Topic: Iris is dead.
Metæ started this discussion 11 years ago #44,986 When AMD Zen hits the market. I think even Apple, one of Intel Iris graphics biggest fans, will be dancing on Iris' grave with an all new x86 core design, SMT, up to 40% more instructions per clock and very reasonable TDP.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9231/amds-20162017-x86-roadmap-zen-is-in brie !uXWPG0MygI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 2 minutes later[^] [v] #594,142 100,000/10
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 4 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #595,967 You clicked.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 26 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #595,987 Mocking someone's deceased loved one: Meta, you have stooped to a new low, even for you.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 31 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #595,999 @previous (D)
Whose loved one is a video card?!?!
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 11 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,079 @595,987 (D)
What? Is this some kind of inside joke? I for one, appreciate this type of tech thread.
Metæ (OP) replied with this 11 years ago , 14 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,081 @595,987 (D)
Your deceased loved one is... Intel graphics?!
Million Mong March joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 2 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,097 Blue Iris, the porn star too. Here's a great prank phone call with her voice clips:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBXbz8Kunss?t=0m12s Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 21 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,102 amd is worthless and they will continue to be dominated by intel forever
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago , 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,105 fantastic
Million Mong March replied with this 11 years ago , 28 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,124 Moore's law, the too-often cited suggestion that "transistor density will double every 18 to 24 months", is no longer descriptive of reality. Seriously, did people think that transisters would get smaller than Planck lengths? Single-thread clock speed hit a wall years ago too.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/07/intel-confirms-tick-tock-shattering-kaby-lake-processor-as-moores-law-falters/ Metæ (OP) replied with this 11 years ago , 16 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,134 But it was never a law. Gordon Moore just said "hey it looks like transistor density is doubling every couple years" back in the 60s and then everyone else made it a law.
Million Mong March replied with this 11 years ago , 6 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #596,139 @previous (Metæ )
well no shit, we always heard about "Moore's law" as if it was what it named, and that irked me
↕