Minichan

New Sophie/Autphag philosophical essay: Neurism, a specifically matriarchal conspiratorial apparatus

If we’re to recognize that we can, and must, analyze conflict on demographic and sociologically analyzable categorical entities of other natures; race, sex, etc., then we must recognize additionally that these are not the only dimensions on which such a conflictual analysis can, and must, be made.

In the early 20th century, a theory was devised by one Dr. Bean, a coroner, post-mortem forensic analyst, and apparently an early pioneer in the field of neuroscience, as well as general physician, from Pennsylvania, that reminiscently smacks of the half-cocked surmising by one diminutive Jew from the halls of a certain University faculty down in the South East of England. Negroids had a certain “neurological peculiarity”, the discovery of which would be bound to set on an adrift course the perception of the viability with which the resultant characteristics coming forthwith would be seen hereforth, in the same way the Asperger has all but been written off a human liability. A diminished corpus callosum was to be determined the sum of all constituent parts, overlooking the fact of course that this was indeed not yet-verified a seat of cognitive dexterity or latency. It has been generally regarded since these times, on many neuroscience and human bio-diversity blogs, that such summations of the aggregate of a sub-group’s nature are categorically racist in their form — though I take contention with the term’s validity (it being a neologism coined by Trotsky in his seminal essay, darest one be able even to call it that in caliber, on what he erroneously referred to as a “dictatorship” the democratically elected National Socialist government, and further still incorrectly presumed of Hitler his intellectual mediocrity, only since the latter preferred historical inspection and examination rooted in verifiable tradition and chronological concretion rather than deconstructive rubrics of an insipidly post-modernist abstrusion, as was Leon’s preference), it being the logical crux of my argument in reprimanding leftist philosophical inconsistency, it cannot be discounted.

If we are to carry this on consistently from the premise of racial chauvinism such a claim on a group as the Black man, then shouldn’t we, though conspicuously haven’t been able to, take this same “rigour” in the inadvertent tarnishing of gross inferiority such a group as the Asperger, that has been consigned a status of disability and thus, defectiveness, on little more than a similar standard of observational flippancy? In other words, why is there no analogous equivalent to “racism”, as, say, most appropriately put, “neurism”, to date having been broached even by those so reportedly committed to the cause of autistic emancipation as the self-anointed neuro-diversitard?

In the final analysis of neurodiversity’s composition, I had broached that a certain force, of an origin rooted in the evolution of Marxist conflictual analysis to that of the gender-conflictualists, was solely responsible for pre-emptive infiltration within its quarters, in a way that would have TERFs scream were it to happen to their safe-spaces were it perpetrated by the gaudy transvestites of the Guardian’s Editorial room, of their own specifically assigned agents, possessing self-interested motivations specific to themselves, armed with Saulinsky-esque radicalist rambunctiousness, and S.C.U.M.-inspired misandric rancour. They came with genuine disinterest in their demographic beyond that they could co-opt from a malicious, somatoform-conversion disorder fueled malignering in pursuit of the diagnosis’ impartment of a credibility peculiar to their political intentions, rather than its genuine appreciation in the role of any medical descriptiveness to a disorder which they had not possessed, but had rather merely feigned, as any otherwise highly socially adroit feminist leftist would.

So neurodiversity’s inner-circle, entirely comprised of three women (one of them, AFF’s co-founder, speculated a transsexual, which, considering “her” nation of origin only has two explanations: 1. “she” was trying to escape the B’nai B’ritish regime’s proscriptive moratorium on autistic gender-transitions, which I’d honestly find too innocent an ascription, or 2. this bitch is not autistic at all, had merely retroactively tried to convince a doctor that “she” has always had it, for the sorts of purposes general to her occupation in professional political subversion outlined above, infinitely higher in likelihood as a reason), has managed to capitalize in a unique status as political arbiters in an equally original corruption, when no sociological reference in an autistic community should exist to the left specific to itself, given an autist’s nature is not inherently collectivist, nor should a feminine oligarchical elite exist within the community, given the preponderance of men holding the condition’s title-sake; a state-sanctioned dismantling of barriers and destruction of group-cohesive homogeneity, for the sake of upholding a new “privilege by intersectionalism”, or the degree of one’s persecution by association to disparate groups (such that the “autistic female” is understandably a corruption in consistency), had been given conception.

Autism is, as we’ve established already, a specifically matriarchal problem, with its political subversion and continued upholding as a socially down-stratifying categorization, originating from, and a boon to, feminist forebears. Creating a polarization between an exoteric under-contingent disenfranchised by this oppressive subjugation primarily preponderated by the original male ascribees of the label, and this new esoterically-assisted dominating battalion of usurpers, by the nebulous forces of matriarchal leftism, makes this flavor of Cohenist neurism, as I’ve come to term it, a necessitated evil, as perceived by the very same, to perpetuate.

Without neurism, as rooted in the ascriptive lore in a psychiatry permeated by Cohenitic doctrinarianism, so the divinity of feminine essence’s matriarchal usurpation would not have a justificational precis upon which to predicate the necessitation of their supremacy. Neurism is the seed from which the fruits of domination over the autistic subjugant must be reaped to furnish nourishingly the narrative of the gynocentric persecution fetish; without which, a scapegoat misascribed faux-virlized hyper-masculinity could not exist to perpetuate its existence.