Topic: Can you bastards see this?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #48,503
Well? Can you?
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #633,214
I can
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,215
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,216
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,217
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,218
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,222
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,225
@previous (Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6)
If you post on bijou with your fedora tripcode, I will tell you why.
If you post on bijou with your fedora tripcode, I will tell you why.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,227
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
You're overcompensating again.
Revert to Bella now! For the sake of your mental health.
You're overcompensating again.
Revert to Bella now! For the sake of your mental health.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,228
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I'm sick of this site to be honest, I will shitpost it to the ground.
I'm sick of this site to be honest, I will shitpost it to the ground.
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #633,244
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #633,246
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #633,254
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #633,255
Green !BEERiVqJJw double-posted this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,289
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,293
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,295
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,296
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,298
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,299
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
Why do you say that? We are all flawed humans, but you have a good heart.
Why do you say that? We are all flawed humans, but you have a good heart.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,300
@633,295 (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
I know it seems hopeless to you. It probably is.
Allow me to cast some semi-rational light although probably not consistent with the emotional indulgences you wish to be pandered of right now.
You've nothing to gain from committing suicide; about as much, in fact, as you have to lose.
Modified forms of Pascal's wager make it clear that, when considering other theistic perspectives, there is less likely to be an afterlife to answer to in actuality.
If your family has disbandoned you and decided to declare you a write-off, then that's their loss, not yours. Try to think of them in less rosy terms. Was your relationship with them bilaterally abusive most often in recent times? If so, they were just a toxic influence in your life and it's best to sever them.
Same with anyone else who would cast disapproval on where you wish to go or want to do, whether currently or prospectively.
Be a little less inter-dependent, a little more alone, and a little more solid in the resolve of your loneliness. Try to look for the kind of evil in the world that'd give you the adverserial force to keep fighting.
Don't think in terms of 'woe is me', but rather, get that sense of moral panic back. Woe betides everyone, but persecution betides but those woeful enough to perpetrate it, and there's bound to be some in your life.
I know it seems hopeless to you. It probably is.
Allow me to cast some semi-rational light although probably not consistent with the emotional indulgences you wish to be pandered of right now.
You've nothing to gain from committing suicide; about as much, in fact, as you have to lose.
Modified forms of Pascal's wager make it clear that, when considering other theistic perspectives, there is less likely to be an afterlife to answer to in actuality.
If your family has disbandoned you and decided to declare you a write-off, then that's their loss, not yours. Try to think of them in less rosy terms. Was your relationship with them bilaterally abusive most often in recent times? If so, they were just a toxic influence in your life and it's best to sever them.
Same with anyone else who would cast disapproval on where you wish to go or want to do, whether currently or prospectively.
Be a little less inter-dependent, a little more alone, and a little more solid in the resolve of your loneliness. Try to look for the kind of evil in the world that'd give you the adverserial force to keep fighting.
Don't think in terms of 'woe is me', but rather, get that sense of moral panic back. Woe betides everyone, but persecution betides but those woeful enough to perpetrate it, and there's bound to be some in your life.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,302
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,369
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,389
@633,300 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> semi-rational
Stopped reading there. There is no "semi rational", you retard. You're either rational or not rational.
> semi-rational
Stopped reading there. There is no "semi rational", you retard. You're either rational or not rational.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,395
@previous (G)
Concrete thinking is actually the sign of retardation you're displaying which I'm not, ironically enough.
This lack of self-awareness is reflected in the fact you couldn't see why this insult says more about you than me.
Concrete thinking is actually the sign of retardation you're displaying which I'm not, ironically enough.
This lack of self-awareness is reflected in the fact you couldn't see why this insult says more about you than me.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 32 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,403
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
"Retard" is a clinical term. As a person suffering from autism, you meet all the clinical criteria necessary to be called a retard, you retard.
"Retard" is a clinical term. As a person suffering from autism, you meet all the clinical criteria necessary to be called a retard, you retard.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,405
@previous (G)
It's a distinct clinical category from autism, describing a state of deficient intelligence, which is actually not a necessity in the diagnostic criteria of autism, hence the existence of a high-functioning sub-set at all (even in the modified DSM-5 entry, where the equivalent label would now be 'mild').
However, you, being just a classic, neurotypical retard, have to disguise your idiocy in trolling guile. It's not working on me, pathetic African psychopath mind.
It's a distinct clinical category from autism, describing a state of deficient intelligence, which is actually not a necessity in the diagnostic criteria of autism, hence the existence of a high-functioning sub-set at all (even in the modified DSM-5 entry, where the equivalent label would now be 'mild').
However, you, being just a classic, neurotypical retard, have to disguise your idiocy in trolling guile. It's not working on me, pathetic African psychopath mind.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,416
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,417
@previous (G)
Your "fact" was duly refuted. It's you who has chimps on the mind.
We can back-inferrentially deduce that therefore you've a chimp mind.
Your "fact" was duly refuted. It's you who has chimps on the mind.
We can back-inferrentially deduce that therefore you've a chimp mind.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,418
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Facts are, in fact, irrefutable. That, as any schoolboy can tell you, is what makes them facts.
Facts are, in fact, irrefutable. That, as any schoolboy can tell you, is what makes them facts.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,420
@previous (G)
That's actually how Zulus translate or rather, simplify in lost context, their substitute meaning for the word 'fact' in their language, which was added post-colonialism anyway. It's not indigenous to their mental calculus.
As whites like me understand facts however, they merely involve finally conclusive detail, with no implications necessarily either at how they're arrived to, or at the status of their refutability, which would presumably be predicated on the process of their arrival, rather than presumed sacrosanct in themselves.
In other words, you've about the average African's understanding of this concept.
That's actually how Zulus translate or rather, simplify in lost context, their substitute meaning for the word 'fact' in their language, which was added post-colonialism anyway. It's not indigenous to their mental calculus.
As whites like me understand facts however, they merely involve finally conclusive detail, with no implications necessarily either at how they're arrived to, or at the status of their refutability, which would presumably be predicated on the process of their arrival, rather than presumed sacrosanct in themselves.
In other words, you've about the average African's understanding of this concept.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,463
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Kindly refrain from projecting your own celtonegroidalism onto me. Thanks.
Kindly refrain from projecting your own celtonegroidalism onto me. Thanks.