Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#564,672
hater !JGlOo5d1iU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#564,675
I'm happy nothing has changed. Does Matt still post? I wanted to apologize to him for saying some shitty things to him when I was in a bad place.
So, if you see this Matt, I'm sorry. I'm a pathetic loser and at my lowest I took some of that out on you by joining in with the trolls. My sincere apologies. I can be a bit of bully sometimes.
Lemon Drop !qeK7ilt6gI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 26 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#564,698
I, Matt Miller, did not make this thread. Merci.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 19 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#564,699
@previous (Lemon Drop !qeK7ilt6gI)
Wrong tripcode.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#564,710
I don't know if you're trolling or are actually concerned, but yes, there's way too much Matt nonsense on here. His ego must be swelling from all this drama around him.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#564,719
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
It's like his band of loyal followers don't realize that they are stroking his ego every time they acknowledge him. They are simple minded and helpless fools for not just ignoring him, instead they give him all the attention he craves.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,726
@previous (A)
You sound like an expert on this Matt person, whoever he is.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,728
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,761
@564,758 (G) @previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Don't forget to use the report feature WITH A DESCRIPTIVE MESSAGE AS TO WHY YOU THINK WHATEVER YOU'RE REPORTING SHOULD BE REMOVED.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,763
@previous (r04r)
That's too much like being a tattletale. And please stop yelling, thanks.
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,764
@previous (G)
Note that the system may automatically ban you if it registers a significant amount of deleted posts that have been viewed but not reported by your UID.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,765
@previous (r04r)
I can get banned for scrolling past posts some mod doesn't like?
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,767
@previous (G)
Posts that the system doesn't like. Ban lengths may vary between 4-18 nanoseconds.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,768
@previous (r04r)
Keyword bans are for those that post and those that ignore? How many times do I have to ignore a post that only has the word shtick and not report it before I am banned? Because I've ignored that a lot lately.
Anonymous G double-posted this 11 years ago, 39 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,770
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 7 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,771
@564,768 (G)
There is no definitive number. The system weighs your Poster Reputation Score and makes decisions based on that.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,772
@previous (r04r)
Post the reputation score algorithm. Thanks
r04r replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,773
@previous (G)
It's not an algorithm as such, just a neural network that is trained by having the staff rate all posts made on several scales. This neural network is then fed all new posts including various metadata which it uses to come to a conclusion. The database behind the neural network is too big to share, and the neural network itself is proprietary. Sorry.
Anonymous G replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#564,775