Anonymous A started this discussion 11 years ago#42,223
It seems that the death penalty debate has heated up in recent months so when do you think Texas will ever abolish their national past time of putting men to death?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later[^][v]#560,706
Not until gaping your anus is common widespread practise.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#560,715
No... The death penalty should not be abolished. If you're found guilty of murder(and has been proven you did so), you should be executed the same way you killed the other person.
There's no excuse for child sex abuse, you should have your dick sliced open, and have poison dumped into the cut(or something that burns like a motherfucker), then slowly shot to death. Starting with the arms, legs, hands, feet, then your dick, then finally, in the forehead.
I'm all for the death penalty. If you do the crime, do the time.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#560,716
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,721
@previous (squeegee)
Yea, if someone molests your daughter or son, are you gonna let the justice system just put him in prison for 20 yrs? And you knowing someday he will be out, and probably stalk another child?
Fuck that... Kill him now.
If someone murders someone in your family, do you want revenge? Or let a piss poor justice system put him away for 10 yrs? Where he may get out after 5 yrs for good behavior, and come after your family again for revenge?
And remember, druggies are getting more time than killers and child molesters. Kind of goes against the grain don't you think?
The Owl !KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,722
"Our prison system doesn't work properly so we should just kill all the prisoners"
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,724
@previous (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
If you're in there for minor shit like drugs, theft, farting in public... Then give them some time. After 3 strikes, send them to some deserted island and that's where they stay. Survival becomes their problem then.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,725
@560,722 (The Owl !KThEOwLwbU)
Maybe we could send them to Australia?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,726
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,728
@560,715 (C)
Hahaha. Oh my god. I am dying. You are so funny, scary and typically american at the same time. No interest in rehabilitizing at all or anything, just kill them. Lol.
Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,729
I hate the death penalty. It is pure revenge, killing because killing is wrong! Some countries try to actually rehabilitate criminals, but no in Texas! muh freedoms! muh guns!
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,730
@560,728 (B)
My favourite part was them wanting criminals to be "slowly shot to death". That's just so extremely brutal that it's funny.
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,731
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
I wonder what it'd be like to be put feet-first through a meat grinder.
Anonymous F replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,732
@previous (B)
Would you survive loss of blood past your shins? Kook might actually know this
Anonymous B replied with this 11 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,733
@previous (F)
I have no idea. Probably not. And if not that, I guess shock or something would kill you right about then.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 7 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,793
@560,728 (B)
You can't "rehabilitate" a pedophile.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,796
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Nor could anyone rehabilitate Hitler or Osama bin Laden.
Texas does a most excellent job of Death Sentence.
Utah recently decided to allow firing squads for executions.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Metæ joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 21 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,797
@560,729 (Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY)
Matt, aren't you the one always whining about getting executed for running a Falun Gong cell in Kunming?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,799
I like how everyone who hates Texas is a snivelling crying little shitlib with a phd on armchair on sociopolitical whining. God bless Texas.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,800
Yes you can. There have been cases of pedos reintegrating with society
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,804
An eye for an eye makes the world go blind.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,807
@560,802 (dw)
That anyone would even consider allowing this is beyond appalling.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,812
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Don't be so one-dimensional about it. It's possible. Not for all of them, but some can be made to change.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,830
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Do you have any idea what kind of precedent "some can be made to change" sets?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,840
@560,729 (Lemon Drop !CITRUS3QCY)
Why do you hate China?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,841
@560,830 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
And do you have any idea what precent "they are all unchangable monsters, just lock them all up" sets? You would have people act hysterical and terrified rather than viewing this as a mental condition that can be treated.
And it is a fact that some have indeed been changed. A quick search on Google turned up this article. Please ignore the headline, that's referring to an opinion piece published by a doctor. The important part is the last part, which cites a few different opinions from studies and psychological organisations. The key element there is that they all basically report considerable success of rehabilitation programs (to varying degrees). So, apparently, a considerable amount of them have indeed been rehabilitated, so it's possible.
kook !!mCVqftDha joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 23 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,850
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
It seems like the amount that do not reoffend is very low, even with treatment.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,857
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Oh, does it say that somewhere in the article?
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,859
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Didnt it list like a two percent difference in crimes committed by rehabilitated pedophiles?
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,860
@560,715 (C)
Sounds like you're overcompensating a bit because you think it will stop people thinking you're a pedo.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,866
@560,859 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Nope, doesn't look like it. You might've seen the part where the the American Psychological Association website says "sexual recidivism rates of 17.3 percent for untreated offenders, compared with 9.9 percent for treated offenders". Still, 7.4% fewer reoffending is pretty decent.
Oh, also, I should point out that the article is only referring to sex offenders in general, not just pedophiles. Though it includes pedophiles in its data. Sorry, but I didn't really want to type "pedophilia" into Google. Nonetheless, given that the article doesn't seem to list pedophiles as some great exception to the data, I'd assume it more or less fits.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,873
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
lol You wont get in trouble for googling pedophile, you goofy.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,874
@previous (kook !!mCVqftDha)
Hah, probably not. I just get a little paranoid about that sorta thing.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,877
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
If you would get in trouble for that type of thign, I would have been party vanned years ago. Even my Kindle book list is pretty disturbing.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 32 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,895
@560,841 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
You're putting words in my mouth. What I'm saying is that those that have been caught for offending should not be released back into society where the temptation to re-offend exists. Yes it is a mental problem, but the magnitude of damage one single infraction causes isn't worth the possibility that maybe they won't try to do it again. This isn't like when someone is murdered and people mourn for awhile but gradually move on with their lives. This is something that will affect even the smallest aspects of the victim's life in one way or another for the rest of their life. The damage can't be undone. Just because one guy doesn't re-offend, does that make up for the guy who does? Can you tell that to the family of the next victim?
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 50 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,927
@560,877 (kook !!mCVqftDha)
I'm sure you on more than few watchlists though.
kook !!mCVqftDha replied with this 11 years ago, 12 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,935
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 6 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#561,065
@560,895 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
This is a bigger issue than just pedophilia. I could list off other types of offenders who could reoffend in some awful way when released. Rapists, murderers, abusers, stuff like that. All heinous crimes that can ruin lives.
So it becomes an issue of do we want our prisons crammed full of people who are going to stay there forever, or do we try to reform some of them into functioning members of society? Because some can indeed be reformed, as the article I linked to showed. And, if the prison system is doing its job properly, only those who've actually responded to the reform treatment would be let out earlier.
squeegee replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#561,071
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
what if we just put all the criminals on boats and sent them to some huge island somewh-
nevermind, they'll just form a government and end up with sexy accents
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#561,072
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,186
@561,065 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
If it's crowding you're worried about, there's some much more obvious places to start, like prolonged drug sentences. Trying to reform murderers and abusers is fine; those are behavioral issues. Pedophilia is a sexual issue, and sex is one of our most primal, ingrained instincts. I don't believe anything short of a lobotomy can effectively change something like that.
Besides that, if science says pedos can be reformed, conservatives will just use that to support the notion of "gay reform".
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,204
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI) > Trying to reform murderers and abusers is fine; those are behavioral issues. Pedophilia is a sexual issue, and sex is one of our most primal, ingrained instincts.
I've already shown you credible evidence of treatments having an impact. Clearly, your notion that sexual urges are completely unchangable is wrong. Now I'm not saying that they can all be changed for the better, but some can be, so it's worth trying.
And murderers and abusers can also have innate factors to them, such as genes for aggression or differing brain structures. They too can be difficult to change, some impossibly so. They can also be a challenge to reform, yet you're fine with trying to reform them because you apparently have a greater hatred of pedophiles.
> Besides that, if science says pedos can be reformed, conservatives will just use that to support the notion of "gay reform".
Conservatives have already been trying this for years, m8. Heard of ex-gays? Guess what, it's not working too great, and homosexual acceptance is better than ever.
Anonymous G double-posted this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,214
@561,186 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI) @previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Hey, sorry if this came off as combatative or rude. You're generally a cool guy, so I should probably take a more polite tone.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 11 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,218
@previous (G)
Nah it's cool. You're right that my stance is heavily influenced by personal feelings on the matter.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,311