Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Introducing the Internet.org App
By Guy Rosen, Product Management Director
Over 85% of the world’s population lives in areas with existing cellular coverage, yet only about 30% of the total population accesses the internet. Affordability and awareness are significant barriers to internet adoption for many and today we are introducing the Internet.org app to make the internet accessible to more people by providing a set of free basic services.
With this app, people can browse a set of useful health, employment and local information services without data charges. By providing free basic services via the app, we hope to bring more people online and help them discover valuable services they might not have otherwise.
The Internet.org app will be available first to Airtel subscribers in Zambia and we’ll continue to improve the experience and roll it out to other parts of the world.
Through the Internet.org app, Airtel customers in Zambia will have basic access to:
AccuWeather
Airtel
eZeLibrary
Facebook
Facts for Life
Google Search
Go Zambia Jobs
Kokoliko
MAMA (Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action)
Messenger
Wikipedia
WRAPP (Women’s Rights App)
Zambia uReport
Airtel customers in Zambia can access these services in the Internet.org Android app, at internet.org, or within the Facebook for Android app.
Read what people are saying about the Internet.org app.
Updated as of 10/16/14: We’ve added three additional services to the Internet.org app in Zambia:
SuperSport
Zambia Reports
Ebola FAQ by UNICEF
Updated as of 11/11/14: Zambians are using the Internet.org app to access information and connect with each other. Meet a few of them in this 5-minute video.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 11 years ago, 28 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#560,506
But other people think it goes against net neutrality
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#560,507
@560,505 (A)
Granted this is a press release made to make them look in the best possible light, but I think this is fine. What are the downsides? FB gets new customers, the new customers get access to the internet for free. Win/win right?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#560,517
It's cancer and will teach poor people that the Internet only contains the few blessed services that Internet.org includes. This is bad because openness is what made the Internet great. Anyone can create something, rent a server and put it on there. You can now visit it. These people will not have the same experience, they can only access what mark suckerburg decoded they should be allowed to access.
If I want my service to be accessible I'd have to make additional deals and pay money to suckerburg. This is really bad.
It's not the Internet, and it's an outright lie to call it such. It's pretty much a Facebook intranet, with all the tracking suckerburg can dream of.
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#560,518
@previous (C)
Yeah but do we really want the real internet to be overrun by niggers? Didn't think so.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#560,527
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,565
Basically, Zuckerberg wants to get the other 70% of the population on the internet so that he can get the other 70% of the population on Facebook.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,568
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
I find the idea of Facebook being so widespread, so... Integrated into humanity a little creepy, to be honest.
A lot of people seem to just assume that everyone has Facebook, and then there's the unpleasantness of things like Facebook gathering data on people or employers snooping on the Facebooks of their employees.
I dunno, maybe I'm only seeing it from a channer's viewpoint, but it makes me uneasy.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,569
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Although I use Facebook and I'm not too creeped out by it, I do know what you mean. Which is why a project like this which at first seems like an act of philanthropy, with Facebook behind it it seems more nefarious.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,571
@560,568 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
But you'll still buy an Oculus Rift.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,573
@previous (D)
Not necessarily, but why's that relevant?
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#560,574
@560,568 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yes, it's creepy. I don't have a facebook account and that seems to confuse people. Like they legitimately can't comprehend why someone wouldn't want to have a facebook. Bunch of sheep.
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 11 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,091
I deleted my facebook, so I don't have one anymore. When people ask me about facebook, I say I hate it.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,097
@561,089 (C)
Enjoy having to sign into Facebook every time you want to play your hangar simulator or watch 3D porn.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,100
@previous (D)
Is there anything inside your skull at all? I really want to know, since you seem to be lacking a brain. It is very unlikely for facebook to couple their VR product tightly with facebook, but if they do: None of the facebook haters will be buying it. Fucking duh. Oculus Rift is not the only VR product out there, Steam is also working on something and once the oculus hits mainstream it'll be less than a year for a bunch of competitors to rip them off and to start competing.
So, while I know that you are fucking retarded, please try your best to explain why you think I, or any other facebook hater, would be buying an oculus rift if they require facebook integration? Maybe you've never heard of reviews? Is this perhaps a foreign concept to you? Or is it really just the lack of having a brain? Enlighten me.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,111
@previous (C)
Why are you getting so worked up? It's just a pair of plastic novelty binoculars that you strap to your face to watch porn or play Farmville. Why are you getting so worked up?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,112
@previous (D)
If you can't comprehend that, then there's no point in trying to converse with you. I think you would feel more at home grazing with cows.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,114
@previous (C)
Steam is as bad as Facebook. Your plastic novelty porn binoculars are going to be tightly integrated with spyware regardless of whom you buy them from.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,115
@previous (D)
Have you ever heard of reverse engineering, open source drivers and linux in general? That's going to happen regardless of where the hardware comes from, but this is probably too complex for you to understand, so I don't really blame you. As for steam being spyware, that is a mighty hefty claim from someone who doesn't seem to even know of the existence of any of the aforementioned subjects. Can you provide any proof for this claim, or are you just making things up now? And no, some hyped up online media article, a reddit post or a blog is not proof. That is just someone claiming things. If you have any proof through decompilation or syscall logs or whatever, I'd like to see it.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,118
@previous (C)
So when Facebook expects you to sign in and let it follow you around the internet and log everything you do, that upsets you, but it's fine when Steam does it? Looks like you're being blinkered by your videogame addiction.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,122
@previous (D)
I... Do you have downs? Did your mother drop you on your head as a child? What the fuck is wrong with you? Facebook is unpleasant because they include widgets in all kinds of other sites (like buttons, comment boxes, etc) and Steam does not do this. They do not have any embeds for other sites to use, so please do tell me how they are tracking my internet usage. Perhaps you are implying their steam client is doing anything nefarious, but that is quite silly as it can be easily analyzed. And has been. There has been a bit of controversy in the past with it looking at the dns cache, but all this was proven to be processed client-side. However, as usual, you did not provide any source or reference, so I suppose you're just making things up as you go. Pathetic.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,123
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,124
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Thank you, I really try.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,128
@561,122 (C)
Your Stockholm syndrome is flaring up.
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,129
@previous (D)
Hardly. I'm not actually a big fan of steam, your points are just... Really, really bad. Now you don't even seem to have anything to dispute my posts. So, just stop posting. You've lost.
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,130
@previous (C)
Why are you getting so worked up over a disagreement about your favourite toys? Are you one of those "#gamergates" people?
Anonymous C replied with this 11 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,131
@previous (D)
See attached, creatures of similar intelligence as you. I am not at all worked up, you are however incredibly stupid and making some points that honestly impress me with how little thought is behind them. Same with the post you made just now, it's becoming way to obvious that you're just trying to troll now. Again, pathetic.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 11 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,132
@561,130 (D)
i guess youre a fucking retard or someone with downs or something because that made no sense at all
Anonymous D replied with this 11 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#561,133