Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago#48,509
The only difference between /lgbt/ and /pol/ is entirely superficial -- both endorse socialism under the veneer of their specific stances; /pol/ of the racial gatekeeping kind, and /lgbt/ of the "Harry Benjaminian purity" kind.
Meanwhile, /cow/ and /baph/, to discuss a differnt chan, only differ in their trolling policies of lolcows despite being ideologically as insipidly tabloid-esque as each other (nevertheless with one feigning better sophistication to the other out of a collective lack of self-awareness), and in the former case these standards aren't even applied consistently!
To cite an example, I wanted a contingental negroid thread; not trolling, observation would've done, as most of our /cow/s are indeed not actively trolled. I return after sleeping to find an abrasively written pseudointellectual wall of text justifying the subsequent decision to lock it: distilled, it was basically bitching about the criteria of eligible lolcows, which I'm sure was against the board's general ethos of refraining from Kiwifar.ms-esque lolcow classifications. (You may read that post here: http://8ch.net/cow/res/186516.html#q186557).
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#633,307
So you're mad because cow wouldn't PA Robert Mugabe for you
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#633,308
@previous (B)
Erm, some reading comprehension (why do I even say this when it's the case as ever?) would most certainly be in order, for you appear to have missed: @OP
> The only difference between /lgbt/ and /pol/ is entirely superficial -- both endorse socialism under the veneer of their specific stances; /pol/ of the racial gatekeeping kind, and /lgbt/ of the "Harry Benjaminian purity" kind. > > Meanwhile, /cow/ and /baph/, to discuss a differnt chan, only differ in their trolling policies of lolcows despite being ideologically as insipidly tabloid-esque as each other (nevertheless with one feigning better sophistication to the other out of a collective lack of self-awareness), and in the former case these standards aren't even applied consistently! > > To cite an example, I wanted a contingental negroid thread; not trolling, observation would've done, as most of our /cow/s are indeed not actively trolled. I return after sleeping to find an abrasively written pseudointellectual wall of text justifying the subsequent decision to lock it: distilled, it was basically bitching about the criteria of eligible lolcows, which I'm sure was against the board's general ethos of refraining from Kiwifar.ms-esque lolcow classifications. (You may read that post here: http://8ch.net/cow/res/186516.html#q186557). > > Collectivism, not once.
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#633,318
So you are mad because cow didn't want to talk about how funny Robert Mugabe is
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#633,320
@previous (B)
More like one user didn't, and the rest just questioned my motivations extraneous of this.
Don't speak of entire boards like you're intimate with their mindset.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#633,354