Topic: I refuse to believe a syndrome called psychosis that a 'treatment' called 'anti-psychotics' 'fixes'
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #48,365
I'd forgotten (or rather deliberately pruned) the preposition 'in', because of space constrictions in the title.
The dopamine hypothesis is a misdirection. Aestherial phenomena aren't actually in the form of hallucinogenic experiences at all, rather that's the propaganda of psychiatrists deliberately misinterpreting the anecdotes of their patients as being descriptive of those things, or ascriptive of those ideas. Rather, though anti-psychotic coincidentally block dopaminergic receptors, its real action, as per the intentions of esoteric, secretive psychiatric theory, lies in its cholinergic action, or the disabling thereof.
Choline is the seat of logic and reason. Schizophrenics often have those faculties in overdrive much in the same way as autistics (hence they used to be considered related before Cohen's pseudointellectual bastardry came along to falsely dichotomize them in separation), however, it manifests itself differently due to superior meta-cognitive, meta-linguistic development, namely in the description of the metaphorical and the aphoristic, that are often misinterpreted 'delusions', but make absolutely perfect internal logical sense when interpreted correctly and with concentration.
Alas, psychiatrists are uninterested in any esoteric truth except for their own secretive mechanisms on how destructive medications are really meant to be utilized in the decreasing of intelligence, rather than the reported purpose of 'treatment' of 'disorders'. In fact, they want the culture of the public in the Anglosphere to be absolutely homogenized to its most basal, negroidic, and superficial levels, for the benefit of its entrapment inside infernal stagnation.
The dopamine hypothesis is a misdirection. Aestherial phenomena aren't actually in the form of hallucinogenic experiences at all, rather that's the propaganda of psychiatrists deliberately misinterpreting the anecdotes of their patients as being descriptive of those things, or ascriptive of those ideas. Rather, though anti-psychotic coincidentally block dopaminergic receptors, its real action, as per the intentions of esoteric, secretive psychiatric theory, lies in its cholinergic action, or the disabling thereof.
Choline is the seat of logic and reason. Schizophrenics often have those faculties in overdrive much in the same way as autistics (hence they used to be considered related before Cohen's pseudointellectual bastardry came along to falsely dichotomize them in separation), however, it manifests itself differently due to superior meta-cognitive, meta-linguistic development, namely in the description of the metaphorical and the aphoristic, that are often misinterpreted 'delusions', but make absolutely perfect internal logical sense when interpreted correctly and with concentration.
Alas, psychiatrists are uninterested in any esoteric truth except for their own secretive mechanisms on how destructive medications are really meant to be utilized in the decreasing of intelligence, rather than the reported purpose of 'treatment' of 'disorders'. In fact, they want the culture of the public in the Anglosphere to be absolutely homogenized to its most basal, negroidic, and superficial levels, for the benefit of its entrapment inside infernal stagnation.
Fedoraman !FeDoRAqAy6 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 43 seconds later[^] [v] #631,824
Medical science says otherwise. Why not give it a try of, say, one year at least? Modern psychiatric medication is really good, and a huge improvement from the past.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,862
> The dopamine hypothesis is a misdirection.
Umm... no it's backed up by a lot of work.
> Choline is the seat of logic and reason.
Choline is a neuromodulator all over the neural system. To assign one role to it is a little speculative and uninformed. Where in the nervous system are you even talking about? It's kind of like saying that water is the cause of dying. Sure... Life on earth needs water, but it can kill them if some of them if they get too much or too little. It's hardly the cause of death in most cases.
> Schizophrenics often have those faculties in overdrive much in the same way as autistics
Schizophrenics and people on the autism spectrum are pretty far apart. (That is why there are different sections for them in the DSM!) They manifest different symptoms. Some people claim UFOs are controlling their brains and other people like to watch spinning plates and go into meltdown about how they can't see facial expressions. It's pretty simple. Most schizophrenics (barring catatonic schizophrenics) aren't blind to other people's intentions and ideas. If anything, schizophrenics are thinking a lot about what other people are thinking when people on the autistic side of the spectrum aren't even capable of doing that.
> Alas, psychiatrists are uninterested in any esoteric truth except for their own secretive mechanisms
Nice. Paranoia. Well, have fun with that.
@OP
All I wanted was a Pepsi!
Umm... no it's backed up by a lot of work.
> Choline is the seat of logic and reason.
Choline is a neuromodulator all over the neural system. To assign one role to it is a little speculative and uninformed. Where in the nervous system are you even talking about? It's kind of like saying that water is the cause of dying. Sure... Life on earth needs water, but it can kill them if some of them if they get too much or too little. It's hardly the cause of death in most cases.
> Schizophrenics often have those faculties in overdrive much in the same way as autistics
Schizophrenics and people on the autism spectrum are pretty far apart. (That is why there are different sections for them in the DSM!) They manifest different symptoms. Some people claim UFOs are controlling their brains and other people like to watch spinning plates and go into meltdown about how they can't see facial expressions. It's pretty simple. Most schizophrenics (barring catatonic schizophrenics) aren't blind to other people's intentions and ideas. If anything, schizophrenics are thinking a lot about what other people are thinking when people on the autistic side of the spectrum aren't even capable of doing that.
> Alas, psychiatrists are uninterested in any esoteric truth except for their own secretive mechanisms
Nice. Paranoia. Well, have fun with that.
@OP
All I wanted was a Pepsi!
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,868
|βʒ| Meowth joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 22 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,869
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,870
@631,862 (C)
Yet I'm perfectly capable of doing that, and practically obsessed to the point of incapacitation by it.
Yet I'm perfectly capable of doing that, and practically obsessed to the point of incapacitation by it.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,874
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,877
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,890
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #631,899
@previous (C)
I would if you weren't so confident in your mutual exclusion of two disorders I've been diagnosed with.
So you don't deserve any reckoning as a formidable opponent.
I would if you weren't so confident in your mutual exclusion of two disorders I've been diagnosed with.
So you don't deserve any reckoning as a formidable opponent.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #631,906
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,913
@previous (C)
I will in my own company.
As for letting you have anything to rebut further? Lol no. I've learned as part of my strategy, that what I can keep discrete to later use in future arguments gives me a hindsight advantage.
I will in my own company.
As for letting you have anything to rebut further? Lol no. I've learned as part of my strategy, that what I can keep discrete to later use in future arguments gives me a hindsight advantage.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,917
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,918
@previous (C)
It's called my esoteric, secretive-evidence debate style.
As a Freemasonic public service agent, this should be familiar to you, whether you're a judge, juror, psychiatric or police stooge.
It's called my esoteric, secretive-evidence debate style.
As a Freemasonic public service agent, this should be familiar to you, whether you're a judge, juror, psychiatric or police stooge.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,920
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,923
@631,918 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> It's called my esoteric, secretive-evidence debate style.
Is that secret code for you just posting some words and assuming everyone should believe it's correct?
> It's called my esoteric, secretive-evidence debate style.
Is that secret code for you just posting some words and assuming everyone should believe it's correct?
|βʒ| Meowth replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,924
@previous (C)
> Is that secret code for you just posting some words and assuming everyone should believe it's correct?
This is like half of Minichan lol.
> Is that secret code for you just posting some words and assuming everyone should believe it's correct?
This is like half of Minichan lol.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,926
Looks like Sophie wins again!
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,928
@631,920 (D)
@631,923 (C)
The principle of secretive evidence is a staple of common law legal systems unbound constitutionally to standards of ethically fair trials; why, the idea is to actually do our culprit on, not give the fucker an unwarranted chance substantiated only by a technicality.
This is why the rules of debate should be changed to reflect this rightful prosecution of the unjust.
@631,923 (C)
The principle of secretive evidence is a staple of common law legal systems unbound constitutionally to standards of ethically fair trials; why, the idea is to actually do our culprit on, not give the fucker an unwarranted chance substantiated only by a technicality.
This is why the rules of debate should be changed to reflect this rightful prosecution of the unjust.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,936
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
So basically making assertions and hoping people don't examine them too closely. Cool. You rock.
So basically making assertions and hoping people don't examine them too closely. Cool. You rock.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,940
@previous (C)
Not even hoping, just disregarding whether they do, knowing the rule of logic (an "Aristotlean tyranny" in the customary Autphag lore) and corrupt franchise of empircism are inherently unjust enough to discard entirely in place of righteous esoteric Autphagist self-reliant thought.
Not even hoping, just disregarding whether they do, knowing the rule of logic (an "Aristotlean tyranny" in the customary Autphag lore) and corrupt franchise of empircism are inherently unjust enough to discard entirely in place of righteous esoteric Autphagist self-reliant thought.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,945
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #631,950
@631,940 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
hi every1 im new!!!!!!! holds up spork my name is katy but u can call me t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very random!!!! thats why i came here, 2 meet random ppl like me _… im 13 years old (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 watch invader zim w/ my girlfreind (im bi if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite tv show!!! bcuz its SOOOO random!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl =) like they say the more the merrier!!!! lol…neways i hope 2 make alot of freinds here so give me lots of commentses!!!!
DOOOOOMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein random again _^ hehe…toodles!!!!!
love and waffles,
t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m
hi every1 im new!!!!!!! holds up spork my name is katy but u can call me t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very random!!!! thats why i came here, 2 meet random ppl like me _… im 13 years old (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 watch invader zim w/ my girlfreind (im bi if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite tv show!!! bcuz its SOOOO random!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl =) like they say the more the merrier!!!! lol…neways i hope 2 make alot of freinds here so give me lots of commentses!!!!
DOOOOOMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <--- me bein random again _^ hehe…toodles!!!!!
love and waffles,
t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m