Topic: Personal opinions on the Ruby programming language?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago#46,315
I heard this language was close to English so naturally I loaded up a tutorial on Code Academy to check it out. I must say that as far as readability wise it is very well structured.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#611,174
I like Ruby a lot. It's the language I am currently most proficient at writing and reading.
Ruby 1.8 had memory management issues, but really only because it was written for scripting and not intended for long-running web server processes.
Ruby 1.9 improved garbage collection a little and sped things up a bit. The syntax for hashes became a little better—like JSON. It had some stability issues in many of its minor versions so there was a lot of frustration and confusion to be had.
Ruby 2.0 I never used.
Ruby 2.1 and 2.2 are strongly world class languages. I'm able to be as productive as the language intends to be and I'm able to produce quality code that is easy to maintain.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#611,197
seriouspost: its a great language and you can integrate it with others like jscript etc
regular post: faggot FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 39 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#611,206
it has a cute name. we need more programming languages with cute names.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#611,209
@611,140 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
The only other programming languages to share a name with RWBY characters are Emerald and Mercury, so Ruby might want to watch her back...