Minichan

Topic: Yes, I am a misogynist psychopath

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 10 years ago #48,332

But only as a reflection of the nature of the gynocrat herself.

Surely that was as simple as sin to figure out? But no, your beta-orbiting, matriarchy-cucked retardation compelled you to defend her as par with the course of vaginal-pedastal worship.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 53 seconds later[^] [v] #631,512

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,516

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,517

@previous (C)
What's edgy about calling a spade a spade, a lemon a lemon, and a whore a whore?

kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,518

What are you referring to?

Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,522

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)

I second this.

brie !K97EToNZCM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,523

Isn't literally everybody here a psychopath?

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 36 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,524

@previous (brie !K97EToNZCM)
I'm probably not

brie !K97EToNZCM replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,527

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Using punctuation and proper spelling is mark of a psychopath according to KATU news.

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,529

@previous (brie !K97EToNZCM)
I don't know what that is

squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,530

no. fucking. way.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,534

I got 18 out of 40 on the Hare PCL-R scales.

24 is the cut-off for psychopathy in Britain, 30 in America.

I've a "conscience with holes" and there's a lot of false positives in there that could apply to an Aspie non-maliciously and unintentionally committing the same follies.

My conclusion was that this was the confounding factor for the most part, but I make an exception around women where my actual psychopathic bloodlust will reveal itself.

brie !K97EToNZCM replied with this 10 years ago, 6 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,535

@631,529 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I must be a psychopath because the news is constantly implying as much.

(Edited 52 seconds later.)

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,540

@631,534 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
oh i passed that test with flying colors. it's obvious what they're looking for. are you a bad liar or did they just trick you into answering honestly?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 19 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,542

@631,535 (brie !K97EToNZCM)
I wish I had a link to the PCL-R to give to you...

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 47 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,544

@631,535 (brie !K97EToNZCM)
What?

brie !K97EToNZCM replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,547

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Hmm?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 7 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,548

@631,540 (squeegee)
The idea isn't to pass it, lol. Getting beneath the cut-off indicates clinical non-psychopathy (or sub-clinical psychopathy depending on whether your view is to trust the test or not).

I just managed, but you're probably right on the bad liar thing.

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,550

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
i would imagine the idea is to not be labeled as anything negative.

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,552

Sophie are you abusing drugs again?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 35 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,553

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
~*Amphetamines and ketamine are magic*~ :3

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,555

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
How does this relate to your current problems with Walter?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,556

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Because amphetamines and ketamine can at least love me properly ;_;

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,561

I :)
am >:(
not :D
bi-polar!! ;_;
I :S
am :/
not >.<
bipolar!!! xD

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,562

@631,556 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Which came first, the drugs or you two fighting?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 28 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,563

@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Us two before the drugs.

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,565

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
What did you start fighting about?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,566

@631,535 (brie !K97EToNZCM)
Well you have been locked up in a nut house a few times

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 12 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,567

@631,565 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Infidelity, and the fact he's incapable of truly sharing his affectations with me, because he's only stomaching who I am as an altruistic gesture, rather than any solely physical appreciation; consequent to this, he doesn't see me as being truly his second half.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,568

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

That makes you sad right?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,570

@631,567 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
> he doesn't see me as being truly his second half.
As if anyone could.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,571

@631,568 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
How else should it make me feel?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,572

@631,570 (I)
Hefford, tinychan's that way
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,577

@631,567 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Cheating on you with who?

Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,579

@631,571 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

I'm not going to pretend that I fully understand the problem and I will sound like a asshole.

But sometimes you simply have to create your own excuses and beliefs inorder to preserve yourself.


Sadness is something I have rarely felt. Like when I was saying goodbye to my dog who had been with me since i was 7.

I took her to the vet to die and then I left before she had died.

I don't regret it or feel sad because if it was me who was dying, I would have wanted my pet not to witness it.

I guess I am saying, imagine your way out, you have every reason and justification for that. Simply believe in yourself.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #631,581

@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
That was endearing. Thank you.
@631,577 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Rather not say.

Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #631,597

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

No problem. Just give it a try sometime.

(Edited 18 seconds later.)

kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #631,608

@631,581 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
You're not talking about his "first wife" though, right?

squeegee replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #631,609

walter is fucking sophie? oh, it all makes sense now. when did this start?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.