Topic: I just watched the film, "The Lost Tribe" from 2010.
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #45,261 What a piece of cinematic garbage.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 3 minutes later[^] [v] #597,311 Why's that?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,313 @previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
IMDB says it all, a horror movie with the rating of 3.9
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 15 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,314 @previous (C)
Out of what?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago , 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,318 @previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
3.9 out of 10.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago , 52 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,321 It is a total rip-off of Predator, but with even worse acting and a ridiculous sub-plot about the Catholic Church trying to deny evolution, even though the Pope in 1950s accepted it. It also suffers terribly from Horror Movie Syndrome, i.e. when characters do stupid deadly things that no normal human would ever do.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago , 29 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,323 @597,318 (C)
but then again
the room got a terrible rating but if you watch it knowing you are going to see a bad movie then that film turns into a masterpiece.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago , 42 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,325 @597,318 (C)
3,9 out of 10 out of what?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago , 7 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,333 @previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
1.200 votes. I guess thats to small to be taken seriously.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago , 13 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,343 @previous (C)
No, I mean like what does 10
mean ?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago , 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,346 @previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
That's
too deep for me Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago , 1 second later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,347 @597,343 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
10 in quality
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago , 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,350 @previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
But what does it actually mean to be a 10 in quality?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago , 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #597,351 @previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
It means to be perfect, in terms of quality.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #597,416 @previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
So this movie is 39% perfect?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #597,452 @previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Yeah
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #597,520 @597,416 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
or is it 61% flawed?
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago , 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #597,526 @597,452 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
How does one establish that a movie is 39% perfect?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #597,600 @597,321 (A)
Who was the Pope in the 1950's?
↕