Topic: A daily Aspergian wisdom quotation promotion spread
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #48,648
I'll situate the most salient ones juxtaposed to an image of my countenance each day from here on.We have seen the unfurling of a neo-Autphagean renaissance in anti-matriarchal and indigenously autistic thought.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #634,837
Arse arse arse arse arse
Adam Jensen joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,858
Poor typesetting
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,861
Usual autphag shtixj,,
advanced, though
advanced, though
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,866
@OP
Why do you look like a mongoloid?
Why do you look like a mongoloid?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,867
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I am in fact a Mongoloid (big m, as in the racial group), of the mixed -Caucasoid hybrid sort.
I am in fact a Mongoloid (big m, as in the racial group), of the mixed -Caucasoid hybrid sort.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,874
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
So that's not just loose skin flaps hanging over your eyes because you lost so much weight? I think it is.
So that's not just loose skin flaps hanging over your eyes because you lost so much weight? I think it is.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,877
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
That's probably compounding such an appearance as to exaggerate it, but I've always had this feature, irrespective of this.
That's probably compounding such an appearance as to exaggerate it, but I've always had this feature, irrespective of this.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,879
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,883
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
If I was clever enough to make an "illusion", why would my intellectualism be a false encumbrance of it?
This is what never made sense to me about the childish slur of "pseudointellectualism". I've since just co-opted it tongue-in-cheek.
If I was clever enough to make an "illusion", why would my intellectualism be a false encumbrance of it?
This is what never made sense to me about the childish slur of "pseudointellectualism". I've since just co-opted it tongue-in-cheek.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,886
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Do you like Oblivion?
Tje best part is when you fight Dagon. fuck that four armed prick. make due with two arms, you utter arsehole
autphag, i think you are an okay scotsman. but stay in the uk.
Do you like Oblivion?
Tje best part is when you fight Dagon. fuck that four armed prick. make due with two arms, you utter arsehole
autphag, i think you are an okay scotsman. but stay in the uk.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,887
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah, that's not happening. I'm not a "man", I'm genetically only 3/4 Caucasoid of which about a 1/4 if you're lucky is of the Scots group of the Celtic sub-group, and my provisions to where I'm headed are progressing apace.
Yeah, that's not happening. I'm not a "man", I'm genetically only 3/4 Caucasoid of which about a 1/4 if you're lucky is of the Scots group of the Celtic sub-group, and my provisions to where I'm headed are progressing apace.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,888
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,956
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,231
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)Because majority-Caucasoid is 'White enough' usually. Hypodescent is deliberately ignored by them.
<-- New wisdom nugget
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,232
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,233
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Lies, you read it and silently nodded in sullen assent, 'yes, mistress'.
Lies, you read it and silently nodded in sullen assent, 'yes, mistress'.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,234
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,236
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,239
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,241
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,269
|βʒ| Meowth joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,299
@OP
You are fucked.
You are fucked.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #635,301
I think you're adorable.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 days later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,674
I did say these were daily but as of late have I been most inadvertently neglectful, thus, I hope it is per your enjoyment in your perusal of this replenished dispensiary of momentary wisdom.Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,676
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,677
@636,674 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
What sort of education do you have that allows you to denounce all of modern science?
What sort of education do you have that allows you to denounce all of modern science?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,679
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
My internal logic is the only qualification requisited, seeing as all other appeals to such stand fallaciously in apocrypha thereto.
My internal logic is the only qualification requisited, seeing as all other appeals to such stand fallaciously in apocrypha thereto.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,680
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,681
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Absence of admission does not mean presence of denial.
Another fallacy.
Absence of admission does not mean presence of denial.
Another fallacy.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,683
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Can you perhaps appreciate how it might be difficult for others to accept one person's claim that all of modern science is wrong?
You're one person without any further education on science, against a group of people that have continually asvanced humanity's technology and knowledge. Can you see how some might not just take your word that your "internal logic" disproves science?
Can you perhaps appreciate how it might be difficult for others to accept one person's claim that all of modern science is wrong?
You're one person without any further education on science, against a group of people that have continually asvanced humanity's technology and knowledge. Can you see how some might not just take your word that your "internal logic" disproves science?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,684
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> without any further education...
Stopped reading there. Your inferrence of this was based on a fallacy.
It is in that you have a hard time envisaging another person's internal logic that perhaps your inherent intellectual suitability for the education imparted into you by methods of rote pedagogy is deficient enough to sufficiently prove the latter to be a waste of time in your case.
Meanwhile, somebody genuinely intelligent rejects the institutionally authoritarian edificial artifices of the establishment in pursuit of their own enlightened research, in light of having debunked the entire methodological process, so it is now conducted in their own vein; archaism over mundaneity, esoterics over exoterics, the truth of endo-extrapolative self-revelation over untrustworthy systems of the "given" and inherently uninspired, or for that matter, uninspiring.
Please go back to your dormatory, emotionally immature and vindictive child.
> without any further education...
Stopped reading there. Your inferrence of this was based on a fallacy.
It is in that you have a hard time envisaging another person's internal logic that perhaps your inherent intellectual suitability for the education imparted into you by methods of rote pedagogy is deficient enough to sufficiently prove the latter to be a waste of time in your case.
Meanwhile, somebody genuinely intelligent rejects the institutionally authoritarian edificial artifices of the establishment in pursuit of their own enlightened research, in light of having debunked the entire methodological process, so it is now conducted in their own vein; archaism over mundaneity, esoterics over exoterics, the truth of endo-extrapolative self-revelation over untrustworthy systems of the "given" and inherently uninspired, or for that matter, uninspiring.
Please go back to your dormatory, emotionally immature and vindictive child.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,686
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Rejecting an authority doesn't necessarily make you right, or necessarily make the authority wrong.
But okay, tell me about your own enlightened research. What do you research? In what ways is it superior to modern science? Seeing as you presumably lack comparable funding, peer-review, equipment and an extensive history of prior research to draw upon.
Rejecting an authority doesn't necessarily make you right, or necessarily make the authority wrong.
But okay, tell me about your own enlightened research. What do you research? In what ways is it superior to modern science? Seeing as you presumably lack comparable funding, peer-review, equipment and an extensive history of prior research to draw upon.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,687
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Those aspects were all covered in the refutations of modern science contained in that particular chapter of the Wisdom of Autphag pamphlet.
Essentially, stripped of verbiage, it argues that if science needed all of the above, then it cannot fulfil the pre-requisites of scientific inquiry because of a methodological contrivance that's rooted in its need for various forms of manipulation, whether that be of capital (funding; implicitly as a consequence, institutional approval), corroboration (peer-review was repeatedly exposed to have Jewish origins and chaired largely by Jewish-coerced, regulated and monitored academics, who deliberately encourage an abandonment from fluidity in approach, consequently resulting in malpractice of replication, from overly fixated ideological interpretation), technological (from the patents to the "impliments" as I've called them in my work, are all tools resultant of aforesaid imperialistic influences), or an "extensive history of prior research" (which post-Enlightenment abandonment of idealism means nothing given the flawed nature of these ideologically coercive pseudoscientific influences), because it ceases being a genuinely emenating naturalistic process, rigidly deferring to imparted, given, meaningless thought on superimposed lines of ideologically politicized practice, running antithetical to the original spirit of science.
Q.E.D.
Those aspects were all covered in the refutations of modern science contained in that particular chapter of the Wisdom of Autphag pamphlet.
Essentially, stripped of verbiage, it argues that if science needed all of the above, then it cannot fulfil the pre-requisites of scientific inquiry because of a methodological contrivance that's rooted in its need for various forms of manipulation, whether that be of capital (funding; implicitly as a consequence, institutional approval), corroboration (peer-review was repeatedly exposed to have Jewish origins and chaired largely by Jewish-coerced, regulated and monitored academics, who deliberately encourage an abandonment from fluidity in approach, consequently resulting in malpractice of replication, from overly fixated ideological interpretation), technological (from the patents to the "impliments" as I've called them in my work, are all tools resultant of aforesaid imperialistic influences), or an "extensive history of prior research" (which post-Enlightenment abandonment of idealism means nothing given the flawed nature of these ideologically coercive pseudoscientific influences), because it ceases being a genuinely emenating naturalistic process, rigidly deferring to imparted, given, meaningless thought on superimposed lines of ideologically politicized practice, running antithetical to the original spirit of science.
Q.E.D.
(Edited 50 seconds later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,688
@OP
you make me ashamed of being diagnosed with aspergers
you make me ashamed of being diagnosed with aspergers
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,689
@previous (I)
Good, you as a neurodiversitard make me ashamed of being misdiagnosed with Asperger's, you make me ashamed of the image of deferrential dependency onto your NT sugardaddies and his insipid little welfare bureaucracy you all inevitably exude as you make continuous recourse to your fictional, misandry-borne disability, and lastly, you make me depressively and inconsolably mournfully ashamed of the sitting duck status you're content to revert in occupation to, acting attractively as a target for matriarchal predation against you that I'm beginning to wonder might be well deserved in the circumstance of your counterrevolutionary and systemically subservient lethargy.
I hate you, I hate all Asperger's sufferers, the only reason I was diagnosed with this fucking bullshit condition was because my mother had a pathological hatred of me. I AM A FUCKING TRANNY THERE'S NO FUCKING WAY IN GOD'S GREEN EARTH THAT I HAVE ANYTHING REMOTELY RESEMBLING A NEUROMASCULINE BRAIN. Schizophrenics, frankly, more often defer to internal delusional logic in deliberate contravention of cultural convention than the autist and its insipid rotistic negroidital screeds of Aristotlean, logicist, technocratic worship.
Good, you as a neurodiversitard make me ashamed of being misdiagnosed with Asperger's, you make me ashamed of the image of deferrential dependency onto your NT sugardaddies and his insipid little welfare bureaucracy you all inevitably exude as you make continuous recourse to your fictional, misandry-borne disability, and lastly, you make me depressively and inconsolably mournfully ashamed of the sitting duck status you're content to revert in occupation to, acting attractively as a target for matriarchal predation against you that I'm beginning to wonder might be well deserved in the circumstance of your counterrevolutionary and systemically subservient lethargy.
I hate you, I hate all Asperger's sufferers, the only reason I was diagnosed with this fucking bullshit condition was because my mother had a pathological hatred of me. I AM A FUCKING TRANNY THERE'S NO FUCKING WAY IN GOD'S GREEN EARTH THAT I HAVE ANYTHING REMOTELY RESEMBLING A NEUROMASCULINE BRAIN. Schizophrenics, frankly, more often defer to internal delusional logic in deliberate contravention of cultural convention than the autist and its insipid rotistic negroidital screeds of Aristotlean, logicist, technocratic worship.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,691
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
what the fuck are you on about. looks like you have serious mental issues, beyond just being an aspie.
what the fuck are you on about. looks like you have serious mental issues, beyond just being an aspie.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,697
@previous (I)
I'm so sorry please let me take that back I'm just really really upset and couldn't contain myself because it triggered me greatly, this conspired-against and deliberately plotted pseudo-diagnostic categorization of my person into deserved isolation and actively agitatively propagated social stigmatization amongst the rabble to deliberately ostrasize me, as they would in their continuous sermons to my (neurotypical, I was mainstreamed) classmates about my faux-'condition', which would only attract their disdain and hazing attempts. Please, please forgive me, I couldn't help but be moved to enraged fury by your mistaken identification of this as something that should be redeemed. I'm sorry for hurting all the Aspies, I wouldn't want that to happen to me and it shouldn't happen to anyone, the neurotypicals, matriarchy, socialists, and forces of the serpent's gatekeeping secret already disproportionately target and mis-emphasize the necessity to pathologize us as it is. I'm crying, I don't know what to do, and I can't stop, i'm sorry..
I'm so sorry please let me take that back I'm just really really upset and couldn't contain myself because it triggered me greatly, this conspired-against and deliberately plotted pseudo-diagnostic categorization of my person into deserved isolation and actively agitatively propagated social stigmatization amongst the rabble to deliberately ostrasize me, as they would in their continuous sermons to my (neurotypical, I was mainstreamed) classmates about my faux-'condition', which would only attract their disdain and hazing attempts. Please, please forgive me, I couldn't help but be moved to enraged fury by your mistaken identification of this as something that should be redeemed. I'm sorry for hurting all the Aspies, I wouldn't want that to happen to me and it shouldn't happen to anyone, the neurotypicals, matriarchy, socialists, and forces of the serpent's gatekeeping secret already disproportionately target and mis-emphasize the necessity to pathologize us as it is. I'm crying, I don't know what to do, and I can't stop, i'm sorry..
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,698
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,699
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,701
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,702
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Matt, you're the last person qualified to reprimand the psychopathy of anyone but their own.
Matt, you're the last person qualified to reprimand the psychopathy of anyone but their own.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,707
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,708
"Good, you as a neurodiversitard make me ashamed of being misdiagnosed with Asperger's, you make me ashamed of the image of deferrential dependency onto your NT sugardaddies and his insipid little welfare bureaucracy you all inevitably exude as you make continuous recourse to your fictional, misandry-borne disability"
That's some deep stuff right there.
That's some deep stuff right there.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,709
the ignorance in this thread is fucking stunning.Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,710
@636,708 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
Expect nothing less from someone with a deeply entrenched sense of consciousness who uses it without end to perceive acutely one's surroundings and circumstances.
It was something ingrained into me through the various layers of persecution, one of the few benefits imparted thereby.
Expect nothing less from someone with a deeply entrenched sense of consciousness who uses it without end to perceive acutely one's surroundings and circumstances.
It was something ingrained into me through the various layers of persecution, one of the few benefits imparted thereby.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 32 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,711
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,713
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
no, what i mean is that every time you open your mouth you say the stupidest fucking things i've ever heard in my life you unimaginable retard. that's what i meant, just didn't want to leave you confused and thinking i was talking about anyone other than you being stunningly ignorant.
no, what i mean is that every time you open your mouth you say the stupidest fucking things i've ever heard in my life you unimaginable retard. that's what i meant, just didn't want to leave you confused and thinking i was talking about anyone other than you being stunningly ignorant.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 9 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,714
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,716
@636,713 (squeegee)
Deflecting your own frustration at being unable to grasp the most rudimentary concepts?
Why am I not surprised that this would translate into an ostensible display of superiority that's merely nothing more than forcefully bullish machismo of the most negroidally basal sort?
I was under no confusion as to whom you were referring but in all honestly, the attitudinal dismissiveness in the matter all points to your stupidity laying at blame. The reason you can't 'imagine' a 'retardation' of my magnitude is because you can only delude yourself of your own intelligence, despite lacking a truly envisaged conviction within that.
Deflecting your own frustration at being unable to grasp the most rudimentary concepts?
Why am I not surprised that this would translate into an ostensible display of superiority that's merely nothing more than forcefully bullish machismo of the most negroidally basal sort?
I was under no confusion as to whom you were referring but in all honestly, the attitudinal dismissiveness in the matter all points to your stupidity laying at blame. The reason you can't 'imagine' a 'retardation' of my magnitude is because you can only delude yourself of your own intelligence, despite lacking a truly envisaged conviction within that.
squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,720
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,726
@previous (squeegee)
I think you have autism of the lowest functioning, 'callous atheist' severity.
Take your fucking risperidone you super-negroidally nth-dimensionally inconceivably overmasculinized imbecile.
I think you have autism of the lowest functioning, 'callous atheist' severity.
Take your fucking risperidone you super-negroidally nth-dimensionally inconceivably overmasculinized imbecile.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,730
@636,687 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I would point out how good-practice scientists note any potential influences, but I think any chance for a halfway rational conversation evaporated when you claimed that peer-review was controlled by the Jews. Goodbye.
I would point out how good-practice scientists note any potential influences, but I think any chance for a halfway rational conversation evaporated when you claimed that peer-review was controlled by the Jews. Goodbye.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,731
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
You had precipitated the erosion of this conversational dialogue by your own reluctance and unwillingness to keep a balanced and receptive decorum on certainly protectively-regarded "pet ideas". That isn't a sensible discussion, but if anything, an evasively flouncing behaviour that, anyone has any wonder why as to this, arouses rightful suspicion.
C'mon. You're literally faciliating conspiracy theorist paranoia with such reticence.
You had precipitated the erosion of this conversational dialogue by your own reluctance and unwillingness to keep a balanced and receptive decorum on certainly protectively-regarded "pet ideas". That isn't a sensible discussion, but if anything, an evasively flouncing behaviour that, anyone has any wonder why as to this, arouses rightful suspicion.
C'mon. You're literally faciliating conspiracy theorist paranoia with such reticence.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,732
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,733
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Laugh in among yourselves, you're only collectively making scientifically-aligned types look like utterly self-unaware imbeciles, incapable of appreciating the irony of their own hubris.
Laugh in among yourselves, you're only collectively making scientifically-aligned types look like utterly self-unaware imbeciles, incapable of appreciating the irony of their own hubris.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #636,734
@636,731 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I'm sorry. The Jews must control my sense of judgement too. If only I could be like you and reject modern education, whilst insulting every human being I encounter. Then I would have a true understanding of the world.
I'm sorry. The Jews must control my sense of judgement too. If only I could be like you and reject modern education, whilst insulting every human being I encounter. Then I would have a true understanding of the world.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)