Never satisfied joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#618,750
They're atheist, so you'd have a fair old task resolving his message against their philosophy.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,752
|βʒ| Meowth joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,758
@previous (C)
I made this point to a friend of mine. Extreme butthurt ensued as I lol'd heavily.
Edit: I asked why he believes in God and stuff, and one of the main reasons he made was somewhere along the lines of well the bible is so old or some shit that it must be true. And yeah..
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,759
@previous (|βʒ| Meowth)
I totally don't understand.
|βʒ| Meowth replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,763
@previous (B)
A friend of mine tried to say that one of the main reasons he's a believer is because the bible is so old that it must be true. I told him Buddhism is older than his bible.
Syntax replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,767
@618,758 (|βʒ| Meowth)
Next door neighbors are Self-Realization Fellowship Temple
Its kinda a hodgepodge of Hindu Christian and you name it they have a statue in honor of it. All bases covered so they have Buddhist stuff in gardens
So I see Monks who visit - hard to miss their robes. Have attended events to Honor some high mucky muck Monk - Once the highest of the high.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,770
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 25 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,785
@618,781 (C)
Correct me if I am wrong, but a traditional Buddhist would not believe in a God. They would not believe the universe was created. Nor a beginning of time. They realise that on a certain level, at least in some sense, that the universe does not even exist.
It has been explained here before quite well, and if I have misinterpreted then as I say, you can correct me.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,788
@618,775 (B)
I'm a hard atheist, so that about sums up my view on all this.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,790
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Are you Buddhist?
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,791
@previous (B)
My previous reply pretty much answered that.
|βʒ| Meowth replied with this 11 years ago, 59 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#618,792
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#618,799
@618,785 (B)
Buddha would consider your point irrelevant. In fact Buddha considered the origins of the universe is irrelevant. For instance
In the eyes of the Buddha, the world is the cycle of repeated births and deaths. To Him, the beginning of the world and the end of the world is ...Just IS.
Since elements and energies are relative and inter-dependent, it is meaningless to single out anything as the beginning. Whatever speculation we make regarding the origin of the world, there is no absolute truth in our notion.
'Infinite is the sky, infinite is the number of beings,
Infinite are the worlds in the vast universe,
Infinite in wisdom the Buddha teaches these,
Infinite are the virtues of Him who teaches these.
Then the Buddha said that He would not go into a discussion of the origin of the Universe. To Him, gaining knowledge about such matters was a waste of time because a man's task was to liberate himself from the present, not the past or the future.