Minichan

Topic: Anyone watching the Repug debate?

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q started this discussion 11 years ago #44,424

lol, Rand Paul lost his mind right off the bat.

Now they're on Donald Trump about misogyny.

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #586,673

Fox News Channel btw.

He explains that the problem is political correctness. That's why it's okay for a presidential candidate to call women fat pigs who would look better on their knees.

Murica!

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) triple-posted this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #586,674

Mike Huckabee just explained that the President can revoke the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. To stop abortion. Yup.

Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #586,676

No, I don't care for Republicans. Rand Paul is a degenerate neocon sellout and a disgrace to his father's political legacy.

beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #586,679

@previous (Metæ)
Lol. How so?

Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 19 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #586,683

@OP

> lol, Rand Paul lost his mind right off the bat.
>
> Now they're on Donald Trump about misogyny.

Actually er did you miss Trump, Sperging right from the start when he refused to raise his hand on the very first question - Then got massive number of booooos

However agree Ron Paul has in the first hour fared not so much so well.

(Edited 25 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #586,703

FUCK how could i miss that, its fun to see people trying to kill each other with words but still try and be civilized at the same time.

whore's back riding joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #586,704

hey sweet, sounds like it provided much comic entertainment

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #586,706

im going to punch the next person i hear irl say "i like trump!! he doesn't have a filter!!"

this country is totally fucked no matter who wins, we've had it good until now.

Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #586,708

@586,679 (beckyderp !4aMoRa.T2Q)
He's trying to be hawkish on Iran which is stupid because the Bush-McCain-Graham neocon wing of the party will never accept him, and because it alienates libertarians so he ends up with the support of neither. It's a damn shame too because Rand could have made the party a lot more attractive to young people, with drug legalization and laissez-faire social policy and entrepreneurs with laissez-faire capitalism. People are fucking tired of America playing world policeman, and endless wars in the Middle East.

(Edited 48 seconds later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #586,709

@586,706 (F)

So even if hillary wins and ends the war on women it won't matter because women will still be fucked?

hater !JGlOo5d1iU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 23 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #587,114

@586,708 (Metæ)
rand isn't a libertarian, and Ron Paul wasnt a libertarian savior. He was an economic libertarian and only social libertarian concerning weed and civil rights. Dude was a fucking idiot who only got support from loonies and uninformed ignorant young people.

I did read a few things from rand Paul they made me hopeful until I went to his campaign site and saw how fucking dumb he is.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

hater !JGlOo5d1iU double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #587,116

There's no chance any of this idiots will win. The Republican Party is unable to field a candidate that appeals to their base and the public at large. It's become impossible. The 2008 election demonstrated that. It's over without party reinvention.

Methlyfe joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #587,118

I can't believe I missed this. :(

brie joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #587,119

@587,116 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Green Party 2016?

brie double-posted this 11 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #587,120

@587,118 (Methlyfe)

> I can't believe I missed this. :(

hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #587,124

@587,119 (brie)
Third party candidates are a joke. It's a two party system. They would get nothing done, also, they would never get elected as things are. The best they can do is split the vote for one side, so they're really a terrible option.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.