Topic: Is it safe to assume that Minichan is now the official Autphag containment board?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #47,405
Is it?
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes. | 3 | 25% | |
| No. | 3 | 25% | |
| Not sure. | 6 | 50% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #621,769
I wonder if his penis is severed yet
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,770
He ain't smart enough to figure out how easy it is to get himself castrated.
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,771
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,774
@previous (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
You're the one that wants to be castrated.
I was born with the most proper genes. My package works terrific.
You're the one that wants to be castrated.
I was born with the most proper genes. My package works terrific.
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,776
@previous (C)
Then you admit to being an experience-bereft chan-tard autist opining beyond one's station?
Whatever can be said about P-Logic, he knew how to call out a bullshitter.
Then you admit to being an experience-bereft chan-tard autist opining beyond one's station?
Whatever can be said about P-Logic, he knew how to call out a bullshitter.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,779
@previous (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
If I had that image Syntax uses to prove you're not smart enough to read a simple label.
You should sue any remaining family for passing on totally defective genes to you.
If I had that image Syntax uses to prove you're not smart enough to read a simple label.
You should sue any remaining family for passing on totally defective genes to you.
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 55 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,781
@previous (C)
Except instructions to commit suicide aren't on the label.
That's Alzheimer's logic and you were dumb enough to believe it.
Except instructions to commit suicide aren't on the label.
That's Alzheimer's logic and you were dumb enough to believe it.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,785
@previous (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
> Except instructions to commit suicide aren't on the label.
So you admit to being dumb as fuck. Unable to use Bing or Google search, to locate the information.
> Except instructions to commit suicide aren't on the label.
So you admit to being dumb as fuck. Unable to use Bing or Google search, to locate the information.
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 33 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,786
@previous (C)
I used my intuition. Search engines are for autistic rote-automatons, arguably the most negroidally concrete and lowest-intelligence race on the planet, unlike the Aspergian magician.
I used my intuition. Search engines are for autistic rote-automatons, arguably the most negroidally concrete and lowest-intelligence race on the planet, unlike the Aspergian magician.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,804
@previous (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
> I used my intuition
100% Proof your intuition is half-witted, feeble-minded, mentally defective and lamebrained.
You do use search engines which proves you're a spastic rote-automaton, arguably the lowest intelligent person on minichan.
Proof only because you were not smart enough to use it properly.
> I used my intuition
100% Proof your intuition is half-witted, feeble-minded, mentally defective and lamebrained.
You do use search engines which proves you're a spastic rote-automaton, arguably the lowest intelligent person on minichan.
Proof only because you were not smart enough to use it properly.
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,809
Green joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,812
Scrabble is the official containment board.
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,815
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,826
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,829
@previous (C)
Who else capitalizes proof after 100%? Or use the wrong grammatical case of the word 'intelligence' after the wrong comparative/superlative pair? That's solidly Syntaxian territory.
Who else capitalizes proof after 100%? Or use the wrong grammatical case of the word 'intelligence' after the wrong comparative/superlative pair? That's solidly Syntaxian territory.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,834
@previous (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
Perhaps contaminated by "Syntaxian" English.
You should know better. Syntaxian is not a legitimate English word.
You as well, have been contaminated by Syntax. (Pun intended)
Perhaps contaminated by "Syntaxian" English.
You should know better. Syntaxian is not a legitimate English word.
You as well, have been contaminated by Syntax. (Pun intended)
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,835
@previous (C)
You can make an adjective with anyone's name, really, to describe the properties of something external to that.
Otherwise words like 'Thatcherite' wouldn't be anything more than neologisms.
Saying prescriptive use is a function of popularity fallaciously appeals to common authority.
You can make an adjective with anyone's name, really, to describe the properties of something external to that.
Otherwise words like 'Thatcherite' wouldn't be anything more than neologisms.
Saying prescriptive use is a function of popularity fallaciously appeals to common authority.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,839
@previous (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
First we have Syntax, playing Shakespeare, who famously made up new words.
Are you also trying to be a Syntax clone?
First we have Syntax, playing Shakespeare, who famously made up new words.
Are you also trying to be a Syntax clone?
Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,842
@previous (F)
I make sensible neologisms based on established rules of language.
Syntax makes discordant gibberish into words by force, and of course it's illfitting.
I hope you're not seriously oblivious enough not to see these subtleties.
I make sensible neologisms based on established rules of language.
Syntax makes discordant gibberish into words by force, and of course it's illfitting.
I hope you're not seriously oblivious enough not to see these subtleties.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,844
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,846
@621,842 (Soupie !FaiGWhdD4g)
> subtleties
Perhaps removing your discordant gonads, will fix what ails you.
> illfitting?
> sensible neologisms based on established rules of language.
Fail removing the space does not follow established rules of language.
> subtleties
Perhaps removing your discordant gonads, will fix what ails you.
> illfitting?
> sensible neologisms based on established rules of language.
Fail removing the space does not follow established rules of language.