Topic: Reminder of how unautistic I really am
Sophie started this discussion 11 years ago #45,965
Taken before 'Aspie' was annoyingly rephrased to 'neurodiverse' by the test's creator.
My intellectual 'talents' (lol) have a very slight neurotypical bias. When it comes to physical perception though, I'm highly neurotypical (as in negroidal and cerebellularly dominated; rythmic, timed, soulful as opposed to calculated-yet-clumsy).
That doesn't surprise me. Yet, this eludes those psychiatrists uninterested in knowing who I actually am.
My intellectual 'talents' (lol) have a very slight neurotypical bias. When it comes to physical perception though, I'm highly neurotypical (as in negroidal and cerebellularly dominated; rythmic, timed, soulful as opposed to calculated-yet-clumsy).
That doesn't surprise me. Yet, this eludes those psychiatrists uninterested in knowing who I actually am.
Sophie (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 36 seconds later[^] [v] #606,643
Forgot picAnonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #606,645
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,653
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,656
@606,645 (B)
@previous (C)
I'm sure such a meal is simply gourmet by your standard, but it's not to taste. Sorry.
@previous (C)
I'm sure such a meal is simply gourmet by your standard, but it's not to taste. Sorry.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,657
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,659
@previous (B)
When applied to vermin like you. But you mistook me for such untermensch and decided I'd be appeased by such an offering.
When applied to vermin like you. But you mistook me for such untermensch and decided I'd be appeased by such an offering.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,662
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,663
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,665
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 14 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,666
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 45 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,667
@previous (C)
I'm sorry that you missed that my sarcasm denotes indifference to your retarded little meme.
Please see a better shrink.
I'm sorry that you missed that my sarcasm denotes indifference to your retarded little meme.
Please see a better shrink.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,670
@previous (Sophie)
Are you sure you were being sarcastic? People with autism have trouble using and understanding sarcasm. Maybe you meant to say something else?
Are you sure you were being sarcastic? People with autism have trouble using and understanding sarcasm. Maybe you meant to say something else?
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,671
@previous (B)
My test denotes neurotypical intellectual talents. The problem can then only reasonably be your interpretation, suggesting relatively severer autism.
An upward inflection starting at the words 'I'm sure' would've been heavily implied by the contextual text-voice alone, were you an actual neurotypical and not an over-compensating sperg.
My test denotes neurotypical intellectual talents. The problem can then only reasonably be your interpretation, suggesting relatively severer autism.
An upward inflection starting at the words 'I'm sure' would've been heavily implied by the contextual text-voice alone, were you an actual neurotypical and not an over-compensating sperg.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,672
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 35 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,673
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,674
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,675
@previous (B)
I've won by default.
Don't substitute a winning strategy with the hope that I'll be frustrated by your laziness in future. It just says everything about you and nothing but underestimation of me. Cheers.
I've won by default.
Don't substitute a winning strategy with the hope that I'll be frustrated by your laziness in future. It just says everything about you and nothing but underestimation of me. Cheers.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,677
Wow, that graph looks really scientific. It must be true.
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 58 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,678
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
It wasn't produced by me and I answered all questions to the most honest of recollections.
I had no expectation for the score set and as such wouldn't know how to produce a similar pattern via. malignering.
There's a good chance that although not completely accurate is representative enough.
Now fuck off with your sarcasm.
It wasn't produced by me and I answered all questions to the most honest of recollections.
I had no expectation for the score set and as such wouldn't know how to produce a similar pattern via. malignering.
There's a good chance that although not completely accurate is representative enough.
Now fuck off with your sarcasm.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #606,681
@previous (Sophie)
Oh you were honest, so that much make it true. I guess all Facebook tests are accurate as long as I'm truthful.
Oh you were honest, so that much make it true. I guess all Facebook tests are accurate as long as I'm truthful.
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #606,682
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
RDOS' was peer-reviewed you fucking twit.
I suppose academic hypotheses would run over your head were they not condensed to some normiefagbook dittie; this was a long, drawn-out battery of almost 200 questions. I wouldn't have the endurance to take this again, and barely had back then; it's not something you can reliably and consistently maligner.
RDOS' was peer-reviewed you fucking twit.
I suppose academic hypotheses would run over your head were they not condensed to some normiefagbook dittie; this was a long, drawn-out battery of almost 200 questions. I wouldn't have the endurance to take this again, and barely had back then; it's not something you can reliably and consistently maligner.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 48 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,689
kook !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,690
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,691
taking online personality test? check
taking it to seriously? check
you're fucking autistic.
taking it to seriously? check
you're fucking autistic.
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,692
@previous (squeegee)
You pontificate about theoretical physics yet can't use the correct form of 'too'.
This disparity in system mastery is also all too typical of autism.
You pontificate about theoretical physics yet can't use the correct form of 'too'.
This disparity in system mastery is also all too typical of autism.
Sophie (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,693
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,697
@606,692 (Sophie)
> You pontificate about theoretical physics
what? when the fuck have i ever done that?
> yet can't use the correct form of 'too'.
i have a job, so the time i save not using duplicate leters ads to my productivity. if you were a working woman you'd find similar time saving measures.
> This disparity in system mastery is also all too typical of autism.
if i have autism it doesn't impact my life enough for me to have ever neded diagnosing.
> You pontificate about theoretical physics
what? when the fuck have i ever done that?
> yet can't use the correct form of 'too'.
i have a job, so the time i save not using duplicate leters ads to my productivity. if you were a working woman you'd find similar time saving measures.
> This disparity in system mastery is also all too typical of autism.
if i have autism it doesn't impact my life enough for me to have ever neded diagnosing.
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,699
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,700
@previous (Sophie)i'm sorry your head pounding tantrums and stimming routines made you blatantly obvious
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,702
@previous (squeegee)
Hardly. You're speaking with me now, whilst I'm doing neither of those things, nor have I ever done either.
Hardly. You're speaking with me now, whilst I'm doing neither of those things, nor have I ever done either.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,706
word salad
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,707
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,709
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,726
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,742
brie !uXWPG0MygI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,758
I let a doctor get away with calling me a polymorphic sideshow.
Felt grate.
Siri-O-lee.
ONTOPIC: I have so many diagnoses that I no longer am concerned with what the establishment wants to label me.
Felt grate.
Siri-O-lee.
ONTOPIC: I have so many diagnoses that I no longer am concerned with what the establishment wants to label me.
10 goto 40 20 def A polymorph 30 def B sideshow 40 PRINT A+B 50 goto 10
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Sophie (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #606,990
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #606,993
Million Masturbator March joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #607,011
"scientists discover why you don't like the sound of your own recorded voice: you sound like a fag" -- Scientific American