Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Will we send a man to Mars in a millennial's lifetime?

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #45,698

NASA seems focused to send a human to Mars.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #603,041

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mission_to_Mars#Current_intentions

> The first manned Mars Mission, which will include sending astronauts to Mars, orbiting Mars, and a return to Earth, is currently scheduled for the 2030s

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #603,044

@previous (B)
You mean it's not going to get delayed until the 2130's?

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #603,055

like millenials would even care...

Million Moose March joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #603,058

just send a dead body there, because that's pretty much the result anyway

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,125

@previous (Million Moose March)
Yeah, that seems the most likely outcome at this point.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,126

@previous (E)
Who wouldn't want to die on an alien world?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,129

@previous (A)
Sane people.

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,130

@603,126 (A)
I wouldn't.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,134

@603,129 (F)
@previous (E)
How would you prefer to die?

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,136

@previous (A)
Of old age in bed next to a beautiful woman.

Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,152

@603,134 (A)
I would prefer not to. Thanks.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,198

You have a real talent for mangling the English language in odd ways, Catherine. It's quite remarkable.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 33 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,207

considering the latest someone can be considered a millenial is around 1993, i'm guessing probably

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,219

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 25 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,230

@603,207 (H)
that seems a little too early.

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,310

@603,198 (G)
Why do you think OP is Catherine?

Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,321

@previous (E)
> NASA seems focused to send a human to Mars.
> seems focused to send

It's a classic Catherine grammar error. She fucks up preposition and tense like a native Chinese speaker.

kook !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,326

Op are you Catherine?

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 48 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,359

@603,321 (G)
Could be anyone. Catherine normally uses a handle, why would s/he post anonymously for this particular thread?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,367

I dont know to be honest, its a far larger undertaking then going to the moon cause its farther. That means more expensive, and people need to basically expect they will never come back cause that could happen. DIdnt stop people from going to the moon, though.

kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,373

@603,359 (E)
"Normally"

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,392

@previous (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
OK, so Catherine isn't normal, she's exceptional. Irregardless, why would s/he alter hi/r standard operating procedure for this post?

kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,395

@previous (E)
No I wasn't calling him abnormal. I was saying that he posts anonymously, frequently

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,399

@603,392 (E)
"Irregardless" isn't a word, Robert.

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 26 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,408

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Actually, it is, Kimmo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
Irregardless is a word commonly used in place of regardless or irrespective, which has caused controversy since the early twentieth century, though the word appeared in print as early as 1795.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,409

@previous (E)
It's negatory and, thus, not a word.

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #603,413

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Then why is it referred to as a word, and why is it listed as an adjective in the Oxford dictionary?

Million Moose March replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #603,459

jsut beccaouse someithing is a word doesn't mean that it isn't shitty and for stupuid

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #603,473

@previous (Million Moose March)

> jsut beccaouse someithing is a word doesn't mean that it isn't shitty and for stupuid

You're a poe, right?

Million Moose March replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #603,491

@previous (E)
is that tyapo for poet

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #603,496

@previous (Million Moose March)
No. I was actually referring to "Poe's Law".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Million Moose March replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #603,521

@previous (E)
oh I forgot what that is

wait something about paradoy to close tot real is that right

Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #603,522

@previous (Million Moose March)
Yep.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.