Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago#42,272
If the government can provide free security, then damn it they can provide a free house. The results would be that children would grow up with a greater sense of security and thus be greater human beings in terms of production.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 50 minutes later[^][v]#561,321
The children of beneficiaries are far more likely to be one also, as that is, in fact, what they have been taught growing up. The livinh in a house = higher human production levels is untrue if the house is free. Just giving people houses has been tried many times, in many countries. Those niggers are now no better off and living in dilapidated houses.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^][v]#561,323
They say one of the reasons poor people remain poor is because often they live in areas where crime is high, where certain crime can traumatize them and does so a lot. Surley crime would go down if a basic need is taken care of.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#561,329
@previous (A)
Are you talking about life in the slums of Calcutta, or niggers in free houses?
But collecting taxes isn't the end of the world is it? Cutting down on some things and collecting a little more... Then as everybody start to own homes, then the price of houses will fall so it gets easier.