Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#630,264
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 21 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#630,443
@630,261 (A)
Is this some sort of old porn thing that happened in the 90's? It's like something shared at 1440 baud, idk people would fap to this sort of thing
|βʒ| Meowth joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#630,466
> Is this some sort of old porn thing that happened in the 90's? It's like something shared at 1440 baud, idk people would fap to this sort of thing
It may have started in the 90s, but I've only seen it starting in the early 2000s. Since 2010, I have seen this to be quite a common thing which I also don't understand.
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#630,474
@previous (|βʒ| Meowth)
I think it may have started in part to give context to images to make them more exciting, particularly to put the subject or viewer in fetish-related scenarios. For example, a picture of a naked girl is just a naked girl. But a naked girl with the caption "pleas put down the plunger, big brother" is an erotic incest fantasy.
Personally I dislike caption porn though
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#630,475
creepy!!
|βʒ| Meowth replied with this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#630,476
Actually, I only used to see it on incest porn pictures mainly. Like hey big brother, and other shit like that. I think you're right. Probably some person with crossed fetishes introduced it to the other fetish communities.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#630,514
write in: bubble filters
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#631,053
@previous (F)
Is that even porn? Implied porn maybe
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#631,057
captions are terrible
porn is generally awful to begin with but captions make it even worse
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#631,058
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
Just did a search of Sarah Palin caption porn. Shit is so awful. None I found is worth posting.
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#631,061
Now, the world don't move to the beat of just one drum,
What might be right for you, may not be right for some.
A man is born, he's a man of means.
Then along come two, they got nothing but their dreams.
But they got, Diff'rent Strokes.
It takes Diff'rent Strokes.
It takes Diff'rent Strokes to move the world.
Everybody's got a special kind of story;
Everybody finds a way to shine.
It don't matter that you got not alot.
So what?
They'll have theirs, you'll have yours, and I'll have mine.
And together we'll be fine!
'Cuz it takes Diff'rent Strokes to move the world,
Yes it does.
It takes Diff'rent Strokes to move the world.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Triptych !!/xkPL9myM replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#631,106
@previous (A)
that doesn't apply to porn preferences
thanks
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#631,109
@previous (Triptych !!/xkPL9myM)
it applies to everything..
I am just being realistic...not trying to be an ass..