Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: How come no browser can beat Chrome?

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #48,873

Microsoft is getting close to making a tolerant browser with Edge and even IE11.
Firefox feels sluggish more now than it ever has been in the past. It now tries to imitate Chrome's layout.
Opera is essentially just Chrome now with WebKit and an imitation layout.

Chrome just seems to run faster and smoother than all of the competition.

Why does it feel like we have to result to using a botnet for stability?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #637,034

chrome sucks tho

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,036

Vivaldi is pretty much the best browser to exist at this point, vastly outclassing Chrome in terms of performance and usability, even while still in beta. Opera guys did a damn good job with it :) (should be noted that most of Opera's team quit the company and now works on this thing, and also that while it's based on Blink, it's about the furthest thing from a ho-hum Chrome derivative one can find)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,037

@previous (C)
Vivaldi always runs so slow and takes too long to load up for me.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,038

I use both FF and Chrome.

Hate the extra step on a pc to use bookmarks with Chrome.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,039

Okay, Vivaldi certainly got faster during Beta 2.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,042

Vivaldi uses Chrome apps and extensions?

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,047

@OP
Enjoy your Google spyware.

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #637,052

@637,039 (A)

> Okay, Vivaldi certainly got faster during Beta 2.

Yeah, Techincal Preview 4 was kind of a dog but from the pre-beta snapshot builds on it was pretty spiffy.

@637,042 (A)

I don't know about apps, but Vivaldi definitely supports Chrome extensions. I'd personally recommend uBlock Origin and Web of Trust.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #637,057

@previous (C)
CIRC installed just fine and it didn't remember my settings from the one I installed with Chrome so I guess this answers my next question as to rather or not it is separate.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #637,062

Is it possible to password protect the Vivaldi web browser?

Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #637,065

@previous (A)

> Is it possible to password protect the Vivaldi web browser?

I have no idea. If it's using an extension, it should probably work roughly the same way it does in Chrome. Otherwise, idk.

RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 18 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #637,321

AdBlock does not work fully on Chrome. Therefore, Firefox is the best. Thanks.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,477

@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Isn't uBlock better than adblock though?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #637,479

@previous (A)
It's a bit of a matter of perspective. Chrome with uBlock immediately triggers my shitty laptop's fans whenever I start up the browser. I can run Firefox (with adblock and a number of other add-ons) all day without draining much in the way of processor time. I don't know what uBlock (or Chrome itself) is doing in the time I'm not actually using it. I haven't run a packet sniffer or reverse engineered it to figure that out, but Chrome is resource hungry where Firefox is fairly resource generous. Firefox can get uppity, but it's usually pretty simple to sort out.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.