Topic: PETA workers took a man's dog off his property and killed it that same day.
Sheila LaBoof started this discussion 11 years ago #47,946
PETA admits they took the wrong dog and gave him a fruit basket to apologize.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 43 minutes later[^] [v] #627,375
fuck. peta. they'd rather kill million upon millions of pets because they think pet ownership is animal slavery. fucking evil cunts. they are not about the welfare of animals as they like people to think, they are about ending human use of animals in all forms, by any means, including deceit, violence and killing. if you love your pets then don't support peta in any way. if they can get their hands on your pet it will be dead by the end of the day of not sooner.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,379
@previous (squeegee)
isn't that like condemning all doctors and nurses in the medical field because part of their work includes abortions?
isn't that like condemning all doctors and nurses in the medical field because part of their work includes abortions?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,382
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,384
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,387
@627,379 (C)
no, because it's the policy of peta as an organization to euthanize. like the dude who's dog they took. to euthanize the same day. it's policy, and it's a terribly misguided, selfish and evil policy. the people working for peta are despicable as well because they work to further an awful agenda. peta does not run no kill clinics, it's the exact opposite, they run death camps for pets and have a gestapo running around kidnapping pets off the streets and out of people's yards.
no, because it's the policy of peta as an organization to euthanize. like the dude who's dog they took. to euthanize the same day. it's policy, and it's a terribly misguided, selfish and evil policy. the people working for peta are despicable as well because they work to further an awful agenda. peta does not run no kill clinics, it's the exact opposite, they run death camps for pets and have a gestapo running around kidnapping pets off the streets and out of people's yards.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,389
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,390
@previous (E)
because they legally operate animal clinics and have licenses to euthanize and do so with wild abandon. people will have a pet they can't care for and leave it with peta thinking it'll get adopted (because they're told it will be) and then it's euthanized like all the rest. i've read they also round up strays. i'm not exactly sure how peta operates, but i know that they're being scrutinized more and more every year.
because they legally operate animal clinics and have licenses to euthanize and do so with wild abandon. people will have a pet they can't care for and leave it with peta thinking it'll get adopted (because they're told it will be) and then it's euthanized like all the rest. i've read they also round up strays. i'm not exactly sure how peta operates, but i know that they're being scrutinized more and more every year.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,392
@627,387 (squeegee)
haven't they done a ton of work to dissuade companies from using animals in tests for products...where the tests were detrimental to the welfare of the animals?
also have they not work for several years to change peoples opinion on supporting the Fur for fashion industry?
irresponsible pet owners and people who ignore the ever growing problem of over breeding of cats and dog etc are a considerable contributing factor when it comes to euthanizing animals
no kill shelters sound warm and fuzzy and wonderful but the simple fact of the matter is the overwhelming amount of uncared for animals is too big a problem at the moment and drastic measure are sometimes called for to deal with serious issues
have you done anything to help the issues PETA has worked hard to address over the years? or do you just sit back and whine like a little bitch...saying THEY don't do enough...and ''THEY;; should do things better?
grow the fuck up and start a goddamn no kill shelter you whiney fuck...or stfu and quit being a lil drama queen
haven't they done a ton of work to dissuade companies from using animals in tests for products...where the tests were detrimental to the welfare of the animals?
also have they not work for several years to change peoples opinion on supporting the Fur for fashion industry?
irresponsible pet owners and people who ignore the ever growing problem of over breeding of cats and dog etc are a considerable contributing factor when it comes to euthanizing animals
no kill shelters sound warm and fuzzy and wonderful but the simple fact of the matter is the overwhelming amount of uncared for animals is too big a problem at the moment and drastic measure are sometimes called for to deal with serious issues
have you done anything to help the issues PETA has worked hard to address over the years? or do you just sit back and whine like a little bitch...saying THEY don't do enough...and ''THEY;; should do things better?
grow the fuck up and start a goddamn no kill shelter you whiney fuck...or stfu and quit being a lil drama queen
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #627,395
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,397
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,398
@previous (D)
Wouldn't tumblr despise PETA for murdering animals?
Though, thinking about it, I can see how the crazier SJWs might approve.
@627,390 (squeegee)
Good to hear, lad. I am glad they are being questioned.
Wouldn't tumblr despise PETA for murdering animals?
Though, thinking about it, I can see how the crazier SJWs might approve.
@627,390 (squeegee)
Good to hear, lad. I am glad they are being questioned.
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,406
@627,392 (C)i'm saying peta is a deceitful, irresponsible and reckless organization run by psychopaths and you're mad as fuck young lady.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,407
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,456
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,464
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,494
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,504
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Why isn't it though? They (peta)do positive things for animal welfare, do they not? Yet part of their program causes even somewhat open minded individuals to scream in disgust because those who they (peta)have sworn to serve and protect die at their hands.
Do you not see the correlation?
Why isn't it though? They (peta)do positive things for animal welfare, do they not? Yet part of their program causes even somewhat open minded individuals to scream in disgust because those who they (peta)have sworn to serve and protect die at their hands.
Do you not see the correlation?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,507
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,510
@previous (K)
And that type of shit is why I am not a big peta fan. But they do a lot of good along with the stupid stuff..
And that type of shit is why I am not a big peta fan. But they do a lot of good along with the stupid stuff..
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous F double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,511
They do bad but they also do good.
It's like the old saying-
you cannot make an omelot without breaking a few eggs
It's like the old saying-
you cannot make an omelot without breaking a few eggs
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,515
@previous (F)
they aren't trying to make an omelot. they are trying to kill all chickens so people can't use them as food at all. better to kill them than use them.
they aren't trying to make an omelot. they are trying to kill all chickens so people can't use them as food at all. better to kill them than use them.
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 43 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,520
Anonymous F double-posted this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,521
@627,515 (squeegee)
How can you be so misguided in your thinking?
Did some woman who was associated with or a fan of peta tell everyone you know that your penis was tiny, or something.
Anyone past third grade knows peta's mission is not to destroys all animals, but to protect them.
Sure, not everyone in any organization is perfect and always makes the best policy decisions...but you act like peta has some kind of agenda to eradicate all animals from the earth. How gay is your line of thinking? gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay..
How can you be so misguided in your thinking?
Did some woman who was associated with or a fan of peta tell everyone you know that your penis was tiny, or something.
Anyone past third grade knows peta's mission is not to destroys all animals, but to protect them.
Sure, not everyone in any organization is perfect and always makes the best policy decisions...but you act like peta has some kind of agenda to eradicate all animals from the earth. How gay is your line of thinking? gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay..
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,527
@627,520 (F)
Let me rephrase what squeegee is saying.
It is like when you go to fight Senator Armstrong. At first, he is simply saying that he wants to start a war to help the USA's economy. But after you fight him, he reveals that his true goal is to turn the USA in into a brutal anarchy, which is far worse. PETA is like that. That's what squeegee is getting at.
Let me rephrase what squeegee is saying.
It is like when you go to fight Senator Armstrong. At first, he is simply saying that he wants to start a war to help the USA's economy. But after you fight him, he reveals that his true goal is to turn the USA in into a brutal anarchy, which is far worse. PETA is like that. That's what squeegee is getting at.
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,532
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 42 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,533
So PETA is against fur, but not leather? How does that work
Anonymous D double-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,534
@627,532 (F)
PETA must be a herd of grazing vegans, wearing only natural fibers, living in huts of mud.
PETA must be a herd of grazing vegans, wearing only natural fibers, living in huts of mud.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,535
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,537
@627,533 (D)
We eats tons of animals, we have to kill the animals to eat them. Eating animals keeps our bodies alive and functioning. A byproduct of the animal carcasses we utilize for nutrition is leather, it happens to be great for jackets and gloves so we use that instead of being dumb and just throwing it away.
The Fur as clothing industry is primarily based on killing animals for fashionable garments...and is all about animals suffering only so that the proprietors of the fur business can gain wealth.
Anyone who cannot see the difference in that is retarded.
We eats tons of animals, we have to kill the animals to eat them. Eating animals keeps our bodies alive and functioning. A byproduct of the animal carcasses we utilize for nutrition is leather, it happens to be great for jackets and gloves so we use that instead of being dumb and just throwing it away.
The Fur as clothing industry is primarily based on killing animals for fashionable garments...and is all about animals suffering only so that the proprietors of the fur business can gain wealth.
Anyone who cannot see the difference in that is retarded.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 28 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,542
Anonymous K replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,545
http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/petakillspets.asp
While PETA's stance on euthanasia is controversial, we could find little evidence it has been extended to family pets with any frequency. PETA workers were arrested over pet theft incidents in 2007 and 2014, but the intent of the workers in those cases was not sufficiently clear to consider their actions unlawful. Aside from those two incidents, we've found no evidence supporting the claim that PETA regularly takes household pets from their homes and euthanizes them. PETA has not responded to a request for comment.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,549
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,551
@627,545 (K)
most likely...and this is what some fools apparently are not getting...is that they take animal from jackasses who are neglecting them..
now as to whether or not the animals being euthanized after being rescued is a lovely thing? maybe not...but was letting them remain for an indefinite period of time under the miscare and neglect of the so-called owners the better choice?
do you people really use your brains before you post?
most likely...and this is what some fools apparently are not getting...is that they take animal from jackasses who are neglecting them..
now as to whether or not the animals being euthanized after being rescued is a lovely thing? maybe not...but was letting them remain for an indefinite period of time under the miscare and neglect of the so-called owners the better choice?
do you people really use your brains before you post?
Anonymous N double-posted this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,552
anyway...fyi...imo..
anyone who ties a dog up to a five foot tether..or in a cage not big enough for an automobile...and leaves it there every day for years...is a no count dirty low down fucktard who should be beat with a baseball bat..
anyone who ties a dog up to a five foot tether..or in a cage not big enough for an automobile...and leaves it there every day for years...is a no count dirty low down fucktard who should be beat with a baseball bat..
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous N triple-posted this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,565
winning
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,569
@627,552 (N)
You know nothing about working dogs or hunting dogs, and just have a childlike view of the world
You know nothing about working dogs or hunting dogs, and just have a childlike view of the world
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 38 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,572
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,574
@627,504 (F)
@627,515 (squeegee)
Reminds me of the US policy of wiping out an entire village so that it won't fall into the hands of the Viet-kong during the 1960s.
@627,515 (squeegee)
Reminds me of the US policy of wiping out an entire village so that it won't fall into the hands of the Viet-kong during the 1960s.
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #627,582
To end suffering, all life must be extinguished, everywhere.