Topic: Mount McKinley outrage
Million Mong March started this discussion 11 years ago #45,166
The fuckers are going to change its name to something that I probably won't remember at all. So far I remember it as Dinall. What the fuck is a dinall.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 22 minutes later[^] [v] #596,270
You can't remember "Denali"?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,382
What in the fuck are you even talking about?
Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,400
I like Denali. It reminds me of the GMC Yukon Denali, which has a really tasteful chrome grill.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 37 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,405
connor fah ass mckinley
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,407
Seriously couldn't care what people are calling a mountain.
Million Mong March (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,463
Dinali? What the fuck is a dinali?
Anyway, it's the tallest North American mountain
Anyway, it's the tallest North American mountain
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,511
@previous (Million Mong March)
That dumb nigger in the white house wanted to make a change.... Fuck what the Americans thought about it.
That dumb nigger in the white house wanted to make a change.... Fuck what the Americans thought about it.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,513
Million Mong March (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,679
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
what the fuck is a denali though, they need to do some proper promotional work here
what the fuck is a denali though, they need to do some proper promotional work here
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,684
lol manufactured right wing outrage at anything remotely connected to obama
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #596,797
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,798
*revert
hater !JGlOo5d1iU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,800
Wait, they're changing the name to respect a people that have to be denied alcohol or they end up raping all their kids?
The indigenous people of Alaska are absolute garbage, worse than the most stereotypical image of African Americans.
Pandering to such a shitty group is pathetic. Though, if Alaska wants it done, why can't they just change the name? Why do they need anyone else's approval? It's their mountain, but I guess its on federal land?
The indigenous people of Alaska are absolute garbage, worse than the most stereotypical image of African Americans.
Pandering to such a shitty group is pathetic. Though, if Alaska wants it done, why can't they just change the name? Why do they need anyone else's approval? It's their mountain, but I guess its on federal land?
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,802
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,805
Million Mong March (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,806
Million Mong March (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,808
@596,802 (J)
let's all visit there and steal a bit of the fucker
not so tall now, are you, Tall Fucker.
let's all visit there and steal a bit of the fucker
not so tall now, are you, Tall Fucker.
Anonymous J replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,810
This is a slippery slope for USAmericans, if they acknowledge that a place had a name before colonialism then they acknowledge previous ownership, subsequent theft, and the right of return.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,812
@previous (J)
Easy solution, offer them some alcohol(right then and there) or the land back, guarantee they don't choose the land.
Absolute worthless drunks. The rates of Interfamilial rape are atrocious. These people can't be expected to self govern. It would be an endless rape nightmare for the young women and girls.
Easy solution, offer them some alcohol(right then and there) or the land back, guarantee they don't choose the land.
Absolute worthless drunks. The rates of Interfamilial rape are atrocious. These people can't be expected to self govern. It would be an endless rape nightmare for the young women and girls.
Anonymous J replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,815
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,826
@596,800 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
lmao you obviously haven't even researched the topic even in a basic way before having an opinion on it
The locals have called it Dinali forever. Nobody there calls it Mount McKinley. The Alaskan government changed the name in 1975 to reflect what people actually call it.
This isn't a request to change the name it's the department of the interior changing all references for Denali to use that name instead of Mt McKinley
And I don't know why you're getting on your high horse about native people raping kids when you are a fucking paedo, you're just as bad.
Tl;Dr your opinion on the matter is worth jack shit
lmao you obviously haven't even researched the topic even in a basic way before having an opinion on it
The locals have called it Dinali forever. Nobody there calls it Mount McKinley. The Alaskan government changed the name in 1975 to reflect what people actually call it.
This isn't a request to change the name it's the department of the interior changing all references for Denali to use that name instead of Mt McKinley
And I don't know why you're getting on your high horse about native people raping kids when you are a fucking paedo, you're just as bad.
Tl;Dr your opinion on the matter is worth jack shit
Million Mong March (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,908
Endless Rape Nightmare, by Stephen King
kook !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,910
@596,826 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Being a pedo is not just as bad as raping kids. How could you say such a thing?
Being a pedo is not just as bad as raping kids. How could you say such a thing?
Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,912
@596,810 (J)> This is a slippery slope for USAmericans, if they acknowledge that a place had a name before colonialism then they acknowledge previous ownership, subsequent theft, and the right of return.
US paid Russia $7.2 million for Alaska. So Russia stole Alaska from the natives and sold the stolen property to US.
Currently Alaska's most infamous citizen is:
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,914
@596,810 (J)
Wait how long have the locals been calling it Denali? From before Alaska was part of the U.S.
Wait how long have the locals been calling it Denali? From before Alaska was part of the U.S.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,934
@596,910 (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
It's not as bad but it does kind of blunt the argument "we shouldn't do this because those guys like fucking children and that's terrible"
It's not as bad but it does kind of blunt the argument "we shouldn't do this because those guys like fucking children and that's terrible"
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,938
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,940
@596,826 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
> lmao you obviously haven't even researched the topic even in a basic way before having an opinion on it
>
> The locals have called it Dinali forever. Nobody there calls it Mount McKinley. The Alaskan government changed the name in 1975 to reflect what people actually call it.
>
> This isn't a request to change the name it's the department of the interior changing all references for Denali to use that name instead of Mt McKinley
>
> And I don't know why you're getting on your high horse about native people raping kids when you are a fucking paedo, you're just as bad.
>
> Tl;Dr your opinion on the matter is worth jack shit
Pretty much this.
> lmao you obviously haven't even researched the topic even in a basic way before having an opinion on it
>
> The locals have called it Dinali forever. Nobody there calls it Mount McKinley. The Alaskan government changed the name in 1975 to reflect what people actually call it.
>
> This isn't a request to change the name it's the department of the interior changing all references for Denali to use that name instead of Mt McKinley
>
> And I don't know why you're getting on your high horse about native people raping kids when you are a fucking paedo, you're just as bad.
>
> Tl;Dr your opinion on the matter is worth jack shit
Pretty much this.
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,941
@596,934 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
But days ago you said that lolicon is okay. What do you actually believe?
But days ago you said that lolicon is okay. What do you actually believe?
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,944
i lived in alaska and we always called it denali or mckinley, plus the park it is located in is also denali national park
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,945
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,952
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Do you actually believe that thinking about doing bad things is equivalent to actually doing bad things, and do you believe that people who draw lolicon cannot be protective of actual children?
Do you actually believe that thinking about doing bad things is equivalent to actually doing bad things, and do you believe that people who draw lolicon cannot be protective of actual children?
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,955
@previous (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
Answer to question one, no. But if you think about doing bad things and really want to, you can't use the fact that other people think about or even do those things as a reason to hate them. It's hypocritical.
Question two, I think lolicon is just drawings, no children are bothered or harmed, people who collect it aren't necessarily attracted to children and that all in all it doesn't affect anything relevant to me one way or the other so idc
Answer to question one, no. But if you think about doing bad things and really want to, you can't use the fact that other people think about or even do those things as a reason to hate them. It's hypocritical.
Question two, I think lolicon is just drawings, no children are bothered or harmed, people who collect it aren't necessarily attracted to children and that all in all it doesn't affect anything relevant to me one way or the other so idc
(Edited 59 seconds later.)
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,957
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
That doesn't make much sense. Someone who has had a fleeting thought about killing someone isn't a hypocrite for hating a murderer.
Who collects lolicon without a sexual reason?
That doesn't make much sense. Someone who has had a fleeting thought about killing someone isn't a hypocrite for hating a murderer.
Who collects lolicon without a sexual reason?
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,965
why do any of you care about this? are you all from the same backwater shithole?
Million Mong March (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,966
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,968
@596,957 (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
No but paedophiles don't have fleeting thoughts about having sex with children so that comparison doesn't work
I don't think anybody does but at the same time I don't think many people collect it for the sole reason that it depicts children, I think for the majority the appeal is in breaking a taboo
No but paedophiles don't have fleeting thoughts about having sex with children so that comparison doesn't work
I don't think anybody does but at the same time I don't think many people collect it for the sole reason that it depicts children, I think for the majority the appeal is in breaking a taboo
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,972
Ohio tears are tasty.
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,973
@596,968 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
So how much thought of a crime makes non criminals hypocrites?
Your ideas about collecting porn is very naive and you likely feel this way because someone you know and like views such things.
So how much thought of a crime makes non criminals hypocrites?
Your ideas about collecting porn is very naive and you likely feel this way because someone you know and like views such things.
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,991
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #596,994
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,033
@596,973 (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
Paedophiles by their intrinsic nature want to molest children. Therefore it's hypocritical for one to demonise another for also wanting to do so or actually doing
@previous (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
No who's that
Paedophiles by their intrinsic nature want to molest children. Therefore it's hypocritical for one to demonise another for also wanting to do so or actually doing
@previous (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
No who's that
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,034
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
What? People who seek out lolicon want to see kids getting raped, there is no difference.
Sarah butts is a tranny pedohile who claimed that toddlercon isn't pedoish and the timing seems suspiciously coincidental.
What? People who seek out lolicon want to see kids getting raped, there is no difference.
Sarah butts is a tranny pedohile who claimed that toddlercon isn't pedoish and the timing seems suspiciously coincidental.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,041
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,044
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,045
@597,034 (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
You're the one who brought up lolicon? I'm talking about hater saying First Peoples should be actively blocked from having a say in matters because of child sexual abuse issues, which apparently makes them "absolute garbage" despite the fact he himself runs the danger of sexually abusing a child if given the chance! I'm calling it out because I think it's unethical to stereotype an entire race amongst these lines and it's pretty transparent that the problem is with their race not their supposed tendency to fuck kids if they get drunk.
And no I don't know this person and don't even have Twitter.
You're the one who brought up lolicon? I'm talking about hater saying First Peoples should be actively blocked from having a say in matters because of child sexual abuse issues, which apparently makes them "absolute garbage" despite the fact he himself runs the danger of sexually abusing a child if given the chance! I'm calling it out because I think it's unethical to stereotype an entire race amongst these lines and it's pretty transparent that the problem is with their race not their supposed tendency to fuck kids if they get drunk.
And no I don't know this person and don't even have Twitter.
kook !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,048
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
You have no idea if he runs the risk of committing a crime or not.
I brought up lolicon because you're okay with it even though people who view it want to see children being hurt.
You have no idea if he runs the risk of committing a crime or not.
I brought up lolicon because you're okay with it even though people who view it want to see children being hurt.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,052
@previous (kook !!Phkn/3Gic)
I disagree with the fundamental notion that a drawing, even a pornographic drawing of a child, should not be protected under free speech laws and I think that if we start banning artworks simply because the subject is distasteful, it opens the gates for abuse in the future.
I disagree with the fundamental notion that a drawing, even a pornographic drawing of a child, should not be protected under free speech laws and I think that if we start banning artworks simply because the subject is distasteful, it opens the gates for abuse in the future.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,105
@596,826 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
> And I don't know why you're getting on your high horse about native people raping kids when you are a fucking paedo, you're just as bad.
Wow. So much ignorance, so you support drunk child rapists over a child admirer? Goes to show, antis don't care about kids. As they prefer actual child rapists over ethical child admirers.
H
> And I don't know why you're getting on your high horse about native people raping kids when you are a fucking paedo, you're just as bad.
Wow. So much ignorance, so you support drunk child rapists over a child admirer? Goes to show, antis don't care about kids. As they prefer actual child rapists over ethical child admirers.
H
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,109
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,110
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
No one cares about the opinions of child rape apologists like yourself.
Are you a catholic? I get you're a catholic.
No one cares about the opinions of child rape apologists like yourself.
Are you a catholic? I get you're a catholic.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,112
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Tell me, would you wear protection whilst you, uh... "Admire" a child?
Tell me, would you wear protection whilst you, uh... "Admire" a child?
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,113
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,116
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,119
@previous (E)
Thats too young for that. I can't remember, did they ever find who did it?
If you really consider it, imagine the kind of person who would vaginally rape a 5 year old. They maintained an erection while literally tearing a little girl apart. That's something I cannot wrap my head around. Probably not a pedophile but a situational offender.
Thats too young for that. I can't remember, did they ever find who did it?
If you really consider it, imagine the kind of person who would vaginally rape a 5 year old. They maintained an erection while literally tearing a little girl apart. That's something I cannot wrap my head around. Probably not a pedophile but a situational offender.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #597,121
Anonymous J replied with this 11 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #597,840
Remember when mountains weren't a reason to sperg about pedos?