Topic: Dear chan elitists,

Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #48,570

It's probably a good idea for you to not mention or link to any other anonymous forums on CumBucket because of the advertising that's going to happen.
That is all.

(Edited 7 minutes later by a moderator.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #634,026

This seems to be an advertisement for your board.

(Edited 8 seconds later.)

r04r joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,027

Okay, guess I'll delete your links and ban you.

Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,028

@previous (r04r)
Nice, m8! Bloody twatted him one!

By the way, any idea what this is about? It is a rather brave choice to make a BBS with that particular name.

r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,031

@previous (B)
Not a clue.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,032

@634,027 (r04r)
That's not what I meant and you know it.
@634,026 (B)
No, it's a message to the sort of people that want to keep chans secret
@634,028 (B)
https://www.CumBucket.com/topic/51

(Edited 1 minute later by a moderator.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,033

Op got LLMed

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,034

I have always wondered when a site dedicated to buckets of cum would be created. Thanks for finally doing it @OP!

Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #634,036

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It is good you approve. As the OP implied, elitists have long looked down on this subject matter.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,044

Why are the links to AnonTalk being replaced with links to cumbucket.com?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,046

@previous (A)
Because your site sucks.

I can't have a discussion, not because of your pretenses to elitism, but because of your Anonymity fetish which, under the guise of desiring to remove the element of exhibitionism merely encourages a new sort of it by way of ideological collectivization.

Get fucking lost.

r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,054

@634,044 (A)
AnonTalk is anontalk.com. Your site is a blatant ripoff and is not AnonTalk. It doesn't help you don't want people posting links there.

(Edited 23 seconds later.)

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,055

@634,046 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Then leave.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,056

For the record: I am not myself someone who wants to keep certain anonymous forums secret, I am merely giving people who do a fair warning.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #634,058

@634,055 (G)
I'm not posting on it, you dumbfuck.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,097

@634,046 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> ideological collectivization
No, anonymity does not mean one has to agree with the 'consensus' nor does it mean that there is a consensus. All it means is that one is anonymous.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,098

@634,033 (D)
What does that mean?

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,104

@634,054 (r04r)
> you don't want people posting links there
see @634,056 (A)

Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,105

@634,027 (r04r)
Hmmm, double standard?
https://minichan.org/topic/48357

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 37 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,109

@previous (A)
Seems fair to me.

You were allowed one blatant advertisement. Anything beyond that is pushing it.

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

r04r replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #634,110

@634,105 (A)
It only came into effect just now.

@634,044 (A)
Anyway, they won't be anymore.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #635,492

@634,046 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
How do know that forced anonymity was added 'under the guise of desiring to remove the element of exhibitionism'?
Can you read Sysop's mind?
Ask him in https://www.anontalk.com/topic/51

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Minichan