Topic: Trump DOMINATES tonight's debate..
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #48,487
you could argue...but you'd be wrong..
TRUMP in 2016
TRUMP in 2016
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 44 seconds later[^] [v] #633,096
all the other peons looked like peons..
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,104
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,108
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,111
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,115
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,117
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,119
We're pleased. The GOP is gifting us the election, thank you sooooo much!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,120
@633,117 (D)
just like the NAZIs did?
yes...believe me...I have indeed noticed this facist censorship..
just like the NAZIs did?
yes...believe me...I have indeed noticed this facist censorship..
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,127
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,130
@previous (A)
Seriously, not one of them stands a chance...think about it. What will Trump accomplish if elected? You think congress is going to go along? LOL, you poor dullard.
Seriously, not one of them stands a chance...think about it. What will Trump accomplish if elected? You think congress is going to go along? LOL, you poor dullard.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #633,132
@previous (E)
you are a dramatically retarded fool..
bet me right now...you pick a candidate and I will pick Trump..
if Trump wins you will suck my dick on video for all of mc to see and if the one you pick wins I will toss your fucking salad motherfucker..
let's do this...put your words to the test..
you are a dramatically retarded fool..
bet me right now...you pick a candidate and I will pick Trump..
if Trump wins you will suck my dick on video for all of mc to see and if the one you pick wins I will toss your fucking salad motherfucker..
let's do this...put your words to the test..
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #633,140
@previous (A)
Not going to answer my questions you sot? I have an 8 year old niece that could smash your pudding face whilst you cry like a little bitch.
Go home boy, sleep it off.
Not going to answer my questions you sot? I have an 8 year old niece that could smash your pudding face whilst you cry like a little bitch.
Go home boy, sleep it off.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #633,190
you can't stump the trump
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,520
Jimmy Carter did the same thing, blocking Iranians.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,526
@OP
You want him to DOMINATE your ass, you sissy faggot.
You want him to DOMINATE your ass, you sissy faggot.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,529
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,531
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,535
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,541
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,543
@previous (H)
> deflection
> motivational presumption
The latter's an invitation to reality, RSVP by, you know, not deluding yourself.
> deflection
> motivational presumption
The latter's an invitation to reality, RSVP by, you know, not deluding yourself.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,544
True Patriot wanted me to say that he supports Donald Trump and agrees with Sophie over on his forum.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,561
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,569
trump offers nothing to poor people
why do you support him
why do you support him
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,570
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,572
@633,569 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
That's because nothing offers anything to poor people.
Their circumstance is one of part-inevitability (on average lower inherited IQg), and part choice (they let motivational lassitude take over, especially in the presence of welfare state demotivators).
It's the poor that are then predated against under the pretense of compassion, one which is practised with frightening disdain! De-education initiatives ala Common Core, healthcare-CPS partnerships to track children, one involving a particularly disgusting case I heard of an autistic boy (of a Catholic mother who, far from abusing him, was merely being spited back at by her ex-husband lawyer and senate-gangster) being placed with perhaps the most pruriently turpitudinous homosexual couple (including but not limited to the repeated sodomious assault of the child) I'd ever been attested the existence to, and a whole litany of bureaucratic entrapment designed to reel in and reign upon their continued dependency.
It stinks of the fetid semen I imagine when getting vicarious post-traumatic flashbacks of that poor kid. The only way to avoid such a travesty would be Trumpism.
That's because nothing offers anything to poor people.
Their circumstance is one of part-inevitability (on average lower inherited IQg), and part choice (they let motivational lassitude take over, especially in the presence of welfare state demotivators).
It's the poor that are then predated against under the pretense of compassion, one which is practised with frightening disdain! De-education initiatives ala Common Core, healthcare-CPS partnerships to track children, one involving a particularly disgusting case I heard of an autistic boy (of a Catholic mother who, far from abusing him, was merely being spited back at by her ex-husband lawyer and senate-gangster) being placed with perhaps the most pruriently turpitudinous homosexual couple (including but not limited to the repeated sodomious assault of the child) I'd ever been attested the existence to, and a whole litany of bureaucratic entrapment designed to reel in and reign upon their continued dependency.
It stinks of the fetid semen I imagine when getting vicarious post-traumatic flashbacks of that poor kid. The only way to avoid such a travesty would be Trumpism.
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,586
@633,543 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
If you do not acknowledge that you are a retard, then you are delsional, for, in fact, it is a fact that you are a retard. Thanks.
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Retarded word salad.
If you do not acknowledge that you are a retard, then you are delsional, for, in fact, it is a fact that you are a retard. Thanks.
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Retarded word salad.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,589
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,592
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,593
@633,570 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
why do people support someone who clearly despises them?
@633,572 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
mm
i disagree
i don't really feel like getting into details but
why do people support someone who clearly despises them?
@633,572 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
mm
i disagree
i don't really feel like getting into details but
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,602
Trump: Because America's Gini coefficient needs to be even higher.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,606
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,607
@633,593 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
They might agree with his bigotry, or dislike anyone more left wing than Trump.
They might agree with his bigotry, or dislike anyone more left wing than Trump.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,627
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)> They might agree with his bigotry
Sure worked for Hitler
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,656
@633,569 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
if things get bad for even the rich folks...the less wealthy will be even worse off..
if things get bad for even the rich folks...the less wealthy will be even worse off..
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,660
@633,593 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
but EVERY one of the other candidates are damn near a hundred percent likely to NOT change anything that has been going on forever...and TRUMP will..
I like Hillary...but she will just focus on more entitlements...and Trump is going to make progress in shaking shit up..
but EVERY one of the other candidates are damn near a hundred percent likely to NOT change anything that has been going on forever...and TRUMP will..
I like Hillary...but she will just focus on more entitlements...and Trump is going to make progress in shaking shit up..
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,663
@633,606 (J)
You're not very bright if you choose to dismiss it as shtick as a means of eschewing dealing with the truth.
You're not very bright if you choose to dismiss it as shtick as a means of eschewing dealing with the truth.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,665
@633,660 (A)
Hitler changed a lot of things when he got into power. Trump will send 11 million people to death in Mexico and make Mexico pay for it.
Hitler changed a lot of things when he got into power. Trump will send 11 million people to death in Mexico and make Mexico pay for it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,667
@633,663 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
I will take 'how bout that word salad' for $1000..Alex..
I will take 'how bout that word salad' for $1000..Alex..
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,679
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,685
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
That doesn't work either. It just forms little micro-bureaucratic kleptocracies which syphon the wealth to be repropriated from the reported bourgeoisie elements, becoming in effect nuveaux-bourgeoisie ala le DPRK's high-songbun clans.
Sure, go ahead if that's your goal.
That doesn't work either. It just forms little micro-bureaucratic kleptocracies which syphon the wealth to be repropriated from the reported bourgeoisie elements, becoming in effect nuveaux-bourgeoisie ala le DPRK's high-songbun clans.
Sure, go ahead if that's your goal.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,687
@633,679 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
> redistribution of wealth should be the ultimate goal
Republicans are great at that- No group is more better at filling up their own wallets. Taking from poor to make the rich richer. They are even great tricksters by converting poor people into Republicans so the rich ones can get richer.
> redistribution of wealth should be the ultimate goal
Republicans are great at that- No group is more better at filling up their own wallets. Taking from poor to make the rich richer. They are even great tricksters by converting poor people into Republicans so the rich ones can get richer.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,705
@633,679 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
huh??!
wealth distrubution
so you or I should get part of someones money they piled up from successfully runing a huge business...while we put out not even a fraction of the effort nor made any of the sacrifices the business owner did?
please tell me you are joking..
huh??!
wealth distrubution
so you or I should get part of someones money they piled up from successfully runing a huge business...while we put out not even a fraction of the effort nor made any of the sacrifices the business owner did?
please tell me you are joking..
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,714
@633,627 (Syntax)
Trump looks like he's saying, "hoh, look at me, I Chinese, me Chinese, hoh, hoh
where the soy sauce"
Trump looks like he's saying, "hoh, look at me, I Chinese, me Chinese, hoh, hoh
where the soy sauce"
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,719
@633,705 (A)
lol
i'm saying eliminate (or severely reduce) corporate tax cuts (which are huuuuuge) and increase social services + the minimum wage to a living wage
in fact you were complaining about the very same thing, that the minimum wage was too low. and now you're saying you should be paid so little in order to fatten corporate wallets?
lol
i'm saying eliminate (or severely reduce) corporate tax cuts (which are huuuuuge) and increase social services + the minimum wage to a living wage
in fact you were complaining about the very same thing, that the minimum wage was too low. and now you're saying you should be paid so little in order to fatten corporate wallets?
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,725
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
See, this is the code I don't like.
You idiotically believe 'social services' to be inherently benevolent entities that aren't decompartmentalized and fragmented to fuck but nevertheless, for however disorganized they are, still able to exert a sort of viciousness parochical to themselves.
It's why I write so much against socialists of the matriarchal sort, as you seem to be in endorsement of.
See, this is the code I don't like.
You idiotically believe 'social services' to be inherently benevolent entities that aren't decompartmentalized and fragmented to fuck but nevertheless, for however disorganized they are, still able to exert a sort of viciousness parochical to themselves.
It's why I write so much against socialists of the matriarchal sort, as you seem to be in endorsement of.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,904
@633,719 (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
the next time you have a job...when you cash your first paycheck give a third of it away to someone who sits around the dorm watching tv all day..
the next time you have a job...when you cash your first paycheck give a third of it away to someone who sits around the dorm watching tv all day..
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,913
@previous (A)
i did
i think
i had a job this summer
taxes get taken from wages automatically i think
i did
i think
i had a job this summer
taxes get taken from wages automatically i think
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,916
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
but you had some money and there are people in your dorm who have NO money...shouldn't you redistribute some of your money to them also?
sure you had taxes took out...but as you said the current state of things just isn't working..
you want some people to give more to those who have none...what's wrong with you doing that? hmmmmmmmmm..
but you had some money and there are people in your dorm who have NO money...shouldn't you redistribute some of your money to them also?
sure you had taxes took out...but as you said the current state of things just isn't working..
you want some people to give more to those who have none...what's wrong with you doing that? hmmmmmmmmm..
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,920
@previous (A)
i don't have any money to give them dummy
if i had excessive resources the way the ceo of a fortune 500 company does then i could easily give away like half my paycheck and still be comfortable
i don't have any money to give them dummy
if i had excessive resources the way the ceo of a fortune 500 company does then i could easily give away like half my paycheck and still be comfortable
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,924
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
I know..
I agree with you actually..but I just don't think able bodied people who sit on their ass every day and already collect numerous benefits should be given anything more than a good whipping first thing when they wake up and again before they lay down at night..
people who work full time or who are in uni trying to better themselves should be helped by the redistribution though...absolutely..
I know..
I agree with you actually..but I just don't think able bodied people who sit on their ass every day and already collect numerous benefits should be given anything more than a good whipping first thing when they wake up and again before they lay down at night..
people who work full time or who are in uni trying to better themselves should be helped by the redistribution though...absolutely..
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,930
@previous (A)
there are loads of circumstances that can lead to poverty
edit:
weren't you homeless at some point
why would you be against helping homeless ppl by providing shelter/housing
there are loads of circumstances that can lead to poverty
edit:
weren't you homeless at some point
why would you be against helping homeless ppl by providing shelter/housing
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #633,931
@633,570 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)> That is not true.
>
> He offers them a generous amount of contempt.