Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#579,783
In the original printing of Alpha, the card Volcanic Island was left out, leaving the cycle of dual lands incomplete. This was fixed in the second printing, "Beta". This was just one of many errors in the original printing of the first Magic: the Gathering set.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#579,785
I got a cheque for £26.20 from HMRC the other day for overpaid taxes
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#579,787
I have to pay around 500 euro for underpaid taxes.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#579,789
The power armour of the Sisters of Battle is, in fact, just as protective as Space Marine power armour. However, as Battle Sisters lack the black carapace, they cannot fully interface with their power armour as Astartes can. This fact is mentioned in the 3rd edition Witch Hunters codex.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#580,085
The Moser experiment is premised on the fact that there are two distinct reactions to mistakes, both of which can be reliably detected using electroenchephalography, or EEG. The first reaction is called error-related negativity (ERN). It appears about 50 milliseconds after a screw-up and is believed to originate in the anterior cingulate cortex, a chunk of tissue that helps monitor behavior, anticipate rewards and regulate attention. This neural reaction is mostly involuntary, the inevitable response to any screw-up.
The second signal, which is known as error positivity (Pe), arrives anywhere between 100-500 milliseconds after the mistake and is associated with awareness. It occurs when we pay attention to the error, dwelling on the disappointing result. In recent years, numerous studies have shown that subjects learn more effectively when their brains demonstrate two properties: 1) a larger ERN signal, suggesting a bigger initial response to the mistake and 2) a more consistent Pe signal, which means that they are probably paying attention to the error, and thus trying to learn from it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#580,184