Topic: Matt should stop appropriating the word salad properties of their rights-reserving individuals
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #48,609
Cheers.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later[^] [v] #634,422
@OP
Whom's Matt?
Whom's Matt?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #634,425
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Someone Sophie wants to have a threesome with, along with Bert, his new man.
Someone Sophie wants to have a threesome with, along with Bert, his new man.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #634,427
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,429
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,431
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I almost don't doubt that Sophie is like a buffalo bill style nutjob halfway to making a skin suit but that would be kinda transphobic so I'm not gonna go there
I almost don't doubt that Sophie is like a buffalo bill style nutjob halfway to making a skin suit but that would be kinda transphobic so I'm not gonna go there
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,432
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I hate the matriarchy, I don't desire to co-opt their superficial features thinking it adorns a sense of superiority that I've repeatedly proclaimed is non-existent.
Buffalo Bill, on the other hand, was the stereotypical vaginal-pedastal worshipper.
I hate the matriarchy, I don't desire to co-opt their superficial features thinking it adorns a sense of superiority that I've repeatedly proclaimed is non-existent.
Buffalo Bill, on the other hand, was the stereotypical vaginal-pedastal worshipper.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 41 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,433
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,435
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,436
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 13 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,437
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,438
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 second later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,439
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,441
@634,436 (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
but yeah the one you are currently upholding and worshipping for whatever reason
but yeah the one you are currently upholding and worshipping for whatever reason
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 23 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,443
@634,438 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
That would be nice, if either thing applied:
(1) A patriarchy doesn't exist, :.
(2) Even if I was a man, I couldn't partake in it;
(a) I'm not a man therefore,
(b) I cannot partake in a non-existent patriarchy.
Q.E.D.
@634,439 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Isn't it just?
That would be nice, if either thing applied:
(1) A patriarchy doesn't exist, :.
(2) Even if I was a man, I couldn't partake in it;
(a) I'm not a man therefore,
(b) I cannot partake in a non-existent patriarchy.
Q.E.D.
@634,439 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Isn't it just?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,446
@previous (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
You are, in actual fact, a man, and, therefore, a participant in the patriarchy.
You are, in actual fact, a man, and, therefore, a participant in the patriarchy.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,449
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Autphag logic proves otherwise:
@634,443 (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
Autphag logic proves otherwise:
@634,443 (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,456
@previous (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
Your logic is flawed, because your aurgument depends on you not being a man, when in actual fact, the contrary is true: you are, in every way, a man, and, in fact, you shall remain a man until the day you die. Thanks.
Your logic is flawed, because your aurgument depends on you not being a man, when in actual fact, the contrary is true: you are, in every way, a man, and, in fact, you shall remain a man until the day you die. Thanks.
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,459
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Your analysis is flawed, because your counter-argument depends on you having successfully refuted the idea that I'm not a man, when in actual fact, the contrary is true: I'm, in no way, a man, and, in fact, the only definition under which I could ever remain a man, having exhausted phenotypical presentation or options of reference to my political behaviours (seeing as a patriarchy does not exist), is through fictio legis, and I don't intend to die in this country anyway. Cheers.
Your analysis is flawed, because your counter-argument depends on you having successfully refuted the idea that I'm not a man, when in actual fact, the contrary is true: I'm, in no way, a man, and, in fact, the only definition under which I could ever remain a man, having exhausted phenotypical presentation or options of reference to my political behaviours (seeing as a patriarchy does not exist), is through fictio legis, and I don't intend to die in this country anyway. Cheers.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,462
@previous (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
You have a Y chromosome, testes, and a penis. You are a man.
You have a Y chromosome, testes, and a penis. You are a man.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,464
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,465
@634,462 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Karotypes are ornate at best, any phenotypology emanating thereforth being entirely dependent on contingencies beyond that; my testes don't produce testosterone anymore due to antiandrogens and my penis is thus effectively non-functioning.
I'm not, functionally, a man.
Karotypes are ornate at best, any phenotypology emanating thereforth being entirely dependent on contingencies beyond that; my testes don't produce testosterone anymore due to antiandrogens and my penis is thus effectively non-functioning.
I'm not, functionally, a man.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,467
Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,468
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I am, in fact, an existentially punished woman, demonically cursed by incongruential bodily placement.
I am, in fact, an existentially punished woman, demonically cursed by incongruential bodily placement.
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,469
@previous (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
> demonically cursed by incongruential bodily placement
It would be difficult to sound any more stupid. I think you've hit a wall.
> demonically cursed by incongruential bodily placement
It would be difficult to sound any more stupid. I think you've hit a wall.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,470
@previous (E)
Okay, empiricist retard. "Believe" (be-lie-Eve i.e. beholden to the lies of Eve) what you "see".
Okay, empiricist retard. "Believe" (be-lie-Eve i.e. beholden to the lies of Eve) what you "see".
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,471
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 43 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,472
@634,443 (Failed Dr. Matt !MLHqI35Srs)
Lol things don't not exist because you say they don't. you don't have to be a part of something to support it
Lol things don't not exist because you say they don't. you don't have to be a part of something to support it
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,473
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,476
@634,470 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Just when I thought you couldn't up your game any more... that's pretty good! Can you go even crazier?
Just when I thought you couldn't up your game any more... that's pretty good! Can you go even crazier?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,477
@634,462 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
you don't know Shit about other people's chromosomes boyee
Or yours prolly for that matter
you don't know Shit about other people's chromosomes boyee
Or yours prolly for that matter
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo double-posted this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,481
@634,473 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
thats just misogynistic false etymology why should I care? you are so dumb.
why don't you talk like people
do you use big fake words to confuse people into thinking that what you say means anything? because you know it doesn't like 90% of the time. you must. Do you realize what you do do you do it consciously?? do you ever feel like you're wrong?
thats just misogynistic false etymology why should I care? you are so dumb.
why don't you talk like people
do you use big fake words to confuse people into thinking that what you say means anything? because you know it doesn't like 90% of the time. you must. Do you realize what you do do you do it consciously?? do you ever feel like you're wrong?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,484
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Deconstructing meaning is a common tactic of the neurofeminine mental pathology. It's because they overprocess their environment to the point it's fake, having Mongoloid-esque performance-IQ intellectual profile bias; they think too fast, too vacuously, and consequently, too superficially. Hence everything they reason is in mere mimicry of male thought process.
Deconstructing meaning is a common tactic of the neurofeminine mental pathology. It's because they overprocess their environment to the point it's fake, having Mongoloid-esque performance-IQ intellectual profile bias; they think too fast, too vacuously, and consequently, too superficially. Hence everything they reason is in mere mimicry of male thought process.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,487
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
i give up you are too far gone it's like talking to a chatbot from 2005 you just revert to the same nonsense no matter what is presented to u. the saddest thing is when someone is so crazy that they think they aren't and that they are infallible. I wish u peace I guess but also hope that u die
i give up you are too far gone it's like talking to a chatbot from 2005 you just revert to the same nonsense no matter what is presented to u. the saddest thing is when someone is so crazy that they think they aren't and that they are infallible. I wish u peace I guess but also hope that u die
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,489
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)Please, fembot comrade, stop crying like these fellows of yours.