Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later[^][v]#78,662
The issue is what?
Smegma !faggot joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,663
The headline reads like something from Onion News.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,664
@78,662 (B)
It looks like this poor student killed himself when he realized where this country is headed. Why bother graduating, and trying to have the Anerican dream when this man will just steal it all away from you?
Smegma !faggot replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,666
Attributing an incident to only one thing is a logical fallacy.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,670
At present, daytime /a/ is more intelligent than MC.
Feels bad man.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,672
@78,666 (Smegma !faggot)
No, it's not. When that thing causes the incident, then logic will lead you to attribute that thing to be the cause of the incident.
Smegma !faggot replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,675
In this case you're wrong because you don't know why he killed himself.
You can't make assumptions based on practically no evidence then call it logic.
Nothing in that article indicates why he killed himself.
I could posit an equally ludacris scenario based on what I just read: The kid who committed suicide had done so because Lady Gaga threatened to come to his house and devour his penis with ketchup if he didn't pay her 5 million dollars. There's absolutely no evidence to support your claim or mine.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#78,678
Yeah, the people around here usually only post mature and intelligent topics/replies.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#78,687
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
I mean more stupid than usual.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#78,858
@78,675 (Smegma !faggot)
Whether or not I am right, the statement: > Attributing an incident to only one thing is a logical fallacy.
is wrong. Attributing an incident to only one thing is not fallacious. Perhaps in this case I am wrong about the motive for the suicide, but let's look at the next case: > The boy kicked the ball. The ball flew because of the kick.
I attribute the ball flying to one thing: the kick. Is that fallacious? No.
Fallacies are fallacies, even if they come to the right conclucions. Non fallacioius arguments can exist alongside fallacious ones.
Come back when you know what a fallacy is.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#78,865