Minichan

Topic: Petition to limit the amount of gay porn posted on MC

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #44,901

We don't want this place to go the way of scatchan, where literally every second post was gay porn.
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
No gay porn on MC 3 25%
Less gay porn on MC - 0%
More gay porn on MC 8 67%
Not sure 1 8%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 30 minutes later[^] [v] #592,869

Your joke would work better if gay porn was actually posted on Minichan.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #592,871

Write in; This thread triggers me.

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #592,882

@previous (C)
Please stop abusing semicolons. Thanks.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #592,885

@592,871 (C)
Does it really?

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 38 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #592,887

@592,882 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
I ;;;;;;;; agree;

(Edited 6 seconds later.)

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #592,932

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #592,942

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)

Now this does not trigger me. Thanks.

brie !uXWPG0MygI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #592,949

@previous (C)
but it is gay porn you mora

get a safety for your triggers bruh

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,073

@592,869 (B)

> Your joke would work better if gay porn was actually posted on Minichan.

What do you call this?

dw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,074

@previous (A)
funny

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,075

Externally hosted image@593,073 (A)
oh no a single post

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 57 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,086

@593,074 (dw)
@previous (I)
I here and now submit that we ban all gay porn featuring minichan users.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,087

@previous (A)
That seems homophobic.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,089

@593,075 (I)
How much gay porn do you have saved on your computer?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,093

@593,087 (dw)
No, I just don't think it's right to use straight men in gay porn shoops, especially when it could seriously damage their reputations in real life.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,094

@previous (A)
They're probably not that straight if they are in gay porn.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,095

@previous (dw)
Their images are being used without their consent.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,096

@previous (A)
Again, they should not have taken a job as a gay porn star if they did not want it to end up on the internet.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 36 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,107

@previous (dw)
The user in this gif has never worked in gay porn and his image is being used without his consent.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,110

@previous (A)
He obviously has, he's in an advertising banner for a gay porn film!

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,114

MEANWHILE, AT OP'S HOUSE....

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,116

@593,110 (dw)
Obviously he has not, that image is a poorly executed shoop. Thanks.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,127

@previous (A)
It fooled me! And probably any prospective employers and personal relations of the person in that advertisement as well.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,159

@previous (dw)
Which is why it should be banned. Thanks.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 40 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,198

@previous (A)
I think it is more likely that that person is a gay porn star than anything else. Do you really think someone on some anonymous internet forum was annoyed enough with a poster they made an intricate Photoshop out of him? You are being paranoid.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,242

@previous (dw)
> an intricate Photoshop

LOL no

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,245

@previous (A)
Haven't you seen it? It's a very intricate picture. Matt's whole face has been pasted on there. Do you realise how much work that would take? Getting his entire face put onto the image?

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,246

I personally think there isn't enough gay porn in the board mainframe

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,249

@593,245 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I've seen a lot of modified images, and created a lot too. It is my expert professional opinion that the image in question is, in fact, authentic.

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,256

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)

I know that it is authentic because I am the person getting bummed in the picture. I was desperate for money to Pay My Debts™, and can thus confirm that the unwashed sweaty penis in the picture belongs to Matthew R Miller of Kumning, China, who paid me 20k yuan in cash from a box marked "Falun Gong petty cash", on the lid of which was scrawled "Chinese Democracy Now! Free Tibet! Death to the Party!"

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #593,313

@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
I here and now submit that we ban all references to illegal political movements. Thanks.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,363

@previous (A)
This will never pass parliament.

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,372

@593,313 (A)

I agree! Since Falun Gong is an illegal religious movement however, it's exempt from such a law

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,600

@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
I here and now submit that we ban all references to illegal religious movements. Thanks.

@593,363 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
No act of parliament is required to delete material from this board. Thanks.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,601

@previous (A)

Why, that's exactly what an Anti-Chinese traitor would say!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,603

@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
That is not, in fact, what an anti-Chinese traitor would say. Thanks.

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,606

@previous (A)
Sup matt?

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,610

@593,603 (A)

If it is not, in fact, what an anti-Chinese traitor would say, then why, is an anti-Chinese traitor, saying it?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,618

@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
I am not, in fact, an anti-Chinese traitor. Thanks.

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,626

@previous (A)
Why, that's exactly what an Anti-Chinese traitor would say!

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,628

@593,618 (A)

> I am not, in fact, an anti-Chinese traitor. Thanks.

Does the Chinese government know about your affiliation with Falun Gong?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,629

@593,626 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
It is also, in fact, what a Chinese patriot would say. In B4 why, that's exactly what an Anti-Chinese traitor would say!

The Owl !KThEOwLwbU replied with this 11 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,641

@previous (A)
Why, that's exactly what an Anti-Chinese traitor would say!
ReportQuoteCite

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,695

@593,628 (C)
I am not, in fact, affiliated with any religious order. Thanks.

dw replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,708

@previous (A)
You started this thread talking in third person.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #593,776

@previous (dw)
Then Owl started to address me personally.

Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #594,737

@593,695 (A)
So Falun Gong is now a religious order??? You made plans with them to wipe out the Chinese government.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.