Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Actually it was a factual reply which answered the question.
dw replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#602,942
@previous (C)
No it's not because retina is a meaningless term stamped onto every Apple product. It doesn't really describe anything objectively (because it is for marketing purposes).
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#602,945
dw replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#603,004
@previous (C)
they are pretty common resolutions nowadays
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 36 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#603,012
@previous (dw)
the resolution is common, the DPI isn't. it is for phones because the screens are small. makeing a large screen TV with the DPI of the "retina" display is still pretty expensive, as far as i know, but if they aren't pushing consumer versions of that kind of thing yet they will very soon. i think even 4k screens don't have that kind of DPI. (i may be wrong, i'll bing yahoo answers and see)
interesting trivia: i've used an oculus rift lens on my cell phone screen and i can't see the pixels even with moderate magnification
dw replied with this 11 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#603,133
@previous (squeegee)
OP asked about macs. The computer i'm using right now has a 13 inch 3200x1800 screen.