Topic: Man faces 6 months in jail for disagreeing with feminists on twitter
hater !JGlOo5d1iU started this discussion 11 years ago #43,856
here is the video describing it.
Holy fuck. I don't know anymore to this story, but this is insane. Anyone know more? I imagine there has to be more to the story, as what the women were doing would constitute harassment far more than simply disagreeing with someone.
Holy fuck. I don't know anymore to this story, but this is insane. Anyone know more? I imagine there has to be more to the story, as what the women were doing would constitute harassment far more than simply disagreeing with someone.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #579,178
I'm looking things up now, but from what I've seen, this is crazy as hell! Why was such a claim allowed to go that far in court?
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,180
can anyone tl;dr this?
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,181
@previous (squeegee)
A while back, a man made a video game about punching Anita Sarkissian. People were trying to dox him, and shit.
So this Canadian guy was discussing with feminists the idea that someone making a video game like that didnt deserve to have their life ruined. Well that started a war between the Canadian guy and the feminists. They were saying things to each other back and forth, and he started tagging them in pictures. Though from what I've read, he said nothing violent. But the women did make threats.
A while back, a man made a video game about punching Anita Sarkissian. People were trying to dox him, and shit.
So this Canadian guy was discussing with feminists the idea that someone making a video game like that didnt deserve to have their life ruined. Well that started a war between the Canadian guy and the feminists. They were saying things to each other back and forth, and he started tagging them in pictures. Though from what I've read, he said nothing violent. But the women did make threats.
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,183
I was punching Bill Gates on the internet in the 1990s. It's a thing you do on the internet.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 25 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,184
@579,181 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
He was very persistent in criticizing them, but they also set out to gang up on him. It's completely hypocritical behavior.
Entitled female hysteria. It's a shame it's no longer recognized as the serious mental illness it is. It causes SJWism. It's even contagious as some men have caught it.
He was very persistent in criticizing them, but they also set out to gang up on him. It's completely hypocritical behavior.
Entitled female hysteria. It's a shame it's no longer recognized as the serious mental illness it is. It causes SJWism. It's even contagious as some men have caught it.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,185
@579,183 (D)
Yes, but feminists have created a mythological epidemic of violence against women. Since they don't empathize with men, they completely ignore that men are more often the victims of violence, and acts of violence against men are dismissed as not important.
Yes, but feminists have created a mythological epidemic of violence against women. Since they don't empathize with men, they completely ignore that men are more often the victims of violence, and acts of violence against men are dismissed as not important.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,188
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
And when was the last time a woman broke your eye-socket for back answering her?
And when was the last time a woman broke your eye-socket for back answering her?
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,192
@previous (E)
I was in an abusive relationship when I was in high school. She never physically hurt me because women are inferior physiologically, and they know that. Still, I've seen women become physical with men. I've seen women get men to attack other men.
What's your point? None of that is relevant to make victims of violence, some of whom are victimized directly by women.
Lesbian relationships have the highest rates of abuse. Women aren't innocent angels. Nor does it matter that some women choose to be with violent men.
I was in an abusive relationship when I was in high school. She never physically hurt me because women are inferior physiologically, and they know that. Still, I've seen women become physical with men. I've seen women get men to attack other men.
What's your point? None of that is relevant to make victims of violence, some of whom are victimized directly by women.
Lesbian relationships have the highest rates of abuse. Women aren't innocent angels. Nor does it matter that some women choose to be with violent men.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,193
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,194
@579,188 (E)
Over the Internet? No one is giving anyone black eyes over the Internet. It's not like there is actual violence in this case. (If he is actually assaulting women, then he should stand and face the punishment for doing so. But this doesn't seem to be the case here.) Would you get bent out of shape if some guy continually disagreed with you on the Internet and then feel like that's assault? (I mean, I'd love to see you run mountainman into debt in some Australian court...) It's bullshit unless you are willing to say that having an opinion is a crime.
Over the Internet? No one is giving anyone black eyes over the Internet. It's not like there is actual violence in this case. (If he is actually assaulting women, then he should stand and face the punishment for doing so. But this doesn't seem to be the case here.) Would you get bent out of shape if some guy continually disagreed with you on the Internet and then feel like that's assault? (I mean, I'd love to see you run mountainman into debt in some Australian court...) It's bullshit unless you are willing to say that having an opinion is a crime.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 46 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #579,195
@579,181 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
thanks
@579,188 (E)
i've been the victim of violence at the hands of both men and women. because i'm not a sexist.
thanks
@579,188 (E)
i've been the victim of violence at the hands of both men and women. because i'm not a sexist.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,199
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,204
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)No, Buspuppie (AKA Kook, Swamplights, totoforhire, maybesomeothernamesimmissing) drove him off. I can't say I miss him.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,205
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,206
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2NkjNvwuaU
Same user uploaded a video where Obama accidentally says they are training isil.
Same user uploaded a video where Obama accidentally says they are training isil.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,207
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,208
@579,199 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Wouldn't be surprised if he killed himself.
@579,204 (G)
One more reason to like kook.
@579,205 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
And good riddance.
Wouldn't be surprised if he killed himself.
@579,204 (G)
One more reason to like kook.
@579,205 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
And good riddance.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,209
@579,205 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Yeah, I don't know. He did seem to be. And I'm pretty sure he was in seminary by the arguments he fielded. And there was that Hello Kitty telephone thing.
Yeah, I don't know. He did seem to be. And I'm pretty sure he was in seminary by the arguments he fielded. And there was that Hello Kitty telephone thing.
Anonymous G double-posted this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,211
@579,208 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> One more reason to like kook.
Seriously BP is one of my favorite MC people. (Becky, KL, r04r, sometimes Meta... your're all on the short list as well...)
> One more reason to like kook.
Seriously BP is one of my favorite MC people. (Becky, KL, r04r, sometimes Meta... your're all on the short list as well...)
Anonymous G triple-posted this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,212
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,213
@579,211 (G)
My favorites recently have been squeegee and hater. Squeegee is a smart guy who seems to be right about just about everything and I like hater's attitude.
My favorites recently have been squeegee and hater. Squeegee is a smart guy who seems to be right about just about everything and I like hater's attitude.
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,214
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,215
@579,192 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
The point is that you're unlikely to ever suffer a beating from a woman, because - as you pointed out - women are, on average, physically smaller than men. On the other hand, the girls you went to high school with have likely experienced some degree of domestic violence in their lives for precisely the same reason.
> Lesbian relationships have the highest rates of abuse.
There are no reliable statistics available to verify that statement. The general consensus amongst researchers is that domestic violence between lesbian couples is equivalent to that between heterosexual couples. The difference lies in the amount of damage a male is capable of inflicting on a female partner.
The point is that you're unlikely to ever suffer a beating from a woman, because - as you pointed out - women are, on average, physically smaller than men. On the other hand, the girls you went to high school with have likely experienced some degree of domestic violence in their lives for precisely the same reason.
> Lesbian relationships have the highest rates of abuse.
There are no reliable statistics available to verify that statement. The general consensus amongst researchers is that domestic violence between lesbian couples is equivalent to that between heterosexual couples. The difference lies in the amount of damage a male is capable of inflicting on a female partner.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,217
@previous (E)
Men are still overwhelmingly the victims of violence. They're overwhelmingly the victims of murder. Women being weak changes nothing. They're less likely to be victims of violence, period.
Men are still overwhelmingly the victims of violence. They're overwhelmingly the victims of murder. Women being weak changes nothing. They're less likely to be victims of violence, period.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,218
@579,213 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Squeegee seems like a square guy. I like him.
@579,214 (H)
I wonder if MM has spread the word of minichan.org at all. It's not like he looks particularly good in any of these threads.
Squeegee seems like a square guy. I like him.
@579,214 (H)
I wonder if MM has spread the word of minichan.org at all. It's not like he looks particularly good in any of these threads.
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,222
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,225
@previous (H)
Has Minichan's prodigal son come back to make No True Scotsman arguments again?? I'm not getting my hopes up. You don't sound particularly contradictory.
Has Minichan's prodigal son come back to make No True Scotsman arguments again?? I'm not getting my hopes up. You don't sound particularly contradictory.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,226
@579,217 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
And who is most likely to physically assault you: a male or a female?
@579,195 (squeegee)
> i've been the victim of violence at the hands of both men and women.
Did the women break any of your bones?
And who is most likely to physically assault you: a male or a female?
@579,195 (squeegee)
> i've been the victim of violence at the hands of both men and women.
Did the women break any of your bones?
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago, 22 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,227
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,228
@579,215 (E)
Domestic violence is always damaging. Your a fool if you think domestic violence boils up to who is stronger, no it boils up to who is more violent.
Domestic violence is always damaging. Your a fool if you think domestic violence boils up to who is stronger, no it boils up to who is more violent.
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,234
@previous (J)
How about "it all boils down to who is stronger and more violent?"
How about "it all boils down to who is stronger and more violent?"
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,235
Anonymous E replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,238
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Why can't you "de-escalate" a situation with a woman? There's no data to suggest that women are less rational than men; in point of fact, most studies indicate that men have greater impulse control problems due to their testosterone levels.
Why can't you "de-escalate" a situation with a woman? There's no data to suggest that women are less rational than men; in point of fact, most studies indicate that men have greater impulse control problems due to their testosterone levels.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,239
@579,227 (H)
Well, that is kind of triggering.
@579,228 (J)
I have this fantasy about dating Ronda Rousey, and then I think it's a bad idea.
Well, that is kind of triggering.
@579,228 (J)
I have this fantasy about dating Ronda Rousey, and then I think it's a bad idea.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #579,242
@579,234 (E)
Nha, a person may be strong but non violent. In other words, it boils down to which partner is the abusive partner. If it was just a matter of who knows kungfu or who has a gun, then its easy to imagine a utopia where everybody knows kungfu and have a gun which therefor creates world peace and perfect equality. Its not that way, its who dares to use violence and who is a person who does not use violence.
Nha, a person may be strong but non violent. In other words, it boils down to which partner is the abusive partner. If it was just a matter of who knows kungfu or who has a gun, then its easy to imagine a utopia where everybody knows kungfu and have a gun which therefor creates world peace and perfect equality. Its not that way, its who dares to use violence and who is a person who does not use violence.
Anonymous H replied with this 11 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #579,247
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #579,249
I'd expect that kind of stuff from Australia, but really Canada? What is this all aboot?
hater !JGlOo5d1iU (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 48 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #579,258
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #579,315
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #579,319
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #579,457
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #579,632
"Bitch hit me first." -- Ernest Rutherford, inventor of the proton