Minichan

First and foremost, I am not a neurodiversitarian, so in perhaps risking in pander towards psychiatric reform a nod towards the legitimation of its institutional processes, and potentially its very existence by extension, unlike anyone of their ilk, you will neither see me explicitly champion its role in enabling the so-called “patrticipation” of the autist in the mistaken belief that there exists a wider communitarian context in which integration can take place (let alone that integrationalism is valid), nor shall psychiatry be assured in the confidence that I purport to support its own validity in the whole.

In not being a neurodiversitarian, I don’t believe it is the inherent right of neurotypicals to arrogate themselves a position of anointment in the practice of double-standards which ultimately only serve to advance their own image, or societally preponderant overshadowing umbrage in casting its prominence politically speaking. Put forth and simply, diversity’s misunderstanding as inextricable with the processes of equality simply cannot follow.

Diversity, if its practice was genuine as proselytized by the neurodiversitarian lot, would not entail the increasing preponderance of women infiltrating the condition as a course of diagnostic criterion manipulation, nor would they endorse the latter, entirely an enfoisted political process of feminist politicization of scientific methodology (an intended reversal of psychiatry’s explicit intention back to the Soviet’s use thereof ala the psykushkas, with Asperger’s the new “sluggish schizohrenia”, a pseudo-disorder used against dissidents) that has been used to achieve the former; diversity, had its implementation come with sincerity in intention, would not additionally have involved the duality of privilege and prejudice coming with the diagnostic association’s connotations, whereby it is nowhere near as stigmatizing when attached to a female as it is when done so against a male.

Asperger’s merely stands in substitute of the popular misandrist expression of the orthodoxy’s political decorum, in wishing to sacrifice a large number of society’s least desirable, particularly when baring a Y chromosome (or even, in the case of one individual I knew whom, for this reason, was denied resolution of gender-incongruential phenomena, any number of Y chromosomes), though not necessarily by a truly eugenic consideration, rather than in the subjugation and brutalization of already debased peoples being akin to beating a dog outwith its cage, then seeing its good behaviour continue only within the cage; it is abused into a demand for its own institutionalization, as we are also.

This extends itself not only to the institutional implications of such a diagnostic entity but its psychiatrically repercussive ramifications. How it is treated is often dependent, though not explicitly on sex, for to admit this would be acknowledging the mutual inclusivity of the franchise for the sufferance of sexism (when in reality we know, per the reported proclamations of feminist gospel, that only women are, not only capable but also potentially so of being, alleged victims thereof), but rather, whether these matriarchal Archons consider one a worthy target of contention, sublimination and the perpetration of damage control towards, with this, the Y chromsome, acting as the bull’s eye of invitation thereto. For it has been placed on a status of having committed sinful heresy in a past sworn to have been attested by the menstrual blood of oppressed forebears, claims completely sanitized of propagandization, spin, role-reversing auto-persecutory histrionics, and the like, I swear massa (or rather, that we’re not merely trying to justify our retribution of usurping as the new massas).

Short of castration, which might actually provide excessive and undeservedly forgiving blessing to these mere creatures of the duskily burdensome, every other disabling procedure must be employed on the contingency of this phallic ownership, a talisman by no other name in the consideration of ubiquitous penis envy the holistically encompassing harmonic equilibrium of divinely feminine elemental kindling with our beneficient pantheon, which the evil, soulless autistic lacks balance therewith honestly, I could punch the face of my own parody of radfem rhetoric.

An order of infantilization in all but physical form must take pervasively, if perniciously, in the order of the day, administered with the strongest of neuroleptics in our employ if we are to propter-hoc and retroactively “prove” the bumbling inferiority of the doppel-hypermasculine that we assure you isn’t a delirious contrivance of our fevered imaginations, or our most malignantly strange of metaphysical fetishes with the existentially inverse-Neitzchean. We promise! (She — my strawman which is suspiciously starting to sound like me en-femme — says with that moan of salaciousness, the kind a self-induced “rape” victim lets out when you know their tacit admission to its enjoyment and deservance.)

In rationalization thereof, we are assuredly to our disposal no dearth in the dispatch of antagonizing forces through which we can let steam of our passive-microaggression fetishes, through which we can elicit a response we shall misinterpret as undue anger in “clinical justification”, punishing in a form true to the kind of bait-and-switch for which our sadistic wiles are known. Permanently branding-marked as a brandishing slur against one’s credibility will this be in a mixture of our crass, off-the-record speculation, and our on-the-record inscription, your rap-sheet of thought crimes veneered medicinally, of our masturbatorily exhibitionist inverse-persecution fantasies in the vein of a really bad Christine Summers novel of those, nevertheless however false, accusations bequeathed the lasciviously warm breath of our godly repute (and equally so in the impunity with which we may use this anchoring of you to go unreproached in our whorish orgies future perpetrations of the same), customarily ingrained into a gospellous cannon, rendering unto them an irredeemable life to the permanence of your independence’s (at least where it’s concerned more than nominally, in any substantive decision making) deserved death-sentence!

Keep in mind though, that our voyeuristic forays in intellectual ablation and mental infantilization exclusively confine themselves in our imposition against males.

Lacking the wishbone of conventionally regarded demonic evil deterministic of masculine sex, you will more than likely be free of the threat of such pseudo-diagnostic, covert-stratifying libel, and even in recipience thereof, it only having nominal (meaning insignificant and in reality, no clinically significant) importance to the entails of your imposed medical regime, you may nevertheless be freely to avail in your ascension upwards of the 9 stages of matriarchy’s heavens!