Topic: Should fat parents that raise fat children go to fat people jail?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #48,633
I think they should. America is going to need alot more jails though
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #634,595
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,597
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,598
I guess fatfuck filler's parents, and fatfuck, should be in jail.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,600
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,618
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,711
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Matt's dad? He's in prison... Tax evading faggot just like his son.
Matt's dad? He's in prison... Tax evading faggot just like his son.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 34 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,720
i mean, why not take it a step further and go for the food companies that produce garbage
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,724
Or we could send them to Africa and they could lose the weight real quick.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,725
They should go to special fat jails.
Said jails could save money, since they would need fewer bars for the cells.
Said jails could save money, since they would need fewer bars for the cells.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,733
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,736
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,737
@previous (hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc)
First of all, its just as easy to eat youself fat with non fast food. Also, how would you even start to ban certain food items? Too much salt, sugar, fat, etc? That would hit tons of "gourmet" restaurants as well.
First of all, its just as easy to eat youself fat with non fast food. Also, how would you even start to ban certain food items? Too much salt, sugar, fat, etc? That would hit tons of "gourmet" restaurants as well.
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,743
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> First of all, its just as easy to eat youself fat with non fast food
oh ok
> Also, how would you even start to ban certain food items? Too much salt, sugar, fat, etc?
place regulations on fast food like you would on tobacco products
> That would hit tons of "gourmet" restaurants as well.
gourmet restaurants ≠ fast food. low-income households can't afford to eat at gourmet restaurants as much as fast food restaurants
> First of all, its just as easy to eat youself fat with non fast food
oh ok
> Also, how would you even start to ban certain food items? Too much salt, sugar, fat, etc?
place regulations on fast food like you would on tobacco products
> That would hit tons of "gourmet" restaurants as well.
gourmet restaurants ≠ fast food. low-income households can't afford to eat at gourmet restaurants as much as fast food restaurants
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,744
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,745
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,752
@634,743 (hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc)
Oh okay isnt a valid comeback
What type of regulations?
So you would make it harder/more expensive for poor people to eat?
Oh okay isnt a valid comeback
What type of regulations?
So you would make it harder/more expensive for poor people to eat?
hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,757
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
oh ok.
regulations on advertising would be a start.
i didn't say anything like that. i'm saying gourmet restaurants wouldn't be affected because they aren't fast food. i brought up low-income households because they're more likely to suffer from obesity (http://frac.org/initiatives/hunger-and-obesity/why-are-low-income-and-food-insecure-people-vulnerable-to-obesity/)
oh ok.
regulations on advertising would be a start.
i didn't say anything like that. i'm saying gourmet restaurants wouldn't be affected because they aren't fast food. i brought up low-income households because they're more likely to suffer from obesity (http://frac.org/initiatives/hunger-and-obesity/why-are-low-income-and-food-insecure-people-vulnerable-to-obesity/)
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,843
@previous (hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc)
the poor don't have as much access to high quality foods. if you want to do something to help poor people not be fat then you'd look to improve the number of grocery stores in poor areas. when there's a 7-11 on every corner and a McDonalds for every block, and no grocery store for 8 miles, that's where the problem starts. it's a lack of options, not too many options, that makes the ghetto fat. making it more expensive to eat poorly will only further harm the poor, it certainly won't magically transport them to the market to buy fresh fruits and vegetables.
the poor don't have as much access to high quality foods. if you want to do something to help poor people not be fat then you'd look to improve the number of grocery stores in poor areas. when there's a 7-11 on every corner and a McDonalds for every block, and no grocery store for 8 miles, that's where the problem starts. it's a lack of options, not too many options, that makes the ghetto fat. making it more expensive to eat poorly will only further harm the poor, it certainly won't magically transport them to the market to buy fresh fruits and vegetables.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,851
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,907
@634,757 (hamfist !0Ynig1RSDc)
You'd have to define fast food and and you really couldn't regulate some food for levels or sodium, fat, and sugar without regulating other forms of premade food.
Also you would further restrict the food options for poor people in fresh food deserts.
You'd have to define fast food and and you really couldn't regulate some food for levels or sodium, fat, and sugar without regulating other forms of premade food.
Also you would further restrict the food options for poor people in fresh food deserts.