Topic: Why do FtM trannies seem to integrate into society so well where as...
Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #43,675
MtF trannies cause so many problems and make so much noise? Is it because FtM become part of the patriarchy or MtF were once part of the patriarchy so continue to fuck shit up?
Men seem to be the worlds greatest trolls. You have feminism then men literally spin it around and make it about them by transitioning and so making trans the most oppressed so real women can not talk over them.
Men seem to be the worlds greatest trolls. You have feminism then men literally spin it around and make it about them by transitioning and so making trans the most oppressed so real women can not talk over them.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 34 minutes later[^] [v] #576,982
Yep lol men now run feminism. But thats what the movement deserves frankly.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #576,986
Because it's okay for women to dress like men and nobody cares if a woman wants to hang out with boys.
But lots of foreveralone neckbeards arbitrarily decide that they are women because women don't flock to have sex with them so they just want to look in the mirror and masturbate to their own boobs. Also because they don't actually have any idea how women act so they emulate television stereotypes which tend to portray women as overdramatic and shallow. (Of course, they don't actually have to pretend to be shallow.)
But lots of foreveralone neckbeards arbitrarily decide that they are women because women don't flock to have sex with them so they just want to look in the mirror and masturbate to their own boobs. Also because they don't actually have any idea how women act so they emulate television stereotypes which tend to portray women as overdramatic and shallow. (Of course, they don't actually have to pretend to be shallow.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #576,987
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #576,992
bros before hos, lol i don't know
Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #576,996
It seems to be easier to masculinize than to feminize, physically. If you give a woman testosterone, she'll grow a beard, her voice will drop and she'll put on muscle. If you give a man estrogen he might grow some misshapen A-cups but he'll still have a beard, male body shape, deep voice, baldness, etc.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,001
@OP
Because women hate them because women hate other women they see as competition, as well as confused homophobia.
@576,982 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> Yep lol men now run feminism. But thats what the movement deserves frankly.
What? That's not true at all. The only men involved pander to women for blog hits and because they think it will get them laid (and it does, that dude who went around talking about how relationships between older men and younger women were essentially rape was fucking his students).
Because women hate them because women hate other women they see as competition, as well as confused homophobia.
@576,982 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> Yep lol men now run feminism. But thats what the movement deserves frankly.
What? That's not true at all. The only men involved pander to women for blog hits and because they think it will get them laid (and it does, that dude who went around talking about how relationships between older men and younger women were essentially rape was fucking his students).
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,004
@previous (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
BY men I meant transwomen/biomales. And yes, most lesbian/feminist clubs, websites, organizations, pride marches, are run by biomales. Because men dont act like women (even if they "feel" like women) and so take up leadership positions more readily.
BY men I meant transwomen/biomales. And yes, most lesbian/feminist clubs, websites, organizations, pride marches, are run by biomales. Because men dont act like women (even if they "feel" like women) and so take up leadership positions more readily.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,017
@576,982 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> being this obsessed with sjws, trannies, and feminists
See a therapist.
> being this obsessed with sjws, trannies, and feminists
See a therapist.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,018
@577,004 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
So that's why you hate feminism? You saw a dude in charge? Wow, that's sexist.
Or maybe I'm just forcing a position on you, either way, that would be sexist.
I mean, feminism helps men and women, after all, lol. Do feminists still spout that BS? Like vilifying men and male sexuality helps men in any way.
So that's why you hate feminism? You saw a dude in charge? Wow, that's sexist.
Or maybe I'm just forcing a position on you, either way, that would be sexist.
I mean, feminism helps men and women, after all, lol. Do feminists still spout that BS? Like vilifying men and male sexuality helps men in any way.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,024
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,026
@577,018 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
What really makes me hate feminism is trigger warnings, and stupid ass pronouns, and most of all, the unapologetic hate for straight males.
The whole men running feminism thing both annoys me, and amuses me.
What really makes me hate feminism is trigger warnings, and stupid ass pronouns, and most of all, the unapologetic hate for straight males.
The whole men running feminism thing both annoys me, and amuses me.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,035
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Oh, you're a far more rational and objective person than I, then. I don't like feminism mostly because I got called a misogynist by feminists who I considered my people.
It really really hurt my feelings. It felt like I got kicked out of a club and honestly sent me into a bit of a deep depression, so I decided to embrace misogyny. It's fun sometimes.
Why did they call me a misogynist? Cause I argued that a campaign to call for a dude to resign from a position he held for answering the question "why aren't there more women in the stem field" with a rational and reasonable response, despite it possibly being wrong, when the topic was not his expertise and he was answering off the cuff, was not appropriate or helpful.
The dude said he guessed, and he even qualified that he wasn't the best person to ask, that it was because of a lack of interest, and he mentioned the lack of women in his upper level courses.
Oh, you're a far more rational and objective person than I, then. I don't like feminism mostly because I got called a misogynist by feminists who I considered my people.
It really really hurt my feelings. It felt like I got kicked out of a club and honestly sent me into a bit of a deep depression, so I decided to embrace misogyny. It's fun sometimes.
Why did they call me a misogynist? Cause I argued that a campaign to call for a dude to resign from a position he held for answering the question "why aren't there more women in the stem field" with a rational and reasonable response, despite it possibly being wrong, when the topic was not his expertise and he was answering off the cuff, was not appropriate or helpful.
The dude said he guessed, and he even qualified that he wasn't the best person to ask, that it was because of a lack of interest, and he mentioned the lack of women in his upper level courses.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,045
@577,004 (kook !!mCVqftDha)It's like feminism invited it though. Feminists got involved in the LGBT movment and at one point were sort of leading it for their own gain, MtFs just naturally gravatated to feminism as a result and now we're in the era or social justice and oppression olympics those trans again natually gravatated to the top of the feminist food chain.
It's been one self infliced wound, feminism and LGBT should have stayed seprate movments. It's funny when you hear about modarate feminists in despair over their movment and they wonder why normal guys don't take them seriously.
You know that fat old Dworking feminist... She apprantly wrote a book hating on transwomen which has caused some awkward shifting among the more lefty SRS type of feminists and SJWs
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 31 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,047
@577,035 (hater !JGlOo5d1iU)
Can you please tell me more about your group? Ages, races, sex, etc?
I felt bad for that guy.
Can you please tell me more about your group? Ages, races, sex, etc?
I felt bad for that guy.
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,049
@577,045 (A)
I completely agree with this. But I also think that The T shouldnt have been invited in.
I completely agree with this. But I also think that The T shouldnt have been invited in.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,051
@577,047 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
It was an online community, many young college girls (I refuse to call anyone under 25 a woman or man) and a diverse mix of older white knights and fat obese lesbians with neon hair (not a joke, they were all stereotypes once I was able to step away, I like to think I wasnt a white knight, but maybe I was?)
It was an online community, many young college girls (I refuse to call anyone under 25 a woman or man) and a diverse mix of older white knights and fat obese lesbians with neon hair (not a joke, they were all stereotypes once I was able to step away, I like to think I wasnt a white knight, but maybe I was?)
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,055
@577,026 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
> men running feminism
Is it real? Which feminist groups are run by males? I only looked up NOW because thats the only feminist group I know and it seems to be female-run. It would be strange because it seems only the lamest men become feminists. And if they can take over something supposed to be all about women then... I just dont even know what to say.
> men running feminism
Is it real? Which feminist groups are run by males? I only looked up NOW because thats the only feminist group I know and it seems to be female-run. It would be strange because it seems only the lamest men become feminists. And if they can take over something supposed to be all about women then... I just dont even know what to say.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,057
kook !!mCVqftDha double-posted this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,060
@577,055 (Metæ)
Trans women I meant, and you have to really look to find them because they list themselves as women.
I'll look around a while and find you some examples.
Trans women I meant, and you have to really look to find them because they list themselves as women.
I'll look around a while and find you some examples.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,061
@577,057 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Around two years, it wasn't primarily a feminist community but became one. Joined for the secular humanism.
Around two years, it wasn't primarily a feminist community but became one. Joined for the secular humanism.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,065
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,070
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Noooo, I got shit on on there and never went back cause I believed I was too stupid to discuss things with them. I really believed I was too dumb cause I couldn't understand positions they held (and everyone seemed to disagree with me). It wasnt until later I realized they're just a big hysterical circle jerk.
They had a rule where you had to be "informed" to post, which meant if you didn't already accept positions they held, you couldn't post in some areas. Lol. I can't believe I got suckered by them.
Noooo, I got shit on on there and never went back cause I believed I was too stupid to discuss things with them. I really believed I was too dumb cause I couldn't understand positions they held (and everyone seemed to disagree with me). It wasnt until later I realized they're just a big hysterical circle jerk.
They had a rule where you had to be "informed" to post, which meant if you didn't already accept positions they held, you couldn't post in some areas. Lol. I can't believe I got suckered by them.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,071
It is because of what I have always insisted: the transgender movement is just a bunch of fat, hairy, sweaty dudes wearing dresses.
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,072
Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,075
hater !JGlOo5d1iU replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,077
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 35 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,091
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,092
and here's minichan's daily anti-MtF circlejerk
oooh yeah, we're gonna swap negative stereotypes about that lot!
oooh yeah, we're gonna swap negative stereotypes about that lot!
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,095
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
honestly it's better than the daily pedophile bashing circle jerks of a couple of years ago. while always funny, they tended to induce a lot more hyperbole and anger.
honestly it's better than the daily pedophile bashing circle jerks of a couple of years ago. while always funny, they tended to induce a lot more hyperbole and anger.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,098
I think it has a lot to do with biology. It's much easier for FtM transexuals to take testosterone and just let the testosterone do it's thing, while MtF transexuals have to take anti-androgens and females hormones and undo everything that testosterone has done to there bodies while at the same time making their bodies more feminine. It's like adding salt to a dish vs trying to remove salt from a dish if that analogy makes sense.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 double-posted this 11 years ago, 56 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,099
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #577,100
