Topic: I have a strange question about child porn.
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago#4,723
Someone posted a link that I suspect might be child porn. I want to report it but am scared to look at the video, so I'm not completely sure if it's anything illegal. What should I do?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later[^][v]#83,785
Seriously guys, what should I do?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#83,786
Mind your own business instead of being a hero; being a hero gets people killed, in case you have forgotten.
Alternatively, send it to the police without opening... you're paying taxes for a reason, right?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#83,787
> Someone posted a link that I suspect might be child porn. I want to report it but am scared to look at the video, so I'm not completely sure if it's anything illegal. What should I do?
Just how bad can advice be??????????? Be careful when you ask an intelligent question and get replies from Idiots.
If you were to go to the FBI Web site or DOJ web site (Dept of Justice) You will find the link to report CP - It is NOT a Fed run operation yet is sponsored by them AND YOUR REPORT DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION FROM YOU.
So to save you the trouble and please notice that there are spaces to add personal information but it is NOT REQUIRED.
To report an incident involving the possession, distribution, receipt, or production of child pornography, go to the website operated by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). Your report will be forwarded to a law enforcement agency for investigation and action."
NCMEC is a Hot Link that takes you too the link I gave you.
When you look at the form please quick scan top to bottom - Notice towards the bottom a section you can fill out with text and explain that you are not sure nor have looked but suspect!!!
1:This is why you HAVE to report - Of course the Moral issue. Children are kidnapped or even forced by parents to make porn for income. Children are killed.
2: Legally you have downloaded content whether you have viewed the video or not. ISP/SP has you logged and your computer has multiple tracks of content that may be illegal. By reporting the content you end up feeling better as well as being on safe grounds with law.
3: I have several letters of thank you's from law enforcement agencies, including the FBI which was a surprise. When one calls them on the phone one gets a nasty impression and I have to work with these guys for my work.
So do the right thing. Its a no brainier and you have nada to lose because you do NOT HAVE TO SUPPLY PERSONAL INFORMATION!!
AND NEXT TIME Expect bad advice here along with MAYBE some more better advice.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#85,308
> 1: This is why you HAVE to report - Of course the Moral issue. Children are kidnapped or even forced by parents to make porn for income. Children are killed.
Reporting child porn will not stop the production of CP (and may actually encourage it). It is very unlikely that it will lead to kidnapped children being found. Children are killed because Child Pornography is illegal. If it were not illegal children would not be killed.
> 2: Legally you have downloaded content whether you have viewed the video or not. ISP/SP has you logged and your computer has multiple tracks of content that may be illegal. By reporting the content you end up feeling better as well as being on safe grounds with law.
OP did not view the link. OP has not downloaded any content.
> 3: I have several letters of thank you's from law enforcement agencies, including the FBI which was a surprise. When one calls them on the phone one gets a nasty impression and I have to work with these guys for my work.
I thought the FBI had important work to do, like stopping violent crime and terrorist attacks...
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,693
@previous (D)
Typical arguments from those Pro Pedophilia.
Kidnapped children have been found and rescued - Challenge me to hit Google and dig up many examples.
Legal vs Illegal. Lets take Legal for a moment. It was 100% Legal for Hitler to kill millions of innocent people, under German constitutional law. The same could be said of other Power Hungry idiots in other countries.
What is Morally right is the most proper way to do what is right. You support making it legal to rape a 8 year old child just because you think that if it were legal fewer children would be killed. Please consider that a life after such an event may be worse then actual DEATH.
When you were 7 looking back now - Would you have been pleased being sodomized by a dozen men in a place where the laws could care less?
OP cannot click on URL and view a page no matter what it may show, without
>Downloading it<
OP viewed enough to know there may have been content that was illegal. Good for OP for not going further. I have about two times and immediately reported it, almost faster then the speed of light. Maybe 3 times? Nor did I go past any more content to see if any more on that URL was illegal - One quick disgusting view and results of Server going off and arrests and Prison tyme well it feels good yes yes.
You thought? When did you start thinking?? YOU Will end up in jail ganged raped, and I bet you will be thinking how did I get there. Consider Sewercide please.
Stopping CP Child Abductions across state lines - Is FBI charter and as for Terrorist attacks???? The Terror is already a daily occurrence right in your own Hood rite now, by fucked up wackos who cook Meth and all sorts of shit inbreed people do and Terror is what CP is all about.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,696
vocalon !0oDERPONYY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,723
@85,716 (Syntax)
Syntax Decoded (sounds like a sequel to that newish movie)
Basically, file an anonymous tip here: https://tips.fbi.gov/
Try to include as much detail as possible, like the site name, IP address, run a WHOIS on it, and send them that.
Then you may end up on the news for helping break up a CP ring.
Also, crossposting isn't a toy, bid, grow up and leave.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,730
> read post > made by Syntax > proper spelling and grammar > my face when
Decode please
Syntax double-posted this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,731
@85,723 (vocalon !0oDERPONYY) > Also, crossposting isn't a toy, bid, grow up and leave.
Decode please
vocalon !0oDERPONYY replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,739
@previous (Syntax)
It was on Tinychan a couple of days ago.
I misspelled bud though.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,774
@previous (vocalon !0oDERPONYY)
Yea such happens. On occasions I cross post & or Cross reply. Users vary and at tymes I might go months away from here or TC nor will tymes overlap. Travels for work take me to places on Planet Earth where its difficult to connect to web. Hell in Australia I had a farm of 6 meter Satellite dishes but at tyme no Up and ready Satellites to use. I had the ultimate in a private network but no way to hack the router re the most powerful and serious US Gov watch dog ever invented "Echelon" right in my back yard.
Dial up modem for laptop would see a 9.6KBS telco line. 9.6 AFTER I applied sandpaper to terminals at junction box - out to telco demark and later busted into telco co to try and clean connections - never got beyond 9.6 Kb's Image boards suck with such.
Now with Firefox one can refuse view of image to speed much up.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,781
Pedophilia is a separate issue to child abuse. Please stop conflating the issues.
> Kidnapped children have been found and rescued - Challenge me to hit Google and dig up many examples.
Do it. Why not just do it in your first post?
> Legal vs Illegal. Lets take Legal for a moment. It was 100% Legal for Hitler to kill millions of innocent people, under German constitutional law. The same could be said of other Power Hungry idiots in other countries.
Source for this? I am of the understanding that it was not, hence why there is no documentation of it. All killings were done secretly because it was illegal. But I am not a early 20th century German Constitutional scholar and I admit I could be wrong.
> What is Morally right is the most proper way to do what is right. You support making it legal to rape a 8 year old child just because you think that if it were legal fewer children would be killed.
This is called a "strawman fallacy". You are attacking a position I never argued.
> Please consider that a life after such an event may be worse then actual DEATH.
You sicken me. Do non-religious people actually believe this trash?
> When you were 7 looking back now - Would you have been pleased being sodomized by a dozen men in a place where the laws could care less?
I would not have been, no. Why are you asking all these question about my sex life as a child? Are you getting your jollies from this?
> OP cannot click on URL and view a page no matter what it may show, without > >
>Downloading it<
> > OP viewed enough to know there may have been content that was illegal. Good for OP for not going further. I have about two times and immediately reported it, almost faster then the speed of light. Maybe 3 times? Nor did I go past any more content to see if any more on that URL was illegal - One quick disgusting view and results of Server going off and arrests and Prison tyme well it feels good yes yes.
OP says he did not click the link.
> You thought? When did you start thinking?? YOU Will end up in jail ganged raped, and I bet you will be thinking how did I get there. Consider Sewercide please.
I have no idea what you are talking about. You have admitted to 3 counts of possessing and producing Child Pornography. If anyone's going to jail, it's you.
> Stopping CP Child Abductions across state lines - Is FBI charter and as for Terrorist attacks???? The Terror is already a daily occurrence right in your own Hood rite now, by fucked up wackos who cook Meth and all sorts of shit inbreed people do and Terror is what CP is all about.
I don't live in the "hood". Drugs should not be the FBIs concern either. CP is not about terror, it is about sexual gratification.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,893
> > Typical arguments from those Pro Pedophilia. > > Pedophilia is a separate issue to child abuse. Please stop conflating the issues.
Bull Shite again typical crap promulgated by those into making CP legal > > > Kidnapped children have been found and rescued - Challenge me to hit Google and dig up many examples. > > Do it. Why not just do it in your first post? >
From Wiki with references:
"Children of all ages, including infants, are abused in the production of pornography. The United States Department of Justice estimates that pornographers have recorded the abuse of more than one million children in the United States alone. There is an increasing trend towards younger victims and greater brutality; according to Flint Waters, an investigator with the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, "These guys are raping infants and toddlers. You can hear the child crying, pleading for help in the video. It is horrendous." According to the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children, "While impossible to obtain accurate data, a perusal of the child pornography readily available on the international market indicates that a significant number of children are being sexually exploited through this medium."
"Child porn among fastest growing internet businesses". National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, USA. 2005-08-05. Retrieved 2008-03-13.
NCMEC transaction trends p3
Crosson-Tower, Cynthia (2005). Understanding child abuse and neglect. Allyn & Bacon. p. 208. ISBN 020540183X.
Richard Wortley, Stephen Smallbone. "Child Pornography on the Internet". Problem-Oriented Guides for Police No. 41: p14–16.
Levesque, Roger J. R. (1999). Sexual Abuse of Children: A Human Rights Perspective. Indiana University. pp. p64. ISBN 0253334713.
A Dozen more Paragraphs and 30 more references so no need to post what you would never wish to read because your sickness would not allow you to look at the facts of life.
> Legal vs Illegal. Lets take Legal for a moment. It was 100% Legal for Hitler to kill millions of innocent people, under German >constitutional law. The same could be said of other Power Hungry idiots in other countries.
> YOU SAY "Source for this? I am of the understanding that it was not, hence why there is no documentation of it. All killings were done >secretly because it was illegal. But I am not a early 20th century German Constitutional scholar and I admit I could be wrong."
On 30 January 1933, Adolf Hitler legally became Chancellor of Germany. The Gestapo (secret state police) under Heinrich Himmler persecuted the Jews, homosexuals, gypsies and anyone not born of pure German blood, attempting to force them into exile while taking their property, and then sending them openly by rail lines to concentration camps. The Party took control of the courts, and the constitution was modified so that only those of pure German blood could sue the Government, if the Government gave them permission to file the suit.
Relationships between any person considered “Aryan†and one that was not Aryan, were classified as Rassenschande and were forbidden and under penalty (people found guilty were sent to concentration camps, while non-Aryans could face the death penalty as well) If failed to report non-Aryans or protected them from being rounded up to be shipped off to concentration camps.
> Why are you asking all these question about my sex life as a child? Are you getting your jollies from this?
Only used you as a Metaphor for that child out there who is abused and used and or killed so that you can get your jollies off with CP - After all the point of your reply was that there is nada wrong with CP
OP Said > Someone posted a link that I suspect might be child porn. I want to report it but am scared to look at the video, so I'm not >completely sure if it's anything illegal. What should I do?
That means OP loaded the URL and had a page view of a Page - best guess is that he saw content that was suspect or he felt it lead directly to CP content.
> > I have no idea what you are talking about. You have admitted to 3 counts of possessing and producing Child Pornography. If >anyone's going to jail, it's you.
In essence of course I came across content that was 150% illegal - and I have told the story in full details over at TC or it might be here? Can tell it again but would first try and locate it so I need not waste tyme in repeat
What I did faster then the speed of light or close to it was look up what to do - I was NOT satisfied with results of what I was told to do by the DOJ/FBI web sites- So I contacted them directly in spite of being told not too. Gave them exactly what I found and why I was there in the first place, so that they knew I was not looking for that kind of content.
Servers shut down - Servers sold off - Website that is the legal portion closed for business and someone else bought it.
That is that was #1 discovered. and Y in short story cause the GAL yes a Bytch in Australia goes by Lady Delight was a asshole on a set of forums I played on. Several years later she ended up in court on a case re rape of her own daughter by her husband. She even ended up forced to give full disclosure on the internet several more years later as part of a plea deal. I was shocked to discover her hosting CP, she said it was all a mistrake lololo but of course not that funny.
> > Legal vs Illegal. Lets take Legal for a moment. It was 100% Legal for Hitler to kill millions of innocent people, under German constitutional law. The same could be said of other Power Hungry idiots in other countries. > > Source for this? I am of the understanding that it was not, hence why there is no documentation of it. All killings were done secretly because it was illegal. But I am not a early 20th century German Constitutional scholar and I admit I could be wrong. > > > What is Morally right is the most proper way to do what is right. You support making it legal to rape a 8 year old child just because you think that if it were legal fewer children would be killed. > > This is called a "strawman fallacy". You are attacking a position I never argued. > > >Please consider that a life after such an event may be worse then actual DEATH. > > You sicken me. Do non-religious people actually believe this trash? > > > When you were 7 looking back now - Would you have been pleased being sodomized by a dozen men in a place where the laws could care less? > > I would not have been, no. Why are you asking all these question about my sex life as a child? Are you getting your jollies from this? > > > OP cannot click on URL and view a page no matter what it may show, without > > > >
>Downloading it<
> > > > OP viewed enough to know there may have been content that was illegal. Good for OP for not going further. I have about two times and immediately reported it, almost faster then the speed of light. Maybe 3 times? Nor did I go past any more content to see if any more on that URL was illegal - One quick disgusting view and results of Server going off and arrests and Prison tyme well it feels good yes yes. > > OP says he did not click the link. > > > You thought? When did you start thinking?? YOU Will end up in jail ganged raped, and I bet you will be thinking how did I get there. Consider Sewercide please. > > I have no idea what you are talking about. You have admitted to 3 counts of possessing and producing Child Pornography. If anyone's going to jail, it's you. > > > Stopping CP Child Abductions across state lines - Is FBI charter and as for Terrorist attacks???? The Terror is already a daily occurrence right in your own Hood rite now, by fucked up wackos who cook Meth and all sorts of shit inbreed people do and Terror is what CP is all about. > > I don't live in the "hood". Drugs should not be the FBIs concern either. CP is not about terror, it is about sexual gratification.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,898
I did not see the content of the link. It was a video uploaded on Megavideo and I knew it was cp, because it was stated to be so in regards to a discussion on that subject.
cat !COOOOOLbus joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,916
oh my god just leave it there. cp's not the end of the world
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,918
Finish fapping. Run CCleaner. Report it.
cat !COOOOOLbus replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,926
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#85,929
@85,898 (A)
Would have been more better if you had explained at the Get Go but its still all the same re someone responsible should look if suspect content and report. Not as an excuse of course for people who will use that as excuse for...officer I was just trying to help DOJ ....after all if one reports one is known as a reporter and if one searches and searches ...for example DM and finds yet never reports then clearly the law will tag that person and they may could would end up on watch list.
One could refer to my ole project for a few years aka Project Echelon - and IF I were to with this IP type in just the right words I would make extra work for Echelon - and have even on purpose at times - Once promoting some mates I used to work with to ring me up for some laffs.
Anyway maybe just one person here will remember to be a good citizen. Good Citizens we need and hell that anon will at least learn some German history as result of your post.
@85,918 (J)
CC as a tool is good, others along with CC like ASC make it more useful and CC has an add on application for free from a source on web which makes CC far more better. HowSomEver CC will NOT get rid of all tracks from hard drive.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#86,030
> Bull Shite again typical crap promulgated by those into making CP legal
You must because you said so! What is evidence? What are facts? lol
> From Wiki with references: > "Children of all ages, including infants, are abused in the production of pornography. The United States Department of Justice estimates that pornographers have recorded the abuse of more than one million children in the United States alone. There is an increasing trend towards younger victims and greater brutality; according to Flint Waters, an investigator with the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, "These guys are raping infants and toddlers. You can hear the child crying, pleading for help in the video. It is horrendous." According to the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children, "While impossible to obtain accurate data, a perusal of the child pornography readily available on the international market indicates that a significant number of children are being sexually exploited through this medium." > > > "Child porn among fastest growing internet businesses". National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, USA. 2005-08-05. Retrieved 2008-03-13. > NCMEC transaction trends p3 > > Crosson-Tower, Cynthia (2005). Understanding child abuse and neglect. Allyn & Bacon. p. 208. ISBN 020540183X. > > Richard Wortley, Stephen Smallbone. "Child Pornography on the Internet". Problem-Oriented Guides for Police No. 41: p14–16. > > > Levesque, Roger J. R. (1999). Sexual Abuse of Children: A Human Rights Perspective. Indiana University. pp. p64. ISBN 0253334713. > > A Dozen more Paragraphs and 30 more references so no need to post what you would never wish to read because your sickness would not allow you to look at the facts of life.
LOL you were meant to be posting about about kids who were rescued because child pornography is criminalized. You still haven't. lol
> On 30 January 1933, Adolf Hitler legally became Chancellor of Germany. The Gestapo (secret state police) under Heinrich Himmler persecuted the Jews, homosexuals, gypsies and anyone not born of pure German blood, attempting to force them into exile while taking their property, and then sending them openly by rail lines to concentration camps. The Party took control of the courts, and the constitution was modified so that only those of pure German blood could sue the Government, if the Government gave them permission to file the suit. > > Relationships between any person considered “Aryan†and one that was not Aryan, were classified as Rassenschande and were forbidden and under penalty (people found guilty were sent to concentration camps, while non-Aryans could face the death penalty as well) If failed to report non-Aryans or protected them from being rounded up to be shipped off to concentration camps.
Well point me to the specific section it mentions the constitutionality of Hitler's actions.
> Only used you as a Metaphor for that child out there who is abused and used and or killed so that you can get your jollies off with CP - After all the point of your reply was that there is nada wrong with CP
wtf does this mean? Please rewrite in correct English.
> That means OP loaded the URL and had a page view of a Page - best guess is that he saw content that was suspect or he felt it lead directly to CP content.
No it doesn't. It could mean anything. It could mean someone posted a link that said "CLICK HERE FOR REALLY YOUNG BABES"
> In essence of course I came across content that was 150% illegal - and I have told the story in full details over at TC or it might be here? Can tell it again but would first try and locate it so I need not waste tyme in repeat > > What I did faster then the speed of light or close to it was look up what to do - I was NOT satisfied with results of what I was told to do by the DOJ/FBI web sites- So I contacted them directly in spite of being told not too. Gave them exactly what I found and why I was there in the first place, so that they knew I was not looking for that kind of content. > > Servers shut down - Servers sold off - Website that is the legal portion closed for business and someone else bought it. > > That is that was #1 discovered. and Y in short story cause the GAL yes a Bytch in Australia goes by Lady Delight was a asshole on a set of forums I played on. Several years later she ended up in court on a case re rape of her own daughter by her husband. She even ended up forced to give full disclosure on the internet several more years later as part of a plea deal. I was shocked to discover her hosting CP, she said it was all a mistrake lololo but of course not that funny.
Either way, you're guilty of a crime. You possessed and produced Child Pornography.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#86,454
@previous (K) > Either way, you're guilty of a crime. You possessed and produced Child Pornography.
No Yes....I possessed it and sent it directly to the FBI, you on the other hand get off on CP; Otherwise you would not still be defending it.
Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#86,478
@previous (Syntax)
This is an ad hominem fallacy. I demand that you immediately apologize for this slanderous and untrue allegation.
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#86,619
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,675
@86,478 (K)
Slander of who/whom/what/where/why/ @previous (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
Baseless who/whom/what/where/why/
!Neku082OLc replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,681
@86,478 (K)
Do you even know what ad hominem means?
GO back to playing Forumwarz.
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,684
@86,675 (Syntax)
You said that he get's off on cp and you have no proof of that. Come on, be reasonable.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 52 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,716
@86,681 (!Neku082OLc)
Ah common now I am not necessarily trying to invalidate the argument. Questions of personal conduct, character, motives, are legitimate and relevant to this issue.
Forumwarz lolol yes yes and hummmmmmmmm TC MC AnT is what???? or do I include 4Chan and ED in the mix. ad hominem my ass!
@previous (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
You lost me there. The OP is not getting off on CP
Now if you really really want the Gods honest truth on the subject of CP and how many here really feel about the subject, then I suggest you review the status of the current poll on this forum. Notice the high number of votes for Decriminalize. Its one thing to set up a poll on Yes or No for CP
The Decriminalize is a well chosen/selected/ means to ferret out the true feelings of those voting.
Decriminalize the rape of 8 year olds? Decriminalize parents who sell the kids as sex slaves...Hummmmmm anyway I suspect/expect those that voted that way to end up here as Anons defending that point of view. So pardon me if i see someone nick picking apart my points of view to do as you damn well know they just may be doing....of course you are free to say no one who voted to decriminalize would end up in this topic.
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 48 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,776
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,780
@86,716 (Syntax)
You wouldn't be decriminalizing rape. You would be decriminalizing having footage of a crime. The reason that people have a problem with this it that it's not illegal to have footage of other crimes, so why is it illegal to have cp?
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,887
but not rape or murder or beatings or bestiality etc
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,895
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Video of murder is legal in America.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,897
@86,893 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Why put bestiality in the same list as murder or beatings? Bestiality isn't even illegal in all states, and animal porn certainly isn't illegal. Producing it might be illegal in some states, but it's perfectly legal to view it. There are perfectly legit animal porn sites out there.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,911
> Bestiality isn't even illegal in all states, and animal porn certainly isn't illegal.
It is here. Obscene Publications Act 1964 and Criminal Justice and immigration Act 2008, mother fucker.
DrGreen !pFNWNYROxA joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,914
Check out my chili corn. Inb4 sick fuck.
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,931
@86,911 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
I'm not necessarily saying it's a good thing, it's just strange how it's basically legal here to have footage of any crime but child abuse.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,971
@86,911 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Interesting get, given the subject matter. Is 911 the number for emergencies over there too? Or is it 991 or something like that?
!Neku082OLc replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#86,973
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,019
@86,776 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
Not really sure who I stated was...I thought I had stated that more then Anon was...Because this Topic was a cross post on MC and TC - Whats said for my part should be the same thing. And remember the complexity of say Anonymous K, who may be Anonymous A to any letter to Z. So if I say Anonymous "X" is into CP, you should understand that when someone becomes Anonymous they just might end up being tagged. They can come on out and argue why its just not true. Asking me to prove it is???? Trolling could be what that asking for proof is all about.
Me? Given over the years with helping to track down serious CP offenders while assisting the 1000's of people in Telco CO's and ISP NOC's and Cell System SP - Each with specially equipped vault like rooms who's lives work wise - provide for law enforcement Lawful Intercepts. This is a HUGE Business. Multiple companies who make software and hardware just for the purpose. Most of them came from Project Echelon to start up the tracking down equipment businesses. So pardon me if I take this seriously. Even in my days of working for the US State Dept (cover position) I helped with that effort and often off the books. Not always CP, on occasions Child labor of illegal nature with product shipped into USA
Syntax double-posted this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,026
@86,780 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
To possess footage of CP means that person has feed $$$$ to the producer one way or the other. That keeps the crime going. I minored for two years in Law at UCLA and learned that I don't nor will ever know FUCK about the law, other then to know when to use attorneys and what to expect of them.
I think it comes down to the contributing. Similar to putting bullets into the gun, or paying for a "hit" but not using the weapon for the kill or doing the crime directly. Call it Crime by Proxy. So possession must be viewed that way. MY Quick take on how the law looks at it.
In the USA the possession of prescribed medications with someone else's name- that could end up in my medication cabinet, if that cabinet is mine alone, it would be illegal for me to possess them. Even non narcotics. Of course this varies state by state except for the Narcotics. Just an example of possession of something that is against the law. CP is exactly that.
@86,911 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Bestiality is forbidden by 99.9% of SP's in the USA. One or Two may allow, but the next Upstream Server's TOS will forbid it. Is it legal from a Federal point of view? I do not know.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Katerina Shcherbatskaya joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,064
@86,780 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
IMO, possessing any image of unsimulated rape should be illegal. It would be maddening to know that strangers (or worse) are free to take pleasure in your sexual assault for as long as the images exist, maybe forever. The victim deserves closure.
@86,890 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
In the UK, possession of "disgusting" pornography featuring consenting adults is punishable by jail time.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,073
@previous (Katerina Shcherbatskaya)
It does get tricky the USA Supreme court makes Porn illegal. What qualifies as Porn is really unknown. In 1964, Justice Potter Stewart tried to explain "hard-core" pornography, or what is obscene, by saying, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . But I know it when I see it . . .
(a) an act which threatens a person’s life,
(b) an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person’s anus, breasts or genitals,
(c) an act which involves or appears to involve sexual interference with a human corpse,
(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive),
and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person or animal was real.
totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,223
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
So faked sexual situations are illegal as well?
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,224
@87,218 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
Honestly no clue. I suspect you can find that information from the WWW
Katerina Shcherbatskaya replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,251
@87,215 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm) > What about footage of murder?
Footage of murder isn't as degrading and humiliating as footage of rape, and isn't generally used for prurient purposes.
@87,217 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
It is punishable, including faked sexual situations. Did you not click the link? I agree that it's a horrible law.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#87,257
@87,223 (totofoeme !!VnSc8bbUm)
You ask them a good question. This kind of thing has come up in courts of law. Movies are full of faked sex. A very few main stream ones have real sex.
When I did my gig at MCA/Universal I would look in on movies being made and what appeared to be fully nude, was often a vanity shield for tiny parts of private parts. Guys were usually limp of dick because of the 25 takes or more to get that shot in the can.