Topic: American arses are so big and shitty they need to take toilet paper when they travel
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #46,092
https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/jets-bring-350-rolls-toilet-185714941.html
New York jets are coming to London so nee to bring their own bog roll.
New York jets are coming to London so nee to bring their own bog roll.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 48 seconds later[^] [v] #608,444
Alternative title: American toilet paper, just like everything else American, is the best in the world.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,445
not sure if svet
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,446
The French avoid this problem entirely.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,448
@608,444 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If you fuckers stop eating steroid injected meat with every meal and snack maybe you would need such thick paper to remove that sticky shit off those fat arses.
If you fuckers stop eating steroid injected meat with every meal and snack maybe you would need such thick paper to remove that sticky shit off those fat arses.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,452
@608,446 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
I thought USAmericans did too, by getting butt splashed with shitty ass water. That wont happen in EUKingdom so I guess toilet paper is appropriate.
I thought USAmericans did too, by getting butt splashed with shitty ass water. That wont happen in EUKingdom so I guess toilet paper is appropriate.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,454
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,455
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,456
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 50 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,457
Malachite joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #608,459
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #608,462
@608,457 (E)
Yes, because it's abundant, durable, less destructive than oil-based synthetic products, and I'm not a militant vegan whom is black and white on ethics.
@previous (Malachite)
Because my inherited English genetics are really poor at cholesterol management and I'm strongly at risk for cancer and heart disease. Eating well has significantly improved my health markers that indicate I will be unlikely to die like my Nana did from congestive heart failure at 69 years old.
Yes, because it's abundant, durable, less destructive than oil-based synthetic products, and I'm not a militant vegan whom is black and white on ethics.
@previous (Malachite)
Because my inherited English genetics are really poor at cholesterol management and I'm strongly at risk for cancer and heart disease. Eating well has significantly improved my health markers that indicate I will be unlikely to die like my Nana did from congestive heart failure at 69 years old.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #608,472
@previous (C)
You don't eat the flesh, but instead wear the skin? Abundant, durable, less destructive, and lets not forget fashionable!
You don't eat the flesh, but instead wear the skin? Abundant, durable, less destructive, and lets not forget fashionable!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #608,473
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #608,480
Metæ? joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #608,490
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #608,491
@previous (Metæ?)
I don't know—I'm not a geneticist or epidemiologist. I do know that both sides of my family are English ancestry and there's a horrible string of cancer and heart disease. My family members that avoid red meat are in significantly better health than the full omnivores.
I don't know—I'm not a geneticist or epidemiologist. I do know that both sides of my family are English ancestry and there's a horrible string of cancer and heart disease. My family members that avoid red meat are in significantly better health than the full omnivores.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #608,499
@OP
*asses
*asses
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 8 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #608,570
@608,490 (Metæ?)
English genes are overall superior. You just have to look at the effects our small nation has had on the entire globe to see we punch well above our weight.
English genes are overall superior. You just have to look at the effects our small nation has had on the entire globe to see we punch well above our weight.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #608,571
So fucking typical. It's that "American exceptionalism" bullshit.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #608,813
wot did u say 2 me dikhed
kook !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #608,814
What kind of low grade toilet paper do they have there?