Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,273
@581,271 (RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx)
Can you elaborate?
RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 second later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,274
@581,272 (A)
Legal classification is more relevant to most people's lives than sexual classification. Leo Vegas, therefore, are properly classified as a pedo.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 34 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,275
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx)
Pedo isn't a legal classification, and shouldn't be used in that context.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,276
@581,273 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
I'd rather not, I don't really feel it's my place to do that.
Suffice to say, there were some interactions that the law would frown upon.
RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 11 years ago, 49 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,277
@581,275 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
hater didn't recognise that I was using a dank meme, and should be ashamed in this context.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,278
@581,276 (RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx)
What? There is no reason to protect criminals from exposure, you should feel free to expose his crimes.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,279
I wouldn't mind. Tell him I welcome his return!
RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,280
@581,278 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
That's not the reason.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,281
ITT: Matthew Rosteet Miller of Kunming, China, defending pedophilia once again.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,282
@581,280 (RWBY Rhubarb !!iNo3FkiZx)
Is it to protect his "victim" ??
hater !JGlOo5d1iU double-posted this 11 years ago, 47 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,283
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 46 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,285
@581,282 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
jeez you must be out of the loop, everyone knows it was Triptych and that Leo taught her about the moon.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,286
@581,281 (B)
It was not pedophilia. It was hebephilia, which is also illegal. And I am not defending it, idiot. I am passing along a message, nothing more.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,289
@581,285 (E)
Did it happen almost 3 years ago? I have a vague recollection.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 37 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,290
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
I thought you were new here?
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#581,295
@previous (A)
No. Newish. I haven't been here in years.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#581,300
@581,278 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
There are actually plenty of reasons to do so. One of which might be that the "criminal" is not actually a criminal. I'm talking generally, though. Pedo Vegas is an absolutely terrible human being.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#581,301
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#581,302
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
As hearsay has it: Soliciting an underage woman for sex, then drugging and raping her.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#581,304
@previous (F)
No. Noooo. I hope that isn't true. That actually made my stomach feel sick. I hope you are trolling me.
Edit: wait, if she was already solicited for sex, where did the drugging come in? Do you mean provided drugs the underage woman was willingly taking, and then hybrape, do you mean statutory?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#581,307
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
I'm not trolling, sadly. I wish I was. I also don't know the full details obviously, but drugs were involved somehow. I also am not sure what you mean with hybrape, but I assume it's some pedo term to make rape seem less awful.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 53 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#581,311
@previous (F)
Should be "by rape," as I was trying to ascertain if he went full Cosby.
Doing drugs with someone is far less shit baggy than drugging someone and then pulling a Cosby. It's like a lot worse to me than sharing drugs and then having relations with someone who is not 18. Both are bad, but it's like killing someone who's an asshole in cold blood, and murdering a child.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#581,321
Only if he can beat Matt in a drinking contest to the death. Whoever lives gets to post again.
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#581,325
I don't really care one way or the other but if he does he will get a lot of abuse so why did he even ask
Does it not make more sense to just post anon (which he probably already does) or start with a different nickname
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 15 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#581,648
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
No. I want to see him get abused. Cosby got away with it! Never again!
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#581,650