hater !JGlOo5d1iU started this discussion 11 years ago#44,562
here is a link to the story. I personally feel you cannot be charged for crimes people feel you intended to commit. How do we know it wasnt for roleplay or fantasy?
I think all charges tied to the possible cannabalism of children should be dropped. What do you feel fora?
kook !!b4KbSydQS joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later[^][v]#588,377
I think that he was set up by a vindictive ex girlfriend, because she's pissed that he's a pedo.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 22 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^][v]#588,380
@previous (kook !!b4KbSydQS)
Most women find young women and girls very threatening. Young girls have perfect skin, which adult women spend billions trying to emulate. It's rather odd. I believe you are wrong about the GF (does he looked like he's ever had one in his life?). They found him while investigating roleplay forums looking for an easy PR bust.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
kook !!b4KbSydQS replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#588,385
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Whats interesting is that you can apply this logic to many other types of crimes. Meth house, but no meth? Let them go. Bloody weapon and missing person? No body, let them go.
Also no more to catch a predator
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#588,386
@previous (kook !!b4KbSydQS)
To Catch a Predator relied on guilty pleas. No one who fought the charges even went to trial. All were dismissed before then.
He didn't have a bloody weapon, he had a fantasy roleplay dungeon. He was using chicken. It's pretty clear what went down.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
kook !!b4KbSydQS replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#588,390
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
What do you think went down?
Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#588,391
@588,386 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
I think he was practicing with the chicken to see how he would feel when the real thing happened. I think it is 99% certain that he planned to do this horrible crime.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#588,393
@previous (Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY)
Why? Because he fantasized about it and built a roleplay dungeon? Do you think Larpers are going to end up trying to take over the world through medieval warfare as well? I think you're only saying that because the guy looks like someone who would kidnap, rape, and eat children.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#588,394
@588,390 (kook !!b4KbSydQS)
From what I remember from the arrest, there were a few people and it seemed to be they posted on the same fetish site. I believed at the time it was just roleplay that incorporated aspects of their real life. The dude never tried to rape and eat a child. He had the dungeon built, he wouldn't have waited. Kids are easy to snatch. They're dumb, trusting, and physically weak.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#588,395
@588,393 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
I can see the LARPS argument. That is not why I think he is guilty. I am basing it on the supposed chatroom conversations where he and another guy were actually plotting to kidnap a church kid from a puppet show.