indeed a plural noun form; not that I needed to prove this myself, having the instinctual linguistic reasoning prowess to understand plurals do actually exist in most instances to modify basic noun forms.

My god, aren't you illiterate!

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,464

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
antiquated : very old and no longer useful, popular, or accepted : very old-fashioned or obsolete
obsolete : no longer used because something newer exists : replaced by something newer

get with the times and learn to speak english like an adult and not a pretentious teenager who takes 45 minutes to look up in what arcane and unused context he can claim to be correct

(Edited 22 seconds later.)

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,468

@previous (squeegee)
Thank

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,471

@previous (I)
more word no one uses in today's modern world. get with it, grandma

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 12 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,544

@637,441 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

Lmfao my cock is big enough to propel me into the air if I spin it but u don't see me bragging

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,547

@previous (G)
With such a lowly enduring thrust as yours, it'd be just as futile an endeavour as regarding anything of your existence meaningful, normalfag.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,565

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

Golly gosh that's sure me told

Ur bragging about some faggot nobody knows giving you praise

What does this say about u

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,620

@previous (G)
It's not about who knows him or who he knows, it's about what he does and what he'll do.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,626

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

Which is nothing

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,634

@previous (G)
I'm sure you're totally clairvoyant enough to discern that.

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,645

@637,620 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
He trolls pants shitting mongoloids into castrating themselves. Thanks.

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 16 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,832

@637,634 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

I am actually, I am famous throughout the land for my ability to sniff bully bullshit

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,873

@637,634 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
a dude with aspergers rambling about 'the matriarchy' and praising your delusion for being close to his own isn't going to go anywhere/do anything, I assure you
Except for maybe achieving laughingstock status

Anonymous J double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,874

@637,634 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
and it doesn't take a clairvoyant. just a slight grasp on reality and some pattern recognition
you dumb shit

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,876

@previous (J)
There's nothing about your IQf that suggests to me you're capable of this non-existent pattern recognition prowess that you boast of yours.
@637,873 (J)
Except these aren't mere ramblings. They are composed with respect to a style more reminiscent of a regaliant time when retrospection wasn't a byword for something squeamishly avoided.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #637,885

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
They are, in actual fact, incoherent ramblings. He's copying your posting style to lure you in, and you, predictably, indeed, are falling for it like the gullible pants shitting mongoloid that you are. Thanks.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #638,084

@637,876 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
yes the prowess that I boast of mine.
your such mastery of your English
lol I am not boasting anything it's borderline common sense
and I'm pretty sure incoherent rambling is incoherent rambling in any century bucko
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.