Topic: So, what is Toni really studying?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #45,923
She appears to be majoring in Fatfuck apologetics.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #606,139
in B4 matts merry men etcKiller Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,143
So is this a Minichan hazing? New arrivals get bullied a bit by the local trolls- if they can take it, they're in?Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #606,146
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Nah. It's becoming clear that Toni isn't all that she claims to be.
Nah. It's becoming clear that Toni isn't all that she claims to be.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #606,163
reptilian infiltration
kook !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #606,170
Gender theory
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #606,173
@previous (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
Unlikely. Her posts show very little understanding of the subject matter.
Unlikely. Her posts show very little understanding of the subject matter.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,216
How to commit suicide for under $10
Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 43 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,233
I am studying psychology. Why do you doubt it?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,279
@previous (Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q)
Because you defend Matt and deride Syntax while know nothing about either.
Because you defend Matt and deride Syntax while know nothing about either.
Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,285
@previous (A)
I do not know either. I was asked specific questions about Matt, and I think Syntax's posting style is odd. How is that hard to believe?
I do not know either. I was asked specific questions about Matt, and I think Syntax's posting style is odd. How is that hard to believe?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,303
@previous (Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q)
The way that you dismissed his ongoing victimization of various women (both online and in real life) as a trivial matter is suspicious in the extreme.
The way that you dismissed his ongoing victimization of various women (both online and in real life) as a trivial matter is suspicious in the extreme.
Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,307
@previous (A)
I answered truthfully. From a scientific point of view, grown men like teenage girls. It is evolutionary. Also, I can sense the anger and personal vindication in the tone of your text, which is why I was careful to state that rumors are often untrue. You obviously have a personal problem. Also, you do demonstrate a little paranoia.
I answered truthfully. From a scientific point of view, grown men like teenage girls. It is evolutionary. Also, I can sense the anger and personal vindication in the tone of your text, which is why I was careful to state that rumors are often untrue. You obviously have a personal problem. Also, you do demonstrate a little paranoia.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,310
@previous (Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q)
but evolutionary psychology is garbage and absolutely not a science so that makes everything you say bullshit
but evolutionary psychology is garbage and absolutely not a science so that makes everything you say bullshit
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #606,350
@606,307 (Toni !gM.fIrVe1Q)
You've shown a complete lack of empathy towards victimized women and have given consistently evasive answers whenever Matt's misogynistic behavior was referenced. Just out of curiosity - you mentioned that you were attracted exclusively to biological females and have stated at least twice that you consider an attraction to underaged females to be perfectly normal. Does that mean that you would be willing to break the law and have sex with a minor if the opportunity arose? To avoid your splitting hairs, let's say the victim is 15, you are aware of her age and you're both living in a country where the legal age of consent is sixteen.
You've shown a complete lack of empathy towards victimized women and have given consistently evasive answers whenever Matt's misogynistic behavior was referenced. Just out of curiosity - you mentioned that you were attracted exclusively to biological females and have stated at least twice that you consider an attraction to underaged females to be perfectly normal. Does that mean that you would be willing to break the law and have sex with a minor if the opportunity arose? To avoid your splitting hairs, let's say the victim is 15, you are aware of her age and you're both living in a country where the legal age of consent is sixteen.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)