Topic: Is "Five Nights at Freddy's" good?
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #44,535
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes. | 3 | 30% | |
| No. | 6 | 60% | |
| Write In: Not Sure. | 1 | 10% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 34 seconds later[^] [v] #587,942
Yt;dw
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,944
No. It's an absolutely awful game with a retarded premise and basically no gameplay. No strategy or skill is involved, at least nothing besides reaction times. It's an absolute cancer and the only reason it's getting any attention whatsoever is because the game is simple enough for brain dead 5 years olds to play and get scared by.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,952
Obviously. It's been consistently popular, so it just be doing certain things very well to appeal to people as much as it has.
It's also getting a movie soon, which I think is pretty cool. It's using real animatronics, too.
It's also getting a movie soon, which I think is pretty cool. It's using real animatronics, too.
dw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,963
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,964
@587,952 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
lmfao, will it just be a guy sitting in a booth for 8 hours with broken physics (requiring power to keep a metal door down...) waiting to get jumpscared before he pressed a button? sounds like such a truly amazing concept.
lmfao, will it just be a guy sitting in a booth for 8 hours with broken physics (requiring power to keep a metal door down...) waiting to get jumpscared before he pressed a button? sounds like such a truly amazing concept.
Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,965
It is good, if you get into it. Not as good as Sad Satan though.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 45 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,967
Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,968
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #587,969
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #588,001
@587,964 (C)
No, the director said that there'll be different locations.
It's not just going to be a straight recreation of the games but as a movie, it's being adapted for the medium. But they're going to ensure it fits in with the game's story and general atmosphere.
No, the director said that there'll be different locations.
It's not just going to be a straight recreation of the games but as a movie, it's being adapted for the medium. But they're going to ensure it fits in with the game's story and general atmosphere.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #588,008
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
so it will be set in a world where gravity has the opposite effect on metal?
so it will be set in a world where gravity has the opposite effect on metal?
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #588,011
@previous (C)
Considering it'll also be set in a world where vengeful spirits are real, I think some artistic license on animatronic construction is acceptable.
Considering it'll also be set in a world where vengeful spirits are real, I think some artistic license on animatronic construction is acceptable.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #588,013
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
vengeful spirits can't melt steal beams, they require the doors to be open. doors that should be kept closed by gravity, but are somehow sucking up electricity. the fuck m8
vengeful spirits can't melt steal beams, they require the doors to be open. doors that should be kept closed by gravity, but are somehow sucking up electricity. the fuck m8
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,028
@previous (C)
Well, it's really just a way to tie the ability keep yourself safe to a depletable resource. I agree it doesn't make sense, but in the grand scheme of video games (which commonly include similarly impossible feats like double jumping or instantly healing yourself by walking over a med-kit), it's not all that bad.
The last three games didn't use doors that needed electricity to stay shut, anyway, so it's not really a complaint that applies to the majority of the series.
Well, it's really just a way to tie the ability keep yourself safe to a depletable resource. I agree it doesn't make sense, but in the grand scheme of video games (which commonly include similarly impossible feats like double jumping or instantly healing yourself by walking over a med-kit), it's not all that bad.
The last three games didn't use doors that needed electricity to stay shut, anyway, so it's not really a complaint that applies to the majority of the series.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,029
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
There's more than one of those games? Christ, it's like the worst of flash games but now you get to pay for them
There's more than one of those games? Christ, it's like the worst of flash games but now you get to pay for them
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,035
@previous (C)
There are four, yes. And they've all sold quite well, reportedly.
You know, I think you're conflating quality and what personally appeals to you. Yeah, the gameplay and graphics are quite simple, but having complex gameplay and good graphics are hardly the only measures of quality.
There are four, yes. And they've all sold quite well, reportedly.
You know, I think you're conflating quality and what personally appeals to you. Yeah, the gameplay and graphics are quite simple, but having complex gameplay and good graphics are hardly the only measures of quality.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,039
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,040
@588,035 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
No, I can appreciate things even if they don't personally appeal to me. "Five Nights at Freddy" however is just plain retarded for all the reasons I've already mentioned. It's a video game: gameplay matters and it basically has none. And it's being sold for money! The horrible shitty quality of this game makes me think back to early 2000s when free flash games were all the rage. This would have been one of those, and it's laughable people are willing to pay money for something like that.
No, I can appreciate things even if they don't personally appeal to me. "Five Nights at Freddy" however is just plain retarded for all the reasons I've already mentioned. It's a video game: gameplay matters and it basically has none. And it's being sold for money! The horrible shitty quality of this game makes me think back to early 2000s when free flash games were all the rage. This would have been one of those, and it's laughable people are willing to pay money for something like that.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,041
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,042
@previous (A)
That depends, does it include more than staring at the screen for some pixels to change and then occasionally clicking your right or left mouse button?
That depends, does it include more than staring at the screen for some pixels to change and then occasionally clicking your right or left mouse button?
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 56 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,070
@588,039 (A)
I didn't say it wasn't, I said that FNaF's more simplistic gameplay wasn't a detriment to its quality.
On the contrary, it's a strength. The game is easy to play but challenging to master, and the first person viewpoint served to better immerse you into things.
@588,040 (C)
No, I think you are conflating complexity with quality. Yeah the games are relatively simple, but there's more to them than that. They're challenging, and have a fairly compelling story to uncover if one pays attention.
I should also note, it isn't actually being sold for much money as games go. Compare the prices to a modern triple A game. Bit of a difference, right? And if people are willing to pay for the games, then why shouldn't the developer charge for them, exactly? He did put time and effort into making them (I know you'll deny this, but it's true).
@previous (C)
> occasionally
If you had more than a passing familiarity with the games, you'd know that it often requires quick reactions to multiple threats. It's hardly passive.
I didn't say it wasn't, I said that FNaF's more simplistic gameplay wasn't a detriment to its quality.
On the contrary, it's a strength. The game is easy to play but challenging to master, and the first person viewpoint served to better immerse you into things.
@588,040 (C)
No, I think you are conflating complexity with quality. Yeah the games are relatively simple, but there's more to them than that. They're challenging, and have a fairly compelling story to uncover if one pays attention.
I should also note, it isn't actually being sold for much money as games go. Compare the prices to a modern triple A game. Bit of a difference, right? And if people are willing to pay for the games, then why shouldn't the developer charge for them, exactly? He did put time and effort into making them (I know you'll deny this, but it's true).
@previous (C)
> occasionally
If you had more than a passing familiarity with the games, you'd know that it often requires quick reactions to multiple threats. It's hardly passive.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,075
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> If you had more than a passing familiarity with the games, you'd know that it often requires quick reactions to multiple threats. It's hardly passive.
I've tried to play the first game, but I could feel cancer growing in my brain as I attempted to do so, so I quickly gave up.
> I should also note, it isn't actually being sold for much money as games go. Compare the prices to a modern triple A game. Bit of a difference, right?
Yes, this is called being an indie developer.
> No, I think you are conflating complexity with quality. Yeah the games are relatively simple, but there's more to them than that. They're challenging, and have a fairly compelling story to uncover if one pays attention.
No. A good example of a game that is simple but fun is linerider. And guess what? It was one of those free flash games.
> If you had more than a passing familiarity with the games, you'd know that it often requires quick reactions to multiple threats. It's hardly passive.
I've tried to play the first game, but I could feel cancer growing in my brain as I attempted to do so, so I quickly gave up.
> I should also note, it isn't actually being sold for much money as games go. Compare the prices to a modern triple A game. Bit of a difference, right?
Yes, this is called being an indie developer.
> No, I think you are conflating complexity with quality. Yeah the games are relatively simple, but there's more to them than that. They're challenging, and have a fairly compelling story to uncover if one pays attention.
No. A good example of a game that is simple but fun is linerider. And guess what? It was one of those free flash games.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,083
@previous (C)
Conversely, many people tried the game and got hooked on it. Some (such as myself) don't play it, but still find it appealing. I am still unsure you are able to empathise with the many others who find the game compelling rather than just go with your own perception. Like, I'm not particularly interested 50 Shades of Grey, but I think I get why many people might find appeal in it.
Okay, so in regards to linerider, I'm not sure it's a valid comparison. You could probably find lots of fairly similar games in the iOS or Android stores, all being charged for. It's entirely up to the dev whether the content is charged for, there is no "obligation" to make it free if it's simple. If it's a mistake to charge for a game, then the sales will probably reflect that. But judging from the sales of FNaF, charging for it was a great idea and people are willing to pay for it.
Conversely, many people tried the game and got hooked on it. Some (such as myself) don't play it, but still find it appealing. I am still unsure you are able to empathise with the many others who find the game compelling rather than just go with your own perception. Like, I'm not particularly interested 50 Shades of Grey, but I think I get why many people might find appeal in it.
Okay, so in regards to linerider, I'm not sure it's a valid comparison. You could probably find lots of fairly similar games in the iOS or Android stores, all being charged for. It's entirely up to the dev whether the content is charged for, there is no "obligation" to make it free if it's simple. If it's a mistake to charge for a game, then the sales will probably reflect that. But judging from the sales of FNaF, charging for it was a great idea and people are willing to pay for it.
Harley !Quinn7Dxrw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,131
Its a great story, but the fan base can be fucking dumb.
If you stay away from the fans, it can be a fun game series.
If you stay away from the fans, it can be a fun game series.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,139
@588,083 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Right, those people I described as brain dead 5 year olds. Normally I have no issues empathizing with people who like things that I don't like, but not with these simpletons.
I just checked the android store, plenty of linerider clones. I've only seen free ones.
Right, those people I described as brain dead 5 year olds. Normally I have no issues empathizing with people who like things that I don't like, but not with these simpletons.
I just checked the android store, plenty of linerider clones. I've only seen free ones.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,142
@previous (C)
> brain dead five year olds
blatant straw man, and untrue. the game has a dedicated older following, not just young children. there's a very busy thread for it on 4chan's /vg/, for example.
> brain dead five year olds
blatant straw man, and untrue. the game has a dedicated older following, not just young children. there's a very busy thread for it on 4chan's /vg/, for example.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 28 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,143
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,144
@previous (C)Okay- so, to summarise:
- A game shouldn't be charged for if its gameplay doesn't meet some vague level of complexity
- Anyone who enjoys FNaF is immature or a retard
- FNaF's success isn't legitimate because of the first two points, so its commercial and cultural success counts for nothing at all
- People who are so unfamiliar with a game that they didn't know it had gotten three sequels are completely qualified to judge the worth of the series
Does this about cover things?
Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,145
I'm waiting for the Five Nights at Freddy Trims a Tree crossover.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 17 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,146
@588,144 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> - A game shouldn't be charged for if its gameplay doesn't meet some vague level of complexity
Putting words in my mouth. I'm sure you have some fancyshmancy term for this like straw man. All I said is that a game like this used to be a free crappy flash game and everyone recognized it as such. And now suddenly people are paying for this crap.
> - Anyone who enjoys FNaF is immature or a retard
Yes. Except I never called them retards. Just simpletons or brain dead five year olds.
> - FNaF's success isn't legitimate because of the first two points, so its commercial and cultural success counts for nothing at all
See the first sentence of point 1. Barbie is also popular and I view it like I do that.
> - People who are so unfamiliar with a game that they didn't know it had gotten three sequels are completely qualified to judge the worth of the series
See the first sentence of point 1. I only judged the first game.
Pay attention.
> - A game shouldn't be charged for if its gameplay doesn't meet some vague level of complexity
Putting words in my mouth. I'm sure you have some fancyshmancy term for this like straw man. All I said is that a game like this used to be a free crappy flash game and everyone recognized it as such. And now suddenly people are paying for this crap.
> - Anyone who enjoys FNaF is immature or a retard
Yes. Except I never called them retards. Just simpletons or brain dead five year olds.
> - FNaF's success isn't legitimate because of the first two points, so its commercial and cultural success counts for nothing at all
See the first sentence of point 1. Barbie is also popular and I view it like I do that.
> - People who are so unfamiliar with a game that they didn't know it had gotten three sequels are completely qualified to judge the worth of the series
See the first sentence of point 1. I only judged the first game.
Pay attention.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,157
@588,145 (Metæ)Clicking the wrong item would trigger jumpscares, I suppose.
In Freddy Trims a Tree, wasn't there a dog in the basement that fucking murders you if you don't do the right thing? That would, of course, become an animatronic.
@previous (C)
> I didn't say that simple games shouldn't be charged for, I just think it's ridiculous that people are paying for what I view as a simple game
> I didn't call them retards, but they are simpletons
> If I only briefly played the first game, then it's all that matters in judging the quality of a series
Oh, okay.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,161
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,162
Well Anon C is kind of a turkey.
I love all things horror and dont scare easily at all, yet the game makes me scream like a little girl. It is effective. They're definitely milking their success, but can't hate on them for being smart and making more money off of it.
Don't see why anyone would care that much to go out of their way and argue that it's a terrible game. "Stop liking what I don't like", pretty much. Kek.
I love all things horror and dont scare easily at all, yet the game makes me scream like a little girl. It is effective. They're definitely milking their success, but can't hate on them for being smart and making more money off of it.
Don't see why anyone would care that much to go out of their way and argue that it's a terrible game. "Stop liking what I don't like", pretty much. Kek.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,164
@588,161 (C)> I cannot accept something I do not like being so popular
@previous (I)
He's done milking it, apparently. FNaF 4 is supposedly the last one. But there is some DLC coming out for it on Halloween
And there's still a movie coming up, so that's pretty cool.
Anonymous I replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,166
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Well let's be real, the movie will probably be trash. Still totally gonna watch it, though. :D
Well let's be real, the movie will probably be trash. Still totally gonna watch it, though. :D
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,168
@588,162 (I)
Then you apparently have the mentality of a toddler. Have fun with that.
@588,164 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
No, I accept it being popular. With young children. It's adults that I wonder about what's wrong with them.
Then you apparently have the mentality of a toddler. Have fun with that.
@588,164 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
No, I accept it being popular. With young children. It's adults that I wonder about what's wrong with them.
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,169
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,171
@previous (Metæ)
That would require effort beyond lazily posting on the internet. So no, probably not.
That would require effort beyond lazily posting on the internet. So no, probably not.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,173
@588,166 (I)
I dunno... It's looking promising. Check out these comments by the director:
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2015/07/30/five-things-know-five-nights-freddys-movie
@588,168 (C)
Okay, I will try to sum up its appeal to non-children:
- challenging gameplay, with a mode called 20/20 that takes extreme skill to beat
- a surprisingly dark, complex plot that you have to work to uncover
- scary jumpscares and atmosphere
- nostalgia value. anyone who went to a Chuck E Cheese's as a kid and saw those animatronics will get more out of this
I dunno... It's looking promising. Check out these comments by the director:
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2015/07/30/five-things-know-five-nights-freddys-movie
@588,168 (C)
Okay, I will try to sum up its appeal to non-children:
- challenging gameplay, with a mode called 20/20 that takes extreme skill to beat
- a surprisingly dark, complex plot that you have to work to uncover
- scary jumpscares and atmosphere
- nostalgia value. anyone who went to a Chuck E Cheese's as a kid and saw those animatronics will get more out of this
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,175
@588,169 (Metæ)
No, Kimmo will do it first. Five Nights at Freddy's is CLEARLY an illegal clone of Freddy Trims a Tree.
No, Kimmo will do it first. Five Nights at Freddy's is CLEARLY an illegal clone of Freddy Trims a Tree.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,180
@588,173 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> - challenging gameplay, with a mode called 20/20 that takes extreme skill to beat
Does it require any skill than not pissing your pants in response to a jumpscare and reaction time?
> - a surprisingly dark, complex plot that you have to work to uncover
Alright, I can see the plot being dark and complex when metal doors can't stay down on the fucking floor by themselves.
> - challenging gameplay, with a mode called 20/20 that takes extreme skill to beat
Does it require any skill than not pissing your pants in response to a jumpscare and reaction time?
> - a surprisingly dark, complex plot that you have to work to uncover
Alright, I can see the plot being dark and complex when metal doors can't stay down on the fucking floor by themselves.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,187
@previous (C)
Yeah, it is challenging. You've got to keep track of several animatronics, and need quick reactions and good planning to stand a chance.
As for the plot, m8, you really shouldn't cast judgement without knowing what's going on:
In a nutshell, the animatronics are attacking because they're haunted by the spirits of some kids who were murdered by an employee at the pizzeria. And then you have to survive against the murderer (now trapped in an animatronic) in the third game. Also, it's implied that the fourth game is actually a nightmare while your character is in hospital after being bitten by an animatronic.
The smart thing is that very little of this is said outright. You need to pay close attention to the environment and the minigames to get the full story. This draws the player in, and has inspired a massive collaborative effort by the fandom to figure things out.
Yeah, it is challenging. You've got to keep track of several animatronics, and need quick reactions and good planning to stand a chance.
As for the plot, m8, you really shouldn't cast judgement without knowing what's going on:
In a nutshell, the animatronics are attacking because they're haunted by the spirits of some kids who were murdered by an employee at the pizzeria. And then you have to survive against the murderer (now trapped in an animatronic) in the third game. Also, it's implied that the fourth game is actually a nightmare while your character is in hospital after being bitten by an animatronic.
The smart thing is that very little of this is said outright. You need to pay close attention to the environment and the minigames to get the full story. This draws the player in, and has inspired a massive collaborative effort by the fandom to figure things out.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,188
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Alternative interpretation: There wasn't much of a plot to begin with. The game caught on (somehow) and the author saw dem $$$$ signals. He started cranking out more rehashed versions of the same game, creating the "plot" the fans had been speculating about.
Alternative interpretation: There wasn't much of a plot to begin with. The game caught on (somehow) and the author saw dem $$$$ signals. He started cranking out more rehashed versions of the same game, creating the "plot" the fans had been speculating about.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,190
@previous (C)
And you, as somebody who briefly played the first game before stopping, are clearly qualified to talk about the nature of the plot.
It was still dark and subtle in the first game. Minimal, admittedly, but it's kept to the same basic plot since the first one. The developer didn't just conjure up a plot once the first game became a hit.
And you, as somebody who briefly played the first game before stopping, are clearly qualified to talk about the nature of the plot.
It was still dark and subtle in the first game. Minimal, admittedly, but it's kept to the same basic plot since the first one. The developer didn't just conjure up a plot once the first game became a hit.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,191
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Right, I played the first game and there was no apparent plot. That's the point I'm making. Thank you for clarifying that for me.
Right, I played the first game and there was no apparent plot. That's the point I'm making. Thank you for clarifying that for me.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,193
@previous (C)
Okay then, can you tell me what led you to that conclusion?
Did you not notice the newspaper clippings?
Okay then, can you tell me what led you to that conclusion?
Did you not notice the newspaper clippings?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,194
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,203
@previous (C)
Yes it is. It is the game's story, ergo it is a plot.
What makes it more appealing is that it's hidden, and puts a whole new, and darker spin on the game's events. Unless you think that multiple children being murdered and stuffed into animatronics isn't dark or surprising, of course.
Yes it is. It is the game's story, ergo it is a plot.
What makes it more appealing is that it's hidden, and puts a whole new, and darker spin on the game's events. Unless you think that multiple children being murdered and stuffed into animatronics isn't dark or surprising, of course.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,213
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yes, it's a plot. Not much of one. Not a good one. But sure, it's a plot.
Yes, it's a plot. Not much of one. Not a good one. But sure, it's a plot.
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,220
@previous (C)
I think the key element you are missing is that, in the first game, if you look at the poster and click Freddy's nose, and amusing honk sound will be heard.
I will forgive this massive oversight on your part, and will accept your aplogies for omitting such a crucial detail in your analysis.
I think the key element you are missing is that, in the first game, if you look at the poster and click Freddy's nose, and amusing honk sound will be heard.
I will forgive this massive oversight on your part, and will accept your aplogies for omitting such a crucial detail in your analysis.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,221
kook !!b4KbSydQS joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 25 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,231
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,234
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 29 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,252
@previous (C)
Yes, anyone who holds an opinion that goes against your own is white knight, which is somehow relevant to a series of video games.
Yes, anyone who holds an opinion that goes against your own is white knight, which is somehow relevant to a series of video games.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,255
kook !!b4KbSydQS replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,257
@588,234 (C)
Regardless of your opinion of kl (yes he isnt manly) dont throw out dumb stuff like this. You cant whiteknight a game unless its sentient.
Regardless of your opinion of kl (yes he isnt manly) dont throw out dumb stuff like this. You cant whiteknight a game unless its sentient.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,259
@previous (kook !!b4KbSydQS)
If the fans of this abortion of a game were asked they'd probably say it's sentient.
If the fans of this abortion of a game were asked they'd probably say it's sentient.
kook !!b4KbSydQS replied with this 11 years ago, 35 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,260
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,263
@588,257 (kook !!b4KbSydQS)
I am not sure that my opinion on some video games has much to do with my manliness, buspuppie.
@588,259 (C)
i guess youre a fucking retard or someone with downs or something because that made no sense at all
I am not sure that my opinion on some video games has much to do with my manliness, buspuppie.
@588,259 (C)
i guess youre a fucking retard or someone with downs or something because that made no sense at all
kook !!b4KbSydQS replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,266
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,270
@588,263 (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
did your mother drop you on the head when you were a child or something? or did you just like to play with forks and electrical outlets as a kid
did your mother drop you on the head when you were a child or something? or did you just like to play with forks and electrical outlets as a kid
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,271
@previous (C)
tell me, just how retarded are you? did you have to go to the retard classes in school? do you have to wear special retard gloves and a special retard helmet so you don't injure yourself? exactly what magnitude of retardation am i seeing, here?
tell me, just how retarded are you? did you have to go to the retard classes in school? do you have to wear special retard gloves and a special retard helmet so you don't injure yourself? exactly what magnitude of retardation am i seeing, here?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,272
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,275
@previous (C)
no, i'm looking at a monitor. on it, i see someone of such base intelligence that their mind may represent an evolutionary link between the brain of an ape and the brain of a normal human.
you should be proud, you retardation could be of interest to evolutionary scientists. it's certainly not of interest to your struggling parents, i'd imagine.
no, i'm looking at a monitor. on it, i see someone of such base intelligence that their mind may represent an evolutionary link between the brain of an ape and the brain of a normal human.
you should be proud, you retardation could be of interest to evolutionary scientists. it's certainly not of interest to your struggling parents, i'd imagine.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,276
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
your brain turned all those little letters into that image? stop projecting and get your brain checked you delusional retard
your brain turned all those little letters into that image? stop projecting and get your brain checked you delusional retard
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,277
@previous (C)
i did not post an image, moron.
so you suffer from hallucinations as well as crippling retardation? fuck, you really drew the short stew when you were born, huh?
i did not post an image, moron.
so you suffer from hallucinations as well as crippling retardation? fuck, you really drew the short stew when you were born, huh?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 46 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,278
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
the image in your brainz dude come on
the image in your brainz dude come on
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,279
@previous (C)
oh wow , abstract thought. for a retard like you, that must be exhausting! take a nap in your hugbox, buddy. you've earned it.
oh wow , abstract thought. for a retard like you, that must be exhausting! take a nap in your hugbox, buddy. you've earned it.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,280
@previous (killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
coming from someone who didn't even grasp the concept to begin with, hah
coming from someone who didn't even grasp the concept to begin with, hah
killer lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,281
@previous (C)Okay, I don't enjoy being mean for an extended period. I like you really, and even though we strongly disagreed, I enjoyed our debate.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,282
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,283
Five Nights at Freddie's is better.hater !JGlOo5d1iU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,372
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
Do you have to avoid getting aids? Most of minichan would lose in the first few seconds.
Do you have to avoid getting aids? Most of minichan would lose in the first few seconds.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #588,452
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
You're in a concert arena and you have to keep checking the CCTV for various Freddies like the transvestite one from I Want to Break Free.
You're in a concert arena and you have to keep checking the CCTV for various Freddies like the transvestite one from I Want to Break Free.