Topic: You can't objectively prove anything.
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #47,279
Prove me wrong.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 57 seconds later[^] [v] #621,133
Of course you can. Look, I just did!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #621,134
@previous (B)
No, you didn't.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,135
@previous (A)
Yeah I did, I just proved it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 36 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,136
@previous (B)
You proved nothing, and if you did, it certainly isn't objective proof.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,137
@previous (A)
Prove it isn't objective proof
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 54 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,138
@previous (B)
You can't prove a negative, and even if you could, it wouldn't be objective.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,141
@previous (A)
So you just don't believe what you read?
Canti joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,144
i can
objectively prove i fuked OPs mum last nite
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,145
@previous (Canti)
Everyone can prove that. OP is mad at objectivity though
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,146
@621,144 (Canti)
But is it objective proof?
Canti replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,148
@previous (D)
niggers tongued my anus
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,149
@previous (Canti)
Do you have objective proof of that?
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,151
@previous (D)
It's already been objectively proven
Canti replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,153
@621,149 (D)
yes, an objectively clean but slightly objectively moist anus
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,157
@previous (Canti)
How is that objective?
Canti replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,160
@previous (D)
how is it not objective?
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,162
@previous (Canti)
It isn't.
Canti replied with this 11 years ago, 36 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #621,163
@previous (D)
can you objectively prove it isnt?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,181
@OP
I'll prove my fist in your face.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,184
Maths and things.
Canti replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #621,186
@621,181 (E)
but is it objective?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #621,199
@previous (Canti)
How is it not objective?
|βʒ| Meowth joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #621,239
Hey I got an idea, how about you fucks shut the hell up?
kook !g394spAKvY replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #621,276
The trannies should learn this.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 25 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #621,280
@621,184 (F)
axioms and stuff
kook !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #621,332
@621,276 (kook !g394spAKvY)
they already know
↕