Minichan

Topic: Will your job be done by a machine in 20 years?

Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago #42,464

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/05/21/408234543/will-your-job-be-done-by-a-machine

kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #563,533

Nope

squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,534

nope, lol

hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,535

posting on minichan is my job and business is booming

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 17 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,537

Can machines shitpost on bbs sites with as much fervor?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,538

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I've been working on it

squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,540

@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
do you think we'll see a bot that makes at least as much sense as Syntax in our lifetime? Pretty sure i could do it with just a random word generator, but i'm pretty fucking lazy.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,544

@563,534 (squeegee)
What is your job?

Mine won't be replaced. :')

squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,546

@previous (A)
i'm an assembler on an assembly line. usually i'm bolting on bolts, but sometimes i also screw the screws. let's see a computer do that

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 19 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #563,555

@563,540 (squeegee)
http://www.theverge.com/2015/1/29/7939067/ap-journalism-automation-robots-financial-reporting

squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #563,558

@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
i'm we're being seriously, i think the take away from all this automation in the workplace business is that no one should ever assume they shouldn't always be looking to improve their skill set and adapt and learn new things. automation can be a tool as much as it is competition. as part of my job some tasks may be automated, and that's great because it can make me more efficient and free me up for more additional responsibility. as soon as i start trying to compete with automation for my job then it's a losing battle. either i become one with the automation and transcend to a higher level, or i lose my job like anyone else who can't keep an edge.

i'm fortunate that my actual job requires many of the skills that are difficult to automate so the chances i'll be replaced even in 20 years is pretty small. especially if i keep improving my skill set.

also, OP, 20 years is an awful long time to be worrying about what will happen to the job you've got today. hopefully in 20 years you're off doing bigger and better things and your current job will be taken away from someone else. look more like where you can be in 5 years, and as long as you're taking on more important responsibilities as you are promoted/change jobs, etc. then you'll stay ahead of the robots taking yer jobs.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #563,563

no lol

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #563,570

Assuming I get to roughly where I want to be... Under 5%.

squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,581

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
sure about that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcLThn6Kyuk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWvvtj_XYgY

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,587

@previous (squeegee)
> this video is not available
well allrighty then

squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,594

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
did they work now?

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,595

@previous (squeegee)
Nah. Might be because I'm on a mobile device.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,597

There is a 94.5% chance that yes, it will be!

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,599

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That doesn't surprise me, actually. What fluffers do could be easily done by a machine of some sort.

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 11 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,600

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Eat shit and die nerd. Psychology isn't even real.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,601

@563,597 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You sound like you are planning to ascend to the plane of the machina.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,605

@563,570 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
What is it that you wanna do, KL?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 11 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,609

@563,601 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Isn't everyone?

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,616

I am a fetish porn actor, so no.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 37 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,620

@563,535 (hamfist !t5TYQ9eJPs)
I believe that in 5 years bots will be able to make more interesting posts that most real people

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,629

@previous (M)
If anyone on minichan was "real people" they wouldn't be on minichan.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 56 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,642

I service and maintain robots that replace human manual labour. So when the robots can do that for themselves we are in pretty big trouble

Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,645

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Video of Harvard lecture in which a professor argues that robots will replace MOST human jobs soon.

Anonymous N replied with this 11 years ago, 14 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,647

@previous (L)
He does make a couple of valid points, but I don't agree with the time frame he says it will happen in.

Anonymous L replied with this 11 years ago, 18 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,648

@previous (N)
I know. It seems too soon, but he is (if I remember right) a really top Harvard guy on this topic.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,662

@563,605 (K)
Something in psychology.

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 7 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,813

@563,648 (L)
Being the top expert on robotic replacements at Harvard and being well in-tune with the roll-out plans for robotic replacements in manufacturing are two different things.

TTEH !FFSTTEHV7. joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #563,930

@563,662 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Become a robot psychologist.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.